Women's characteristics and care outcomes of caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study.


Journal

BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 04 06 2019
accepted: 21 08 2020
entrez: 7 9 2020
pubmed: 8 9 2020
medline: 28 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The maternity care system in the Netherlands is well known for its support of community-based midwifery. However, regular midwifery practices typically do not offer caseload midwifery care - one-to-one continuity of care throughout pregnancy and birth. Because we know very little about the outcomes for women receiving caseload care in the Netherlands, we compared caseload care with regular midwife-led care, looking at maternal and perinatal outcomes, including antenatal and intrapartum referrals to secondary (i.e., obstetrician-led) care. We selected 657 women in caseload care and 1954 matched controls (women in regular midwife-led care) from all women registered in the Dutch Perinatal Registry (Perined) who gave birth in 2015. To be eligible for selection the women had to be in midwife-led antenatal care beyond 28 gestational weeks. Each woman in caseload care was matched with three women in regular midwife-led care, using parity, maternal age, background (Dutch or non-Dutch) and region. These two cohorts were compared for referral rates, mode of birth, and other maternal and perinatal outcomes. In caseload midwifery care, 46.9% of women were referred to obstetrician-led care (24.2% antenatally and 22.8% in the intrapartum period). In the matched cohort, 65.7% were referred (37.4% antenatally and 28.3% in the intrapartum period). In caseload care, 84.0% experienced a spontaneous vaginal birth versus 77.0% in regular midwife-led care. These patterns were observed for both nulliparous and multiparous women. Women in caseload care had fewer inductions of labour (13.2% vs 21.0%), more homebirths (39.4% vs 16.1%) and less perineal damage (intact perineum: 41.3% vs 28.2%). The incidence of perinatal mortality and a low Apgar score was low in both groups. We found that when compared to regular midwife-led care, caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands is associated with a lower referral rate to obstetrician-led care - both antenatally and in the intrapartum period - and a higher spontaneous vaginal birth rate, with similar perinatal safety. The challenge is to include this model as part of the current effort to improve the quality of Dutch maternity care, making caseload care available and affordable for more women.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The maternity care system in the Netherlands is well known for its support of community-based midwifery. However, regular midwifery practices typically do not offer caseload midwifery care - one-to-one continuity of care throughout pregnancy and birth. Because we know very little about the outcomes for women receiving caseload care in the Netherlands, we compared caseload care with regular midwife-led care, looking at maternal and perinatal outcomes, including antenatal and intrapartum referrals to secondary (i.e., obstetrician-led) care.
METHODS METHODS
We selected 657 women in caseload care and 1954 matched controls (women in regular midwife-led care) from all women registered in the Dutch Perinatal Registry (Perined) who gave birth in 2015. To be eligible for selection the women had to be in midwife-led antenatal care beyond 28 gestational weeks. Each woman in caseload care was matched with three women in regular midwife-led care, using parity, maternal age, background (Dutch or non-Dutch) and region. These two cohorts were compared for referral rates, mode of birth, and other maternal and perinatal outcomes.
RESULTS RESULTS
In caseload midwifery care, 46.9% of women were referred to obstetrician-led care (24.2% antenatally and 22.8% in the intrapartum period). In the matched cohort, 65.7% were referred (37.4% antenatally and 28.3% in the intrapartum period). In caseload care, 84.0% experienced a spontaneous vaginal birth versus 77.0% in regular midwife-led care. These patterns were observed for both nulliparous and multiparous women. Women in caseload care had fewer inductions of labour (13.2% vs 21.0%), more homebirths (39.4% vs 16.1%) and less perineal damage (intact perineum: 41.3% vs 28.2%). The incidence of perinatal mortality and a low Apgar score was low in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We found that when compared to regular midwife-led care, caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands is associated with a lower referral rate to obstetrician-led care - both antenatally and in the intrapartum period - and a higher spontaneous vaginal birth rate, with similar perinatal safety. The challenge is to include this model as part of the current effort to improve the quality of Dutch maternity care, making caseload care available and affordable for more women.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32894082
doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03204-3
pii: 10.1186/s12884-020-03204-3
pmc: PMC7487921
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

517

Références

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jun 1;18(1):192
pubmed: 29855270
Midwifery. 2000 Dec;16(4):295-302
pubmed: 11080465
Lancet. 1996 Jul 27;348(9022):213-8
pubmed: 8684197
Midwifery. 2016 Sep;40:70-8
pubmed: 27428101
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Dec 16;17(1):423
pubmed: 29246129
Women Birth. 2016 Jun;29(3):214-22
pubmed: 26603016
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 28;4:CD004667
pubmed: 27121907
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Dec 6;18(1):481
pubmed: 30522453
BJOG. 2012 Nov;119(12):1483-92
pubmed: 22830446
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018 Jun;16:82-85
pubmed: 29804782
Birth. 2008 Jun;35(2):107-16
pubmed: 18507581
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 May 27;15:121
pubmed: 26013394
Women Birth. 2010 Sep;23(3):103-10
pubmed: 20207213
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 24;14:46
pubmed: 24456576
Midwifery. 2014 Sep;30(9):991-7
pubmed: 24074733
Midwifery. 2001 Sep;17(3):234-40
pubmed: 11502143
BJOG. 2009 Jun;116(7):923-32
pubmed: 19522796
Midwifery. 2018 Jul;62:220-229
pubmed: 29723790
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Oct;69(8):1228-35
pubmed: 19699570
Birth. 2013 Sep;40(3):192-201
pubmed: 24635504
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 May 09;9:18
pubmed: 19426525
Lancet. 2013 Nov 23;382(9906):1723-32
pubmed: 24050808
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018 Jun;16:50-55
pubmed: 29804775
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 27;12(7):e0180846
pubmed: 28749944
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 17;14:27
pubmed: 24438469

Auteurs

Pien Offerhaus (P)

Research Centre for Midwifery Science, Midwifery Education and Studies Maastricht, ZUYD University, Universiteitssingel 60, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands. p.offerhaus@av-m.nl.

Suze Jans (S)

TNO, Department of Child Health, Schipholweg 77, 2316 ZL, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Chantal Hukkelhoven (C)

Perined, Mercatorlaan 1200, 3528 BL, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Raymond de Vries (R)

Research Centre for Midwifery Science, Midwifery Education and Studies Maastricht, ZUYD University, Universiteitssingel 60, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
CAPHRI (School for Public Health and Primary Care), Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 14, CBSSM, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2800, USA.

Marianne Nieuwenhuijze (M)

Research Centre for Midwifery Science, Midwifery Education and Studies Maastricht, ZUYD University, Universiteitssingel 60, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH