High hepatitis C treatment uptake among people with recent drug dependence in New South Wales, Australia.


Journal

Journal of hepatology
ISSN: 1600-0641
Titre abrégé: J Hepatol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8503886

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2021
Historique:
received: 23 06 2020
revised: 11 08 2020
accepted: 31 08 2020
pubmed: 16 9 2020
medline: 21 1 2022
entrez: 15 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

High HCV treatment uptake among people at most risk of transmission is essential to achieve elimination. We aimed to characterise subpopulations of people with HCV based on drug dependence, to estimate direct-acting antiviral (DAA) uptake in an unrestricted treatment era, and to evaluate factors associated with treatment uptake among people with recent drug dependence. HCV notifications in New South Wales, Australia (1995-2017) were linked to opioid agonist therapy (OAT), hospitalisations, incarcerations, HIV notifications, deaths, and prescription databases. Drug dependence was defined as hospitalisation due to injectable drugs or receipt of OAT, with indicators in 2016-2018 considered recent. Records were weighted to account for spontaneous clearance. Logistic regression was used to analyse factors associated with treatment uptake among those with recent drug dependence. 57,467 people were estimated to have chronic HCV throughout the DAA era. Treatment uptake was highest among those with recent (47%), compared to those with distant (38%), and no (33%) drug dependence. Among those with recent drug dependence, treatment was more likely among those with HIV (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.71; 95% CI 1.24-2.36), recent incarceration (aOR 1.10; 95% CI 1.01-1.19), and history of alcohol use disorder (aOR 1.22; 95% CI 1.13-1.31). Treatment was less likely among women (aOR 0.78; 95% CI 0.72-0.84), patients of Indigenous ethnicity (aOR 0.75; 95% CI 0.69-0.81), foreign-born individuals (aOR 0.86; 95% CI 0.78-0.96), those with outer-metropolitan notifications (aOR