Failure to administer multimodality therapy leads to sub-optimal outcomes for patients with node-positive biliary tract cancers in the United States.


Journal

Surgical oncology
ISSN: 1879-3320
Titre abrégé: Surg Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9208188

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 21 01 2020
revised: 15 04 2020
accepted: 18 06 2020
entrez: 6 9 2020
pubmed: 7 9 2020
medline: 9 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Lymph node-positive biliary tract cancers have poor overall survival. Surgical resection followed by systemic chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment. We sought to assess the delivery of multimodality therapy in the United States. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database was used to identify patients with node-positive biliary tract cancers without distant metastases from 2000 to 2014. Patients were stratified by disease subtype (gallbladder cancer, intrahepatic, extrahepatic, or hilar cholangiocarcinoma) and treatment received (surgery alone, chemotherapy alone, or surgery + chemotherapy). Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard modeling. A total of 3226 patients with node-positive biliary tract cancers were identified. Of 2837 patients who underwent surgical resection, 1386 (49%) received no systemic chemotherapy following surgery, while 1451 (51%) received surgery + chemotherapy. A total of 389 patients (12%) received chemotherapy alone. Median overall survival was longer for patients who underwent surgery + chemotherapy (19 months, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in survival for those who received surgery alone versus chemotherapy alone (10 months for both, p = NS). Receipt of surgery + chemotherapy was independently associated with survival on Cox proportional hazard ratio modeling compared to surgery alone (HR for mortality 1.71, 95% CI 1.56-1.87, p < 0.0001) or chemotherapy alone (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.46-1.92, p < 0.0001). These trends were consistent across all disease subtypes. Optimal survival for node-positive biliary tract cancers depends on multimodality therapy. Following surgery, a substantial proportion of patients do not receive guideline recommended adjuvant therapy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Lymph node-positive biliary tract cancers have poor overall survival. Surgical resection followed by systemic chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment. We sought to assess the delivery of multimodality therapy in the United States.
METHODS METHODS
The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database was used to identify patients with node-positive biliary tract cancers without distant metastases from 2000 to 2014. Patients were stratified by disease subtype (gallbladder cancer, intrahepatic, extrahepatic, or hilar cholangiocarcinoma) and treatment received (surgery alone, chemotherapy alone, or surgery + chemotherapy). Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard modeling.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 3226 patients with node-positive biliary tract cancers were identified. Of 2837 patients who underwent surgical resection, 1386 (49%) received no systemic chemotherapy following surgery, while 1451 (51%) received surgery + chemotherapy. A total of 389 patients (12%) received chemotherapy alone. Median overall survival was longer for patients who underwent surgery + chemotherapy (19 months, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in survival for those who received surgery alone versus chemotherapy alone (10 months for both, p = NS). Receipt of surgery + chemotherapy was independently associated with survival on Cox proportional hazard ratio modeling compared to surgery alone (HR for mortality 1.71, 95% CI 1.56-1.87, p < 0.0001) or chemotherapy alone (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.46-1.92, p < 0.0001). These trends were consistent across all disease subtypes.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
Optimal survival for node-positive biliary tract cancers depends on multimodality therapy. Following surgery, a substantial proportion of patients do not receive guideline recommended adjuvant therapy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32891346
pii: S0960-7404(20)30331-5
doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.06.004
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

298-303

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Auteurs

Adam C Sheka (AC)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Ariella Altman (A)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Schelomo Marmor (S)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Jane Y C Hui (JYC)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Jason W Denbo (JW)

Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.

Jacob S Ankeny (JS)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Eric H Jensen (EH)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Electronic address: jense893@umn.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH