Antithrombin use and mortality in patients with stage IV solid tumor-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation: a nationwide observational study in Japan.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anticoagulants
/ administration & dosage
Antithrombins
/ administration & dosage
Databases, Factual
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation
/ drug therapy
Female
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Intensive Care Units
Japan
/ epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasms
/ complications
Proportional Hazards Models
Thrombomodulin
/ genetics
Treatment Outcome
Anticoagulant
Antithrombin
Disseminated intravascular coagulation
Mortality
Solid tumor
Journal
BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Sep 2020
09 Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
22
04
2020
accepted:
01
09
2020
entrez:
10
9
2020
pubmed:
11
9
2020
medline:
17
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Terminal-stage solid tumors are one of the main causes of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC); effective therapeutic strategies are therefore warranted. This study aimed to investigate the association between mortality and antithrombin therapy in patients with stage IV solid tumor-associated DIC using a large nationwide inpatient database. From July 2010 to March 2018, patients with stage IV solid tumor-associated DIC in the general wards, intensive care unit, or high care unit were identified using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Inpatient Database. Patients who received antithrombin within 3 days of admission were allocated to the antithrombin group, while the remaining patients were allocated to the control group. One-to-four propensity score matching analyses were applied to compare outcomes. The primary outcome was the 28-day in-hospital mortality. Of the 25,299 eligible patients, 919 patients had received antithrombin within 3 days of admission and were matched with 3676 patients in the control group. There were no significant differences in the 28-day mortality between the two groups (control vs. antithrombin: 28.9% vs. 30.3%; hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.23). There were no significant differences in the organ failure score and the proportion of critical bleeding between the two groups. Subgroup analyses showed that the effects of antithrombin were not significantly different among different tumor types. Using a nationwide Japanese inpatient database, this study showed that there is no association between antithrombin administration and 28-day mortality in patients with stage IV solid tumor-associated DIC. Therefore, establishing other therapeutic strategies for solid tumor-associated DIC is required.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Terminal-stage solid tumors are one of the main causes of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC); effective therapeutic strategies are therefore warranted. This study aimed to investigate the association between mortality and antithrombin therapy in patients with stage IV solid tumor-associated DIC using a large nationwide inpatient database.
METHODS
METHODS
From July 2010 to March 2018, patients with stage IV solid tumor-associated DIC in the general wards, intensive care unit, or high care unit were identified using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Inpatient Database. Patients who received antithrombin within 3 days of admission were allocated to the antithrombin group, while the remaining patients were allocated to the control group. One-to-four propensity score matching analyses were applied to compare outcomes. The primary outcome was the 28-day in-hospital mortality.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of the 25,299 eligible patients, 919 patients had received antithrombin within 3 days of admission and were matched with 3676 patients in the control group. There were no significant differences in the 28-day mortality between the two groups (control vs. antithrombin: 28.9% vs. 30.3%; hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.23). There were no significant differences in the organ failure score and the proportion of critical bleeding between the two groups. Subgroup analyses showed that the effects of antithrombin were not significantly different among different tumor types.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Using a nationwide Japanese inpatient database, this study showed that there is no association between antithrombin administration and 28-day mortality in patients with stage IV solid tumor-associated DIC. Therefore, establishing other therapeutic strategies for solid tumor-associated DIC is required.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32907555
doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07375-2
pii: 10.1186/s12885-020-07375-2
pmc: PMC7488043
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticoagulants
0
Antithrombins
0
Thrombomodulin
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
867Subventions
Organisme : Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (JP)
ID : 19AA2007
Organisme : Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (JP)
ID : H30-Policy-Designated-004
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 17H04141
Références
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2014 Oct;38(3):364-71
pubmed: 24823684
J Thromb Haemost. 2014 Sep;12(9):1470-9
pubmed: 24943516
Crit Care Med. 2006 Mar;34(3):625-31
pubmed: 16521260
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Mar 15;173(6):676-82
pubmed: 21330339
BMJ Open. 2013 Apr 29;3(4):
pubmed: 23633419
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2019 Jun;45(4):342-347
pubmed: 31041800
JAMA. 2001 Oct 17;286(15):1869-78
pubmed: 11597289
Crit Care. 2006 Feb;10(1):209
pubmed: 16542481
Biometrics. 1985 Mar;41(1):103-16
pubmed: 4005368
Anticancer Res. 2019 May;39(5):2259-2264
pubmed: 31092417
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3083-107
pubmed: 19757444
Crit Care Med. 2001 Jul;29(7):1303-10
pubmed: 11445675
J Thromb Haemost. 2006 Jan;4(1):90-7
pubmed: 16409457
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2015 Sep;26(6):709-11
pubmed: 26236943
Thromb Haemost. 2016 Apr;115(4):712-28
pubmed: 26676884
Int J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug;20(4):821-8
pubmed: 25385713
Am J Hematol. 2000 Nov;65(3):215-22
pubmed: 11074538
J Intensive Care. 2014 Feb 20;2(1):15
pubmed: 25520831
J Epidemiol. 2016 Oct 5;26(10):530-537
pubmed: 27064132
Thromb Haemost. 2001 Sep;86(3):828-33
pubmed: 11583315
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Feb 15;165(4):453-63
pubmed: 17121864
Scand J Infect Dis. 2003;35(9):545-54
pubmed: 14620133
J Intensive Care. 2014 Mar 06;2(1):20
pubmed: 25520834
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Mar 16;152(6):393-5
pubmed: 20231571
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2007 Oct;33(7):660-6
pubmed: 18000792
J Thromb Haemost. 2018 Mar;16(3):458-461
pubmed: 29316251
J Thromb Haemost. 2018 Mar;16(3):455-457
pubmed: 29316235
Crit Care. 2013 Dec 16;17(6):R297
pubmed: 24342495
J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Mar;14(3):518-30
pubmed: 26670422
Thromb Res. 2018 Apr;164 Suppl 1:S77-S81
pubmed: 29703488