Morphologic response to chemotherapy containing bevacizumab in patients with colorectal liver metastases: A post hoc analysis of the WJOG4407G phase III study.
Adult
Aged
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Bevacizumab
/ administration & dosage
Colorectal Neoplasms
/ pathology
Female
Fluorouracil
/ therapeutic use
Humans
Infusions, Intravenous
/ methods
Irinotecan
/ therapeutic use
Japan
/ epidemiology
Leucovorin
/ administration & dosage
Liver Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Metastasis
/ drug therapy
Oxaliplatin
/ therapeutic use
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Progression-Free Survival
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
/ methods
Topoisomerase I Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
Vitamin B Complex
/ administration & dosage
Journal
Medicine
ISSN: 1536-5964
Titre abrégé: Medicine (Baltimore)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985248R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Sep 2020
04 Sep 2020
Historique:
entrez:
9
9
2020
pubmed:
10
9
2020
medline:
20
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The phase III West Japan Oncology Group (WJOG) 4407G study showed noninferiority of folinic acid, bolus/continuous fluorouracil, and irinotecan plus bevacizumab to modified folinic acid, bolus/continuous fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin 6 plus bevacizumab in progression-free survival (PFS) as first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive and prognostic value of morphologic response in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) as a post hoc analysis of the WJOG4407G study.Morphologic response was assessed by comparing contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images at baseline and week 8. Three blinded radiologists evaluated CT images and classified their response as optimal, incomplete, or no response according to the morphologic criteria. Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) response, early tumor shrinkage (ETS), and depth of response (DpR) were also evaluated.Among 395 patients who were eligible for efficacy analysis in the WJOG4407G study, 70 patients had liver-limited disease. We finally evaluated 55 of these patients. Optimal morphologic response was identified in 19 of 55 patients (34.5%). The median PFS was 10.7 months for patients with optimal response and 10.1 months in those with incomplete/no response (log-rank, P = .96). The median overall survival (OS) was 26.2 and 35.5 months, respectively (log-rank, P = .062). According to univariate analysis, morphologic response was not associated with PFS or OS, whereas RECIST response was significantly associated with both PFS and OS, with ETS and DpR being associated with significantly longer PFS.Morphologic response might be neither a predictive nor a prognostic factor in patients with CLM undergoing chemotherapy containing bevacizumab, whereas RECIST response was significantly associated with both PFS and OS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32899071
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022060
pii: 00005792-202009040-00083
pmc: PMC7478588
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
0
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
Topoisomerase I Inhibitors
0
Oxaliplatin
04ZR38536J
Vitamin B Complex
12001-76-2
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
Irinotecan
7673326042
Leucovorin
Q573I9DVLP
Fluorouracil
U3P01618RT
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e22060Références
Gut. 2018 Jun;67(6):1095-1102
pubmed: 29084828
Digestion. 2014;89(1):43-8
pubmed: 24458112
Anticancer Res. 2018 Nov;38(11):6501-6506
pubmed: 30396978
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Sep;19(9):1653-61
pubmed: 25917536
JAMA. 2009 Dec 2;302(21):2338-44
pubmed: 19952320
Ann Oncol. 2016 Aug;27(8):1539-46
pubmed: 27177863
Ann Oncol. 2015 Jun;26(6):1188-1194
pubmed: 25712456
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 20;26(12):2013-9
pubmed: 18421054
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 20;30(36):4566-72
pubmed: 23150701
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct 20;31(30):3764-75
pubmed: 24043732