Prediction of stillbirth: an umbrella review of evaluation of prognostic variables.

Epidemiology: perinatal fetal medicine: perinatal diagnosis fetal medicine: serum screening systematic reviews ultrasound

Journal

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
ISSN: 1471-0528
Titre abrégé: BJOG
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100935741

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2021
Historique:
accepted: 17 08 2020
pubmed: 16 9 2020
medline: 5 3 2021
entrez: 15 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Stillbirth accounts for over 2 million deaths a year worldwide and rates remains stubbornly high. Multivariable prediction models may be key to individualised monitoring, intervention or early birth in pregnancy to prevent stillbirth. To collate and evaluate systematic reviews of factors associated with stillbirth in order to identify variables relevant to prediction model development. MEDLINE, Embase, DARE and Cochrane Library databases and reference lists were searched up to November 2019. We included systematic reviews of association of individual variables with stillbirth without language restriction. Abstract screening and data extraction were conducted in duplicate. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR and QUIPS criteria. The evidence supporting association with each variable was graded. The search identified 1198 citations. Sixty-nine systematic reviews reporting 64 variables were included. The most frequently reported were maternal age (n = 5), body mass index (n = 6) and maternal diabetes (n = 5). Uterine artery Doppler appeared to have the best performance of any single test for stillbirth. The strongest evidence of association was for nulliparity and pre-existing hypertension. We have identified variables relevant to the development of prediction models for stillbirth. Age, parity and prior adverse pregnancy outcomes had a more convincing association than the best performing tests, which were PAPP-A, PlGF and UtAD. The evidence was limited by high heterogeneity and lack of data on intervention bias. Review shows key predictors for use in developing models predicting stillbirth include age, prior pregnancy outcome and PAPP-A, PLGF and Uterine artery Doppler.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Stillbirth accounts for over 2 million deaths a year worldwide and rates remains stubbornly high. Multivariable prediction models may be key to individualised monitoring, intervention or early birth in pregnancy to prevent stillbirth.
OBJECTIVES
To collate and evaluate systematic reviews of factors associated with stillbirth in order to identify variables relevant to prediction model development.
SEARCH STRATEGY
MEDLINE, Embase, DARE and Cochrane Library databases and reference lists were searched up to November 2019.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included systematic reviews of association of individual variables with stillbirth without language restriction.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Abstract screening and data extraction were conducted in duplicate. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR and QUIPS criteria. The evidence supporting association with each variable was graded.
RESULTS
The search identified 1198 citations. Sixty-nine systematic reviews reporting 64 variables were included. The most frequently reported were maternal age (n = 5), body mass index (n = 6) and maternal diabetes (n = 5). Uterine artery Doppler appeared to have the best performance of any single test for stillbirth. The strongest evidence of association was for nulliparity and pre-existing hypertension.
CONCLUSION
We have identified variables relevant to the development of prediction models for stillbirth. Age, parity and prior adverse pregnancy outcomes had a more convincing association than the best performing tests, which were PAPP-A, PlGF and UtAD. The evidence was limited by high heterogeneity and lack of data on intervention bias.
TWEETABLE ABSTRACT
Review shows key predictors for use in developing models predicting stillbirth include age, prior pregnancy outcome and PAPP-A, PLGF and Uterine artery Doppler.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32931648
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16510
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

238-250

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/P027938/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Society (SANDS)

