The Role of Educational Level and Cognitive Status in Men Undergoing Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation.


Journal

Urology
ISSN: 1527-9995
Titre abrégé: Urology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0366151

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2021
Historique:
received: 10 12 2019
revised: 04 05 2020
accepted: 06 05 2020
pubmed: 6 9 2020
medline: 25 2 2022
entrez: 5 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To examine the relationship between education level, cognitive function of patients and the success/ revision rates of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in men with postprostatectomy incontinence. Between January 2010 and March 2018, 163 patients (mean age, 68 ± 6.8 years) with moderate-to-severe stress urinary incontinence who underwent AUS implantation were retrospectively examined. Demographic data, body mass index, comorbidities, surgical technique, previous strictures, and radiation therapy were recorded. Incontinence was measured by daily pad use and evaluated by International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-short form. Patients' overall improvement was assessed using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire. Education level was determined using the International Standard Classification of Education. Cognitive status was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination. Treatment success was defined as the need for ≤1 pad/day at last follow-up. AUS was successful in 77.3% of patients. The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-short form score improved significantly from 19.9 ± 2.9 to 4.4 ± 5.4 (P = .001). The median outcome reported subjectively on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale was 2.1 ± 1.5 (1-7) and self-reported as "much better." Patients' education level had statistically no significant relationship with AUS success and revision rates. Similarly, there was no significant relationship between cognitive status, educational level and the need for revision of AUS (P >.05). However, patients with moderate cognitive impairment and a body mass index >30 showed significantly lower AUS success rates (P <.05). AUS implantation is safe and effective treatment option especially for nonobese and cognitively intact patients of all educational levels.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32890621
pii: S0090-4295(20)31040-2
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.05.112
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

243-249

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Ahmet Keles (A)

Istanbul Esenyurt State Hospital, Department of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: drkeles2009@yahoo.com.

Rahmi Onur (R)

Marmara University School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey.

Murat Aydos (M)

University of Health Sciences, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Bursa, Turkey.

Murat Dincer (M)

University of Health Sciences, Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey.

Orhan Koca (O)

University of Health Sciences, Haydarpasa Numune Education and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey.

Burhan Coskun (B)

Uludag University School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Bursa, Turkey.

Abdurrahim Imamoglu (A)

University of Health Sciences, Diskapi Training and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Ankara, Turkey.

Ahmet Karakeci (A)

Firat University School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Elazig, Turkey.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH