Separation of fluid and solid shear wave fields and quantification of coupling density by magnetic resonance poroelastography.
brain tissue
coupling density
elastography
inversion recovery
phantom
porosity
Journal
Magnetic resonance in medicine
ISSN: 1522-2594
Titre abrégé: Magn Reson Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8505245
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
received:
06
02
2020
revised:
14
08
2020
accepted:
14
08
2020
pubmed:
10
9
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
9
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Biological soft tissues often have a porous architecture comprising fluid and solid compartments. Upon displacement through physiological or externally induced motion, the relative motion of these compartments depends on poroelastic parameters, such as coupling density ( Porosity was measured in eight tofu phantoms and gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) of 21 healthy volunteers. Porosity of tofu was compared to values obtained by fluid draining and microscopy. Solid and fluid shear-strain amplitudes and T IR-MRE allowed for the first time separation of shear strain fields of solid and fluid compartments for measuring coupling density according to the biphasic theory of poroelasticity. Thus, IR-MRE opens horizons for poroelastography-derived imaging markers that can be used in basic research and diagnostic applications.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1655-1668Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Références
Muthupillai R, Lomas DJ, Rossman PJ, Greenleaf JF, Manduca A, Ehman RL. Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. Science. 1995;269:1854-1857.
Franceschini G, Bigoni D, Regitnig P, Holzapfel GA. Brain tissue deforms similarly to filled elastomers and follows consolidation theory. J Mech Phys Solids. 2006;54:2592-2620.
Mcgarry MDJ, Johnson CL, Sutton BP, et al. Suitability of poroelastic and viscoelastic mechanical models for high and low frequency MR elastography. Med Phys. 2015;42:947-957.
Armstrong CG, Mow VC. An analysis of the unconfined compression of articular cartilage. J Biomech Eng. 1984;106:165-173.
Fortin M, Buschmann MD, Bertrand MJ, Foster FS, Ophir J. Dynamic measurement of internal solid displacement in articular cartilage using ultrasound backscatter. J Biomech. 2003;36:443-447.
Righetti R, Garra BS, Mobbs LM. The feasibility of using poroelastographic techniques for distinguishing between normal and lymphedematous tissues in vivo. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:6525.
Biot MA. General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. J Appl Phys. 1941;12:155-164.
Mcgarry M, Van Houten E, Solamen L, Gordon-Wylie S, Weaver J, Paulsen KD. Uniqueness of poroelastic and viscoelastic nonlinear inversion MR elastography at low frequencies. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64:075006.
Hirsch S, Klatt D, Freimann F, Scheel M, Braun J, Sack I. In vivo measurement of volumetric strain in the human brain induced by arterial pulsation and harmonic waves. Magn Reson Med. 2013;70:671-683.
Tan L, McGarry MDJ, Van Houten EEW, et al. A numerical framework for interstitial fluid pressure imaging in poroelastic MRE. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178521.
Biot MA. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid-saturated porous solid. II. Higher frequency range. J Acoust Soc Am. 1956;28:179-191.
Aguilera JM, Stanley DW. Microstructural Principles of Food Processing and Engineering. Gaithersburg, Maryland: Aspen Publishers, Inc; 1999.
Sack I, Schaeffter T. Quantification of Biophysical Parameters in Medical Imaging. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2018.
Nagashima T, Tamaki N, Matsumoto S, Horwitz B, Seguchi Y. Biomechanics of hydrocephalus: A new theoretical model. Neurosurgery. 1987;21:898-904.
Syková E, Nicholson C. Diffusion in brain extracellular space. Physiol Rev. 2008;88:1277-1340.
Parker KJ. A microchannel flow model for soft tissue elasticity. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59:4443-4457.
Parker KJ. Experimental evaluations of the microchannel flow model. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:4227-4242.
Streitberger K, Lilaj L, Schrank F, et al. How tissue fluidity influences brain tumor progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:128-134.
Kawamoto T. Use of a new adhesive film for the preparation of multi-purpose fresh-frozen sections from hard tissues, whole-animals, insects and plants. Arch Histol Cytol. 2003;66:123-143.
Dittmann F, Tzschätzsch H, Hirsch S, et al. Tomoelastography of the abdomen: Tissue mechanical properties of the liver, spleen, kidney, and pancreas from single MR elastography scans at different hydration states. Magn Reson Med. 2017;78:976-983.
Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Friston KJ. Unified segmentation. Neuroimage. 2005;26:839-851.
Debbaut C, Vierendeels J, Casteleyn C, et al. Perfusion characteristics of the human hepatic microcirculation based on three-dimensional reconstructions and computational fluid dynamic analysis. J Biomech Eng. 2012;134:011003.
Wolff S, Balaban RS. Magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and tissue water proton relaxation in vivo. Magn Reson Med. 1989;10:135-144.
Dixon WT, Engels H, Castillo M, Sardashti M. Incidental magnetization transfer contrast in standard multislice imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 1990;8:417-422.
Kamali-Zare P, Nicholson C. Brain extracellular space: geometry, matrix and physiological importance. Basic Clin Neurosci. 2013;4:282-286.
Van Harreveld A, Crowell J, Malhotra SK. A study of extracellular space in central nervous tissue by freeze-substitution. J Cell Biol. 1965;25:117-137.
Van Harreveld A. The extracellular space in the vertebrate central nervous system. In: Bourne GH, ed. The Structure and Function of Nervous Tissue 4. New York: Academic Press, Inc; 1972: 447-511.
Ohno N, Terada N, Saitoh S, Ohno S. Extracellular space in mouse cerebellar cortex revealed by in vivo cryotechnique. Comp Gen Pharmacol. 2007;505:292-301.
Schlageter KE, Molnar P, Lapin GD, Groothuis DR. Microvessel organization and structure in experimental brain tumors: Microvessel populations with distinctive structural and functional properties. Microvasc Res. 1999;58:312-328.
Streitberger K, Wiener E, Hoffmann J, et al. In vivo viscoelastic properties of the brain in normal pressure hydrocephalus. NMR Biomed. 2011;24:385-392.
Perriñez PR, Pattison AJ, Kennedy FE, Weaver JB, Paulsen KD. Contrast detection in fluid-saturated media with magnetic resonance poroelastography. Med Phys. 2010;37:3518-3526.
Pattison AJ, Perrinez PR, Mcgarry M, Weaver JB, Paulsen KD. Feasibility study to measure changes in intracranial pressure using magnetic resonance poroelastography. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Stockholm, Sweden, 2010, p. 3406.
Deoni SCL, Rutt BK, Jones DK. Investigating the effect of exchange and multicomponent T1 relaxation on the short repetition time spoiled steady-state signal and the DESPOT1 T1 quantification method. Magn Reson Med. 2007;25:570-578.
Fehlner A, Hirsch S, Weygandt M, et al. Increasing the spatial resolution and sensitivity of magnetic resonance elastography by correcting for subject motion and susceptibility-induced image distortions. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;46:134-141.