Genome diversity of Chinese indigenous chicken and the selective signatures in Chinese gamecock chicken.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 09 2020
Historique:
received: 08 06 2020
accepted: 03 08 2020
entrez: 5 9 2020
pubmed: 5 9 2020
medline: 9 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Gamecock chickens are one of the earliest recorded birds in China, and have accumulated some unique morphological and behavioral signatures such as large body size, muscularity and aggressive behavior, whereby being excellent breeding materials and a good model for studying bird muscular development and behavior. In this study, we sequenced 126 chicken genomes from 19 populations, including four commercial chicken breeds that are commonly farmed in China, 13 nationwide Chinese typical indigenous chicken breeds (including two Chinese gamecock breeds), one red jungle fowl from Guangxi Province of China and three gamecock chickens from Laos. Combined with 31 published chicken genomes from three populations, a comparative genomics analysis was performed across 157 chickens. We found a severe confounding effect on potential cold adaptation exerted by introgression from commercial chickens into Chinese indigenous chickens, and argued that the genetic introgression from commercial chickens into indigenous chickens should be seriously considered for identifying selection footprint in indigenous chickens. LX gamecock chickens might have played a core role in recent breeding and conservation of other Chinese gamecock chickens. Importantly, AGMO (Alkylglycerol monooxygenase) and CPZ (Carboxypeptidase Z) might be crucial for determining the behavioral pattern of gamecock chickens, while ISPD (Isoprenoid synthase domain containing) might be essential for the muscularity of gamecock chickens. Our results can further the understanding of the evolution of Chinese gamecock chickens, especially the genetic basis of gamecock chickens revealed here was valuable for us to better understand the mechanisms underlying the behavioral pattern and the muscular development in chicken.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32883984
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71421-z
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-71421-z
pmc: PMC7471287
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

14532

Références

Miao, Y. W. et al. Chicken domestication: An updated perspective based on mitochondrial genomes. Heredity 110(3), 277–282 (2013).
pubmed: 23211792
Wang, M. S. et al. 863 genomes reveal the origin and domestication of chicken. Cell. Res. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-020-0349-y (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0349-y pubmed: 32848200 pmcid: 7445228
Chen, K. W. et al. Animal Genetic Resources in China: Poultry 1–357 (China Agricultural Press, Beijing, 2011).
Wang, M. S. et al. Genomic analyses reveal potential independent adaptation to high altitude in Tibetan Chickens. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32(7), 1880–1889 (2015).
pubmed: 25788450
Zhang, Q. et al. Genome resequencing identifies unique adaptations of Tibetan chickens to hypoxia and high-dose ultraviolet radiation in high-altitude environments. Genome. Biol. Evol. 8(3), 765–776 (2016).
pubmed: 26907498 pmcid: 4824011
Li, D. et al. Genomic data for 78 chickens from 14 populations. Gigascience. 6(6), 1–5 (2017).
pubmed: 29220491 pmcid: 5751039
Chen, L. et al. Population genetic analyses of seven Chinese indigenous chicken breeds in a context of global breeds. Anim. Genet. 50(1), 82–86 (2019).
pubmed: 30421435
Nie, C. et al. Genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism data unveil admixture of Chinese indigenous chicken breeds with commercial breeds. Genome. Biol. Evol. 11(7), 1847–1856 (2019).
pubmed: 31263886 pmcid: 6609729
Perry-Gal, L., Erlich, A., Gilboa, A. & Bar-Oz, G. Earliest economic exploitation of chicken outside East Asia: Evidence from the Hellenistic Southern Levant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112(32), 9849–9854 (2015).
pubmed: 26195775
Liu, Y. P., Zhu, Q. & Yao, Y. G. Genetic relationship of Chinese and Japanese gamecocks revealed by mtDNA sequence variation. Biochem. Genet. 44(1–2), 19–29 (2006).
pubmed: 16648993
Guo, X. et al. Whole-genome resequencing of Xishuangbanna fighting chicken to identify signatures of selection. Genet. Sel. Evol. 48(1), 62 (2016).
pubmed: 27565441 pmcid: 5000499
Luzuriaga-Neira, A. et al. The Local South American chicken populations are a melting-pot of genomic diversity. Front. Genet. 10, 1172 (2019).
pubmed: 31803242 pmcid: 6877731
Ai, H. et al. Adaptation and possible ancient interspecies introgression in pigs identified by whole-genome sequencing. Nat. Genet. 47(3), 217–225 (2015).
pubmed: 25621459
Yang, J. et al. Whole-genome sequencing of native sheep provides insights into rapid adaptations to extreme environments. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33(10), 2576–2592 (2016).
pubmed: 27401233 pmcid: 5026255
Kim, J. et al. The genome landscape of indigenous African cattle. Genome. Biol. 18(1), 34 (2017).
pubmed: 28219390 pmcid: 5319050
Librado, P. et al. Tracking the origins of Yakutian horses and the genetic basis for their fast adaptation to subarctic environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112(50), E6889–E6897 (2015).
pubmed: 26598656
Hillier, L. W. & International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432, 695–716 (2014).
Walugembe, M. et al. Detection of selection signatures among Brazilian, Sri Lankan, and Egyptian chicken populations under different environmental conditions. Front. Genet. 9, 737 (2019).
pubmed: 30693019 pmcid: 6339939
Elbeltagy, A. R. et al. Natural selection footprints among african chicken breeds and village ecotypes. Front. Genet. 10, 376 (2019).
pubmed: 31139205 pmcid: 6518202
Fumihito, A. et al. Monophyletic origin and unique dispersal patterns of domestic fowls. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93(13), 6792–6795 (1996).
pubmed: 8692897
Altar, C. A. et al. Anterograde transport of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and its role in the brain. Nature 389(6653), 856–860 (1997).
pubmed: 9349818
Spalletta, G. et al. BDNF Val66Met polymorphism is associated with aggressive behavior in schizophrenia. Eur. Psychiatry. 25(6), 311–313 (2010).
pubmed: 20430595
Willmann, K. L. et al. Biallelic loss-of-function mutation in NIK causes a primary immunodeficiency with multifaceted aberrant lymphoid immunity. Nat. Commun. 5, 5360 (2014).
pubmed: 25406581 pmcid: 4263125
Hutchinson, J. R. et al. Musculoskeletal modelling of an ostrich (Struthio camelus) pelvic limb: Influence of limb orientation on muscular capacity during locomotion. PeerJ. 3, e1001 (2015).
pubmed: 26082859 pmcid: 4465956
Alrayes, N. et al. The alkylglycerol monooxygenase (AGMO) gene previously involved in autism also causes a novel syndromic form of primary microcephaly in a consanguineous Saudi family. J. Neurol. Sci. 363, 240–244 (2016).
pubmed: 27000257
Okur, V. et al. Biallelic variants in AGMO with diminished enzyme activity are associated with a neurodevelopmental disorder. Hum. Genet. 138(11–12), 1259–1266 (2019).
pubmed: 31555905
Roscioli, T. et al. Mutations in ISPD cause Walker–Warburg syndrome and defective glycosylation of α-dystroglycan. Nat. Genet. 44(5), 581–585 (2012).
pubmed: 22522421 pmcid: 3378661
Gerin, I. et al. ISPD produces CDP-ribitol used by FKTN and FKRP to transfer ribitol phosphate onto α-dystroglycan. Nat. Commun. 7, 11534 (2016).
pubmed: 27194101 pmcid: 4873967
Cataldi, M. P. et al. ISPD overexpression enhances ribitol-induced glycosylation of α-dystroglycan in dystrophic FKRP mutant mice. Mol. Ther. Methods. Clin. Dev. 17, 271–280 (2020).
pubmed: 31988979
Willer, T. et al. ISPD loss-of-function mutations disrupt dystroglycan O-mannosylation and cause Walker–Warburg syndrome. Nat. Genet. 44(5), 575–580 (2012).
pubmed: 22522420 pmcid: 3371168
Li, Z. et al. Genome-wide association study of aggressive behaviour in chicken. Sci. Rep. 6, 30981 (2016).
pubmed: 27485826 pmcid: 4971532
McDaniel, L. D. et al. Common variants upstream of MLF1 at 3q25 and within CPZ at 4p16 associated with neuroblastoma. PLoS. Genet. 13(5), e1006787 (2017).
pubmed: 28545128 pmcid: 5456408
Wright, D. et al. Copy number variation in intron 1 of SOX5 causes the Pea-comb phenotype in chickens. PLoS. Genet. 5(6), e1000512 (2009).
pubmed: 19521496 pmcid: 2685452
Zhou, Z. et al. An intercross population study reveals genes associated with body size and plumage color in ducks. Nat. Commun. 9(1), 2648 (2018).
pubmed: 30018292 pmcid: 6050300
Anh, N. T., Kunhareang, S. & Duangjinda, M. Association of chicken growth hormones and insulin-like growth factor gene polymorphisms with growth performance and carcass traits in Thai Broilers. Asian Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 28(12), 1686–1695 (2015).
Sokol, D. K. et al. High levels of Alzheimer beta-amyloid precursor protein (APP) in children with severely autistic behavior and aggression. J. Child. Neurol. 21(6), 444–449 (2006).
pubmed: 16948926
Desai, J. et al. Nell1-deficient mice have reduced expression of extracellular matrix proteins causing cranial and vertebral defects. Hum. Mol. Genet. 15(8), 1329–1341 (2006).
pubmed: 16537572
Wang, Y. et al. BK ablation attenuates osteoblast bone formation via integrin pathway. Cell. Death. Dis. 10(10), 738 (2019).
pubmed: 31570694 pmcid: 6769012
Baker, N. L. et al. Dominant collagen VI mutations are a common cause of Ullrich congenital muscular dystrophy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14(2), 279–293 (2005).
pubmed: 15563506
Nguyen, L. N. et al. Mfsd2a is a transporter for the essential omega-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid. Nature 509(7501), 503–506 (2014).
pubmed: 24828044
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25(14), 1754–1760 (2009).
pubmed: 19451168 pmcid: 19451168
Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25(16), 2078–2079 (2009).
pubmed: 2723002 pmcid: 2723002
McKenna, A. et al. The genome analysis toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome. Res. 20(9), 1297–1303 (2010).
pubmed: 20644199 pmcid: 2928508
Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27(15), 2156–2158 (2011).
pubmed: 3137218 pmcid: 3137218
Wang, K., Li, M. & Hakonarson, H. ANNOVAR: Functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 38(16), e164 (2010).
pubmed: 20601685 pmcid: 2938201
Rubin, C. J. et al. Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication. Nature 464(7288), 587–591 (2010).
pubmed: 20220755
Barrett, J. C., Fry, B., Maller, J. & Daly, M. J. Haploview: Analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21(2), 263–265 (2010).
Weir, B. S. & Cockerham, C. C. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38(6), 1358–1370 (1984).
pubmed: 28563791 pmcid: 28563791
Vilella, A. J. et al. EnsemblCompara GeneTrees: Complete, duplication-aware phylogenetic trees in vertebrates. Genome. Res. 19(2), 327–335 (2009).
pubmed: 19029536 pmcid: 2652215
Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81(3), 559–575 (2007).
pubmed: 17701901 pmcid: 17701901
Price, A. L. et al. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 38(8), 904–909 (2006).
pubmed: 16862161
Alexander, D. H., Novembre, J. & Lange, K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome. Res. 19(9), 1655–1664 (2009).
pubmed: 19648217 pmcid: 2752134
Pickrell, J. K. & Pritchard, J. K. Inference of population splits and mixtures from genome-wide allele frequency data. PLoS. Genet. 8(11), e1002967 (2012).
pubmed: 23166502 pmcid: 3499260
Tang, H. & Thomas, P. D. PANTHER-PSEP: Predicting disease-causing genetic variants using position-specific evolutionary preservation. Bioinformatics 32(14), 2230–2232 (2016).
pubmed: 27193693

Auteurs

Wei Luo (W)

Department of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding and Key Lab of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China.

Chenglong Luo (C)

State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.

Meng Wang (M)

Novogene Bioinformatics Institute, Beijing, China.

Lijin Guo (L)

Department of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding and Key Lab of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China.

Xiaolan Chen (X)

Department of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding and Key Lab of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China.

Zhenhui Li (Z)

Department of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding and Key Lab of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China.

Ming Zheng (M)

Department of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding and Key Lab of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China.

Bello Semiu Folaniyi (BS)

Department of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding and Key Lab of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China.

Wen Luo (W)

Department of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding and Key Lab of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China.

Dingming Shu (D)

State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.

Linliang Song (L)

Institute of Laboratory Animals, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Meixia Fang (M)

Institute of Laboratory Animals, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Xiquan Zhang (X)

Department of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding and Key Lab of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China.

Hao Qu (H)

State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China. qhw03@163.com.

Qinghua Nie (Q)

Department of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China. nqinghua@scau.edu.cn.
Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding and Key Lab of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China. nqinghua@scau.edu.cn.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice

Classifications MeSH