Dose-response relationships for radiation-related heart disease: Impact of uncertainties in cardiac dose reconstruction.

Cardiac dose reconstruction Childhood cancer Hodgkin lymphoma Late-effects Radiation dose-response relationships Radiation-related heart disease

Journal

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
ISSN: 1879-0887
Titre abrégé: Radiother Oncol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8407192

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2020
Historique:
received: 16 04 2020
revised: 26 08 2020
accepted: 26 08 2020
pubmed: 6 9 2020
medline: 15 4 2021
entrez: 5 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Radiation-related heart disease (RRHD) can occur many decades after thoracic radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) or childhood cancer (CC). To quantify the likely risk of RRHD for patients treated today, dose-response relationships derived from patients treated in previous decades are used. Publications presenting these dose-response relationships usually include estimates of uncertainties in the risks but ignore the effect of uncertainties in the reconstructed cardiac doses. We assessed the systematic and random uncertainties in the reconstructed doses for published dose-response relationships for RRHD risk in survivors of HL or CC. Using the same reconstruction methods as were used in the original publications, we reconstructed mean heart doses and, wherever possible, mean left-ventricular doses for an independent case-series of test patients. These patients had known, CT-based, cardiac doses which were compared with the reconstructed doses to estimate the magnitude of the uncertainties and their effect on the dose-response relationships. For all five reconstruction methods the relationship between reconstructed and CT-based doses was linear. For all but the simplest reconstruction method, the dose uncertainties were moderate, the effect of the systematic uncertainty on the dose-response relationships was less than 10%, and the effects of random uncertainty were small except at the highest doses. These results increase confidence in the published dose-response relationships for the risk of RRHD in HL and CC survivors. This may encourage doctors to use these dose-response relationships when estimating individualised risks for patients-an important aspect of personalising radiotherapy treatments today.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Radiation-related heart disease (RRHD) can occur many decades after thoracic radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) or childhood cancer (CC). To quantify the likely risk of RRHD for patients treated today, dose-response relationships derived from patients treated in previous decades are used. Publications presenting these dose-response relationships usually include estimates of uncertainties in the risks but ignore the effect of uncertainties in the reconstructed cardiac doses.
MATERIALS/METHODS
We assessed the systematic and random uncertainties in the reconstructed doses for published dose-response relationships for RRHD risk in survivors of HL or CC. Using the same reconstruction methods as were used in the original publications, we reconstructed mean heart doses and, wherever possible, mean left-ventricular doses for an independent case-series of test patients. These patients had known, CT-based, cardiac doses which were compared with the reconstructed doses to estimate the magnitude of the uncertainties and their effect on the dose-response relationships.
RESULTS
For all five reconstruction methods the relationship between reconstructed and CT-based doses was linear. For all but the simplest reconstruction method, the dose uncertainties were moderate, the effect of the systematic uncertainty on the dose-response relationships was less than 10%, and the effects of random uncertainty were small except at the highest doses.
CONCLUSIONS
These results increase confidence in the published dose-response relationships for the risk of RRHD in HL and CC survivors. This may encourage doctors to use these dose-response relationships when estimating individualised risks for patients-an important aspect of personalising radiotherapy treatments today.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32890611
pii: S0167-8140(20)30751-9
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.08.022
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

155-162

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_U137686858
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Georgios Ntentas (G)

Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Medical Physics, London, UK. Electronic address: georgios.ntentas@ndph.ox.ac.uk.

Sarah C Darby (SC)

Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Marianne C Aznar (MC)

Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, UK.

David C Hodgson (DC)

Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada.

Rebecca M Howell (RM)

Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.

Maja V Maraldo (MV)

Department of Clinical Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.

Sameera Ahmed (S)

Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada.

Angela Ng (A)

Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada.

Berthe M P Aleman (BMP)

Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

David J Cutter (DJ)

Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Cancer Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH