User testing of a hypospadias decision aid prototype at a pediatric medical conference.
Decision making
Human-centered design
Hypospadias
Pediatrics
Qualitative research
Journal
Journal of pediatric urology
ISSN: 1873-4898
Titre abrégé: J Pediatr Urol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101233150
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
04
08
2020
accepted:
08
08
2020
pubmed:
14
9
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
13
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Based on our previous qualitative work, we created a web-based decision aid (DA) prototype to facilitate shared decision-making regarding hypospadias. The objective of this study was to obtain rapid feedback on the prototype as part of an iterative, human-centered design process. We conducted this study at a statewide, pediatric educational conference in May 2019, recruiting attendees by verbal/written announcements. The DA consisted of: hypospadias overview and surgery "storyboard," frequently asked questions, parent testimonials, and a values clarification exercise. Participants viewed the DA on a tablet as they participated in semi-structured, qualitative interviews covering website acceptability, usability, and preference for surgical photographs versus illustrations. Three coders used qualitative content analysis to identify themes and resolved disagreements by consensus. Of 295 conference attendees, all 50 who approached us agreed to participate. Responses from 49 participants were available for analysis: 67% female, ages 20-69, 65% Caucasian, 55% MDs. 96% of participants thought the website design matched its purpose; 59.1% preferred surgical illustrations, 8.2% preferred photos, 30.6% preferred both and 2.0% did not like either. Participants recommended improvements in: a) usability/accessibility (e.g. site navigation, visual layout, page length), b) content coverage (e.g. epidemiology, consequences of no/delayed surgery, lifelong risks), c) parent-centeredness (e.g. reading level/writing style) and d) implementation (provider tools, printable handouts). The Extended Summary Figure shows a revised image of the first step of a hypospadias repair based on feedback about participants' preferences for illustrations rather than photographs. The main strength of our study was the valuable feedback we obtained to inform critical revisions of the DA prototype. We also demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of a conducting a usability evaluation of a web-based DA in a medical conference setting. One limitation of this study is that the relatively small population sampled limits generalizability and our findings may not reflect the views of all providers who care for hypospadias patients. The vast majority of providers thought that the design of the Hypospadias Homepage matched its purpose and most preferred surgical illustrations rather than photos to demonstrate the steps of hypospadias surgery. Based on their feedback, we plan to focus our efforts in the following areas: 1) improvement of navigation/menus, 2) reduction in the amount of text per page, 3) expansion of specific content coverage and 4) inclusion of "parent-friendly" visuals such as infographics to represent quantitative data and colorful illustrations to depict hypospadias and its surgical repair.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32919901
pii: S1477-5131(20)30495-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.08.006
pmc: PMC8788200
mid: NIHMS1627799
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
685.e1-685.e8Subventions
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : K23 DK111987
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002529
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to disclose.
Références
Health Expect. 2000 Jun;3(2):125-136
pubmed: 11281919
J Urol. 2014 May;191(5 Suppl):1558-63
pubmed: 24679868
Ann Intensive Care. 2015 Mar 25;5:6
pubmed: 25852965
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Oct;15(5):449.e1-449.e8
pubmed: 31383519
Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Feb;70(1 Suppl):50S-79S
pubmed: 23124615
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Oct;16(5):684.e1-684.e9
pubmed: 32863127
J Rheumatol. 2016 Oct;43(10):1891-1896
pubmed: 27585691
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Apr;16(2):166.e1-166.e8
pubmed: 32061490
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Jun;16(3):307-315
pubmed: 32307325
BMC Surg. 2014 Mar 21;14:16
pubmed: 24655353
Fam Cancer. 2019 Jan;18(1):137-146
pubmed: 29846879
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(5):681-92
pubmed: 9032835
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
J Urol. 2012 Aug;188(2):571-5
pubmed: 22704113
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):780-1
pubmed: 22375967
J Genet Couns. 1999 Aug;8(4):217-33
pubmed: 26142262
Patient Educ Couns. 2002 Jul;47(3):245-55
pubmed: 12088603
Appl Nurs Res. 2017 Jun;35:90-93
pubmed: 28532735
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28;(1):CD001431
pubmed: 24470076
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 19;19(5):e174
pubmed: 28526667
Patient Educ Couns. 1998 Mar;33(3):267-79
pubmed: 9731164
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2002 Sep-Oct;31(5):570-81
pubmed: 12353737
JMIR Hum Factors. 2015 Feb 25;2(1):e2
pubmed: 27025896
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014;113(1):383-95
pubmed: 24210868