The Role of Educational Level and Cognitive Status in Men Undergoing Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation.
Journal
Urology
ISSN: 1527-9995
Titre abrégé: Urology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0366151
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2021
01 2021
Historique:
received:
10
12
2019
revised:
04
05
2020
accepted:
06
05
2020
pubmed:
6
9
2020
medline:
25
2
2022
entrez:
5
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To examine the relationship between education level, cognitive function of patients and the success/ revision rates of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in men with postprostatectomy incontinence. Between January 2010 and March 2018, 163 patients (mean age, 68 ± 6.8 years) with moderate-to-severe stress urinary incontinence who underwent AUS implantation were retrospectively examined. Demographic data, body mass index, comorbidities, surgical technique, previous strictures, and radiation therapy were recorded. Incontinence was measured by daily pad use and evaluated by International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-short form. Patients' overall improvement was assessed using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire. Education level was determined using the International Standard Classification of Education. Cognitive status was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination. Treatment success was defined as the need for ≤1 pad/day at last follow-up. AUS was successful in 77.3% of patients. The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-short form score improved significantly from 19.9 ± 2.9 to 4.4 ± 5.4 (P = .001). The median outcome reported subjectively on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale was 2.1 ± 1.5 (1-7) and self-reported as "much better." Patients' education level had statistically no significant relationship with AUS success and revision rates. Similarly, there was no significant relationship between cognitive status, educational level and the need for revision of AUS (P >.05). However, patients with moderate cognitive impairment and a body mass index >30 showed significantly lower AUS success rates (P <.05). AUS implantation is safe and effective treatment option especially for nonobese and cognitively intact patients of all educational levels.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32890621
pii: S0090-4295(20)31040-2
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.05.112
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
243-249Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.