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Blencowe H, Cousens S, Jassir FB, Say L, Chou D, Mathers C, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Heal 2016;4:e98-108.
ONS. Childhood Mortality in England and Wales - Office for National Statistics. London: ONS; 2017.
Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P, Frøen JF, Smith GC, Gibbons K, et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2011;377:1331-40.
Bhutta ZA, Darmstadt GL, Haws RA, Yakoob MY, Lawn JE. Delivering interventions to reduce the global burden of stillbirths: improving service supply and community demand. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2009;9 (Suppl 1):S7.
NHS England. Saving Babies' Lives A Care Bundle for Reducing Stillbirth. Leeds: NHS England; 2016.
Heazell AEP, Whitworth MK, Whitcombe J, Glover SW, Bevan C, Brewin J, et al. Research priorities for stillbirth: process overview and results from UK Stillbirth Priority Setting Partnership. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;46:641-7.
The Investigation and Management of the Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetus: Greentop Guideline 31.London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2013.
Gardosi J, Kady SM, McGeown P, Francis A, Tonks A. Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort study. BMJ 2005;331:1113-7.
Conde-Agudelo A, Bird S, Kennedy SH, Villar J, Papageorghiou AT. First- and second-trimester tests to predict stillbirth in unselected pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2015;122:41-55.
Akolekar R, Tokunaka M, Ortega N, Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of stillbirth from maternal factors, fetal biometry and uterine artery Doppler at 19-24 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;48:624-30.
An JJ, Ji HY, You JY, Woo SY, Choi SJ, Oh S, et al. Introduction of a nomogram for predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes based on maternal serum markers in the quad screen test. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015;292:589-94.
Steyerberg EW. Clinical Prediction Models. New York, NY: Springer (Statistics for Biology and Health); 2009.
Henderson LK, Craig JC, Willis NS, Tovey D, Webster AC. How to write a Cochrane systematic review. Nephrology 2010;15:617-24.
NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Systematic Reviews: CRD's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care. York: University of York, 2009.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007;370:1453-7.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009;339.b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700.
Aminu M, Unkels R, Mdegela M, Utz B, Adaji S, van den Broek N. Causes of and factors associated with stillbirth in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review. BJOG 2014;121 (Suppl):141-53.
Kayode GA, Grobbee DE, Amoakoh-Coleman M, Adeleke IT, Ansah E, de Groot JAH, et al. Predicting stillbirth in a low resource setting. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016;16:1-8.
Haws RA, Yakoob M, Soomro T, Menezes EV, Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA. Reducing stillbirths: screening and monitoring during pregnancy and labour. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2009;9 (Suppl 1):S5.
Shea BJ, Bouter LM, Peterson J, Boers M, Andersson N, Ortiz Z, et al. External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). PLoS One 2007;2:e1350.
Bellou V, Belbasis L, Tzoulaki I, Evangelou E, Ioannidis JPA. Environmental risk factors and Parkinson's disease: an umbrella review of meta-analyses. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2016;23:1-9.
Altman DG, Bland JM. How to obtain the P value from a confidence interval. BMJ 2011;343:d2304.
Muglu J, Rather H, Arroyo-Manzano D, Bhattacharya S, Balchin I, Khalil A, et al. Risks of stillbirth and neonatal death with advancing gestation at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies of 15 million pregnancies. PLoS Med 2019;16:e1002838.
Amegah AK, Klevor MK, Wagner CL. Maternal vitamin D insufficiency and risk of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. PLoS One 2017;12:e0173605.
Murphy VE, Wang G, Namazy JA, Powell H, Gibson PG, Chambers C, et al. The risk of congenital malformations, perinatal mortality and neonatal hospitalisation among pregnant women with asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2013;120:812-22.
Nevis IF, Reitsma A, Dominic A, McDonald S, Thabane L, Akl EA, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011;6:2587-98.
Oteng-Ntim E, Meeks D, Seed PT, Webster L, Howard J, Doyle P, et al. Adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with sickle cell disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood 2015;125:3316-25.
Rusner M, Berg M, Begley C. Bipolar disorder in pregnancy and childbirth: a systematic review of outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016;16:331.
Upala S, Yong WC, Sanguankeo A. Association between primary Sjögren's syndrome and pregnancy complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rheumatol 2016;35:1949-55.
Webb R, Abel K, Pickles A, Appleby L. Mortality in offspring of parents with psychotic disorders: a critical review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2005;162:1045-56.
Wang Z, Kanguru L, Hussein J, Fitzmaurice A, Ritchie K. Incidence of adverse outcomes associated with gestational diabetes mellitus in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2013;121:14-9.
Wu J, Ma J, Zhang WH, Di W. Management and outcomes of pregnancy with or without lupus nephritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2018;14:885-901.
Glavind MT, Møllgaard MV, Iversen ML, Arendt LH, Forman A. Obstetrical outcome in women with endometriosis including spontaneous hemoperitoneum and bowel perforation: a systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018;51:41-52.
Brown NT, Turner JM, Kumar S. The intrapartum and perinatal risks of sleep-disordered breathing in pregnancy: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;219:147-61.e1.
Warland J, Dorrian J, Morrison JL, O'Brien LM. Maternal sleep during pregnancy and poor fetal outcomes: a scoping review of the literature with meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev 2018;41:197-219.
Zhao J, Xu B, Zhang Q, Li YP. Which one has a better obstetric and perinatal outcome in singleton pregnancy, IVF/ICSI or FET?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2016;14:51.
Cavoretto P, Candiani M, Giorgione V, Inversetti A, Abu-Saba MM, Tiberio F, et al. Risk of spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies conceived after IVF/ICSI treatment: meta-analysis of cohort studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018;51:43-53.
Balsells M, García-Patterson A, Gich I, Corcoy R. Maternal and fetal outcome in women with type 2 versus type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;94:4284-91.
Gizzo S, Patrelli TS, Rossanese M, Noventa M, Berretta R, Di Gangi S, et al. An update on diabetic women obstetrical outcomes linked to preconception and pregnancy glycemic profile: a systematic literature review. Sci World J 2013;2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/254901.
Yu L, Zeng X-L, Cheng M-L, Yang G-Z, Wang B, Xiao Z-W, et al. Quantitative assessment of the effect of pre-gestational diabetes and risk of adverse maternal, perinatal and neonatal outcomes. Oncotarget 2017;8:61048-56.
Ananth CV, Savitz DA. Vaginal bleeding and adverse reproductive outcomes: a meta-analysis. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1994;8:62-78.
Downes KL, Grantz KL, Shenassa ED. Maternal, labor, delivery, and perinatal outcomes associated with placental abruption: a systematic review. Am J Perinatol 2017;34:935-57.
Berhan Y, Berhan A. A meta-analysis of selected maternal and fetal factors for perinatal mortality. Ethiop J Health Sci 2014;24 (Suppl):55-68.
Bradford B, Thompson JM, Heazell A, McCowan LM, McKinlay C. Understanding the associations and significance of fetal movements in overweight or obese pregnant women: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2018;97:13-24.
Liu Y, Ma X, Zheng J, Liu X, Yan T. Pregnancy outcomes in patients with acute kidney injury during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017;17:1-9.
Mohan M, Antonios A, Konje J, Lindow S, Ahmed Syed M, Akobeng A. Stillbirth and associated perinatal outcomes in obstetric cholestasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X 2019;3:100026.
Ovadia C, Seed PT, Sklavounos A, Geenes V, Di Illio C, Chambers J, et al. Association of adverse perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with biochemical markers: results of aggregate and individual patient data meta-analyses. Lancet 2019;393:899-909.
Lamont K, Scott NW, Jones GT, Bhattacharya S. Risk of recurrent stillbirth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2015;350:h3080.
Malacova E, Regan A, Nassar N, Raynes-Greenow C, Leonard H, Srinivasjois R, et al. Risk of stillbirth, preterm delivery and fetal growth restriction following exposure in previous birth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2018;125:183-92.
Moraitis AA, Oliver-Williams C, Wood AM, Fleming M, Pell JP, Smith GCS. Previous cesarean delivery and the risk of unexplained stillbirth: retrospective cohort study and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2016;71:5-6.
O'Neill SM, Kearney PM, Kenny LC, Khashan AS, Henriksen TB, Lutomski JE, et al. Caesarean delivery and subsequent stillbirth or miscarriage: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013;8:e54588.
Keag OE, Norman JE, Stock SJ. Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2018;15:1-22.
Aune D, Saugstad OD, Henriksen T, Tonstad S. Maternal body mass index and the risk of fetal death, stillbirth, and infant death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2014;311:1536-46.
Gibbs CM, Wendt A, Peters S, Hogue CJ. The impact of early age at first childbirth on maternal and infant health. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2012;26 (Suppl 1):259-84.
Chu SY, Kim SY, Lau J, Schmid CH, Dietz PM, Callaghan WM, et al. Maternal obesity and risk of stillbirth: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:223-8.
