Role of delayed interval debulking for persistent residual disease after more than 5 cycles of chemotherapy for primary advanced ovarian cancer. An international multicenter study.

BACKGROUND

Standard of care in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) is upfront surgery followed by chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) is an alternative in selected patients. Most data exist with IDS following 3-4 cycles chemotherapy, however, some patients experience a delay of IDS. So far, the impact of a "delayed" interval debulking surgery (DID) is poorly defined.

METHODS

We analyzed data from eight international gynecology-oncology referral centers. Patients were included if they had newly diagnosed AOC and were prone to DID (minimum 5 cycles of NACT) between 2011 and 2017.

RESULTS

308 patients underwent DID. 89.6% had a high-grade serous ovarian cancer. The median number of pre-op NACT was 6 cycles (range 5-9) and 6.1% of patients received additionally bevacizumab. The majority of patients had stage-IV disease (51.3%). Median duration of surgery was 210 min (range 34-561), the median surgical complexity score was 4 (range 1-16). Complete resection was achieved in 60.1%. The median number of post-op chemotherapy cycles was 2 (range 0-5). The rate of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo£3°) was 9.7% and 30 days post-op mortality was 0.3%. The median PFS and OS in patients with complete resection was 19.5 and 49.2 months compared to 14.8 and 33.0 months in patients with incomplete resection (p = 0.001), respectively. We did not observe any survival benefit for patients with cytoreduction to small residuals (1-10 mm) compared to residual disease >1 cm.

CONCLUSION

Our data may suggest that offering surgery to patients with persistent disease after 5+ cycles could be associated with favorable outcome if a complete resection is achieved. Patients who had residual disease postoperatively may experience rather peri-operative treatment burden than any benefit from DID.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest H. Plett, O.T. Filippova, J.P. Ramspott, A. Garbi, G.D. Aletti, MZ Muallem, C. Langstraat, S. Phadnis, O. Zivanovic, Y. Sonoda, G. Gardner, A. Traut, F.A. Taran, S. Kommoss, M. Rosendahl, and K. Long Roche have nothing to disclose. P. Harter: Honoraria: Astra Zeneca, Roche, Sotio, Tesaro, Stryker, ASCO, Zai Lab,MSD; Advisory Board: Astra Zeneca, Roche, Tesaro, Lilly, Clovis, Immunogen, MSD/Merck; Research funding (Inst): Astra Zeneca, Roche, GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim,Medac, DFG, European Union, DKH, Tesaro, Genmab. A. du Bois: personal fees fromRoche, personal fees fromAstra Zeneca, personal fees fromTesaro, personal fees from Clovis, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Genmab, personal fees from Pharmar, personal fees from Biocad, outside the submitted work. Dr. Chi reports personal fees from Bovie Medical Co., Verthermia Inc. (now Apyx Medical Corp.), and C Surgeries; is a former stock owner of Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (sold 12/18) and TransEnterix, Inc. (sold 12/18); and served on the Medical Advisory Board of Biom ‘Up (4/19/19). Dr. Chi is funded in part through the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support GrantP30 CA008748. T. Baert has been an advisor for Tesaro and received research grant from Amgen, non-financial support from Amgen, MSD, Roche and Tesaro, outside the submitted work.