Liu P, Xu L, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Du Y, Sun Y, et al. Association between perinatal outcomes and maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index. Obes Rev 2016;17:1091-102.
Marchi J, Berg M, Dencker A, Olander EK, Begley C. Risks associated with obesity in pregnancy, for the mother and baby: a systematic review of reviews. Obes Rev 2015;16:621-38.
Slack E, Rankin J, Jones D, Heslehurst N. Effects of maternal anthropometrics on pregnancy outcomes in South Asian women: a systematic review. Obes Rev 2018;19:485-500.
Shah PS, Zao J, Al-Wassia H, Shah V. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of aboriginal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Womens Heal Issues 2011;21:28-39.
Vos AA, Posthumus AG, Bonsel GJ, Steegers EAP, Denktaş S. Deprived neighborhoods and adverse perinatal outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014;93:727-40.
Weightman AL, Morgan HE, Shepherd MA, Kitcher H, Roberts C, Dunstan FD. Social inequality and infant health in the UK: systematic review and meta-analyses. BMJ Open 2012;2:e000964.
Leonardi-Bee J, Britton J, Venn A. Secondhand smoke and adverse fetal outcomes in nonsmoking pregnant women: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2011;127:734-41.
Marufu TC, Ahankari A, Coleman T, Lewis S. Maternal smoking and the risk of still birth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2015;15:239.
Pineles BL, Hsu S, Park E, Samet JM. Systematic review and meta-analyses of perinatal death and maternal exposure to tobacco smoke during pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol 2016;184:87-97.
Carolan M, Frankowska D. Advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome: a review of the evidence. Midwifery 2011;27:793-801.
Greenwood DC, Thatcher NJ, Ye J, Garrard L, Keogh G, King LG, et al. Caffeine intake during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol 2014;29:725-34.
Wikoff D, Welsh BT, Henderson R, Brorby GP, Britt J, Myers E, et al. Systematic review of the potential adverse effects of caffeine consumption in healthy adults, pregnant women, adolescents, and children. Food Chem Toxicol 2017;109:585-648.
Henderson J, Gray R, Brocklehurst P. Systematic review of effects of low-moderate prenatal alcohol exposure on pregnancy outcome. BJOG 2007;114:243-52.
Inamdar AS, Croucher RE, Chokhandre MK, Mashyakhy MH, Marinho VCC. Maternal smokeless tobacco use in pregnancy and adverse health outcomes in newborns: a systematic review. Nicotine Tob Res 2015;17:1058-66.
Di Mario S, Say L, Lincetto O. Risk factors for stillbirth in developing countries: a systematic review of the literature. Sex Transm Dis 2007;34 (7 Suppl):S11-21.
Allen RE, Morlando M, Thilaganathan B, Zamora J, Khan KS, Thangaratinam S, et al. Predictive accuracy of second-trimester uterine artery Doppler indices for stillbirth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;47:22-7.
Mondal D, Galloway TS, Bailey TC, Mathews F. Elevated risk of stillbirth in males: systematic review and meta-analysis of more than 30 million births. BMC Med 2014;12:220.
Moreta D, Vo S, Eslick GD, Benzie R. Re-evaluating the role of cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019;242:17-28.
Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs CA, De Boer MA, Heymans MW, Schoonmade LJ, Bossuyt PMM, Mol BWJ, et al. Prognostic accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery Doppler for adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018;51:313-22.
Abou-Nassar K, Carrier M, Ramsay T, Rodger MA. The association between antiphospholipid antibodies and placenta mediated complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Res 2011;128:77-85.
Huang L, Sauve R, Birkett N, Fergusson D, Van Walraven C. Maternal age and risk of stillbirth: a systematic review. CMAJ 2008;178:165-72.
Alfirevic Z, Roberts D, Martlew V. How strong is the association between maternal thrombophilia and adverse pregnancy outcome? A systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002;101:6-14.
Heazell AE, Hayes DJ, Whitworth M, Takwoingi Y, Bayliss SE, Davenport C. Biochemical tests of placental function versus ultrasound assessment of fetal size for stillbirth and small-for-gestational-age infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;(5):CD012245.
Jung J, Rahman MM, Rahman MS, Swe KT, Islam MR, Rahman MO, et al. Effects of hemoglobin levels during pregnancy on adverse maternal and infant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2019;1450:69-82.
Young MF, Oaks BM, Tandon S, Martorell R, Dewey KG, Wendt AS. Maternal hemoglobin concentrations across pregnancy and maternal and child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2019;1450:47-68.
Thangaratinam S, Ismail KMK, Sharp S, Coomarasamy A, Khan KS. Accuracy of serum uric acid in predicting complications of pre-eclampsia: a systematic review. BJOG 2006;113:369-78.
Sherrell H, Dunn L, Clifton V, Kumar S. Systematic review of maternal placental growth factor levels in late pregnancy as a predictor of adverse intrapartum and perinatal outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018;225:26-34.
Thangaratinam S, Coomarasamy A, O'Mahony F, Sharp S, Zamora J, Khan KS, et al. Estimation of proteinuria as a predictor of complications of pre-eclampsia: a systematic review. BMC Med 2009;7:10.
Hui D, Okun N, Murphy K, Kingdom J, Uleryk E, Shah PS. Combinations of maternal serum markers to predict preeclampsia, small for gestational age, and stillbirth: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2012;34:142-53.
Conde-Agudelo A, Villar J, Kennedy SH, Papageorghiou AT. Predictive accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio for adverse perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcomes in suspected fetal growth restriction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018;52:430-41.
Lean SC, Derricott H, Jones RL, Heazell AEP. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2017;12:1-15.
Berhan Y, Berhan A. A meta-analysis of socio-demographic factors for perinatal mortality in developing countries: a subgroup analysis of the national surveys and small scale studies. Ethiop J Health Sci 2014;24:41-54.
Oldereid NB, Wennerholm U-B, Pinborg A, Loft A, Laivuori H, Petzold M, et al. The effect of paternal factors on perinatal and paediatric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2018;24:320-89.
Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Writing Group. Association between stillbirth and risk factors known at pregnancy confirmation. JAMA 2011;306:2469-79.
Kleinrouweler CE, Cheong-See F, Collins G, Kwee A, Thangaratinam S, Khan KS, et al. Prognostic models in obstetrics: available, but far from applicable. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214:79-90.
Smith GCS, Yu CKH, Papageorghiou AT, Cacho AM, Nicolaides KH. Maternal uterine artery Doppler flow velocimetry and the risk of stillbirth level of evidence: II. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:144-51.
Trudell AS, Tuuli MG, Colditz GA, Macones GA, Odibo AO. A stillbirth calculator: development & internal validation of a clinical prediction model to quantify stillbirth risk. PLoS One 2017;12:1-13.
Iliodromiti S, Mackay DF, Smith GCS, Pell JP, Sattar N, Lawlor DA, et al. Customised and noncustomised birth weight centiles and prediction of stillbirth and infant mortality and morbidity: a cohort study of 979,912 term singleton pregnancies in Scotland. PLoS Med 2017;14:e1002228.
Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons K. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement. BMC Med 2015;13:1.
Lockie E, Mccarthy EA, Hui L, Churilov L. Feasibility of using self-reported ethnicity in pregnancy according to the gestation-related optimal weight classification: a cross-sectional study. BJOG 2018;125:704-9.
Riley RD, Snell KIE, Ensor J, Burke DL, Harrell FE, Moons KGM, et al. Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: Part I - Continuous outcomes. Stat Med 2019;38:1262-75.
Abo-Zaid G, Sauerbrei W, Riley RD. Individual participant data meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies: state of the art? BMC Med Res Methodol 2012;12:56.
Khan KS, Bachmann LM, ter Riet G. Systematic reviews with individual patient data meta-analysis to evaluate diagnostic tests. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003;108:121-5.

Auteurs

R Townsend (R)

Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's, University of London and St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Fetal Medicine Unit, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

F G Sileo (FG)

Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's, University of London and St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Fetal Medicine Unit, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

J Allotey (J)

Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

J Dodds (J)

Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Centre for Women's Health, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

A Heazell (A)

St Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

L Jorgensen (L)

Katie's Team, East London, UK.

V B Kim (VB)

The Robinson Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

L Magee (L)

Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

B Mol (B)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.

J Sandall (J)

Health Service and Population Research Department, Centre for Implementation Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Women and Children's Health, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.

Gcs Smith (G)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK.
Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, Centre for Trophoblast Research (CTR), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

B Thilaganathan (B)

Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's, University of London and St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Fetal Medicine Unit, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

P von Dadelszen (P)

Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

S Thangaratinam (S)

Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

A Khalil (A)

Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's, University of London and St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Fetal Medicine Unit, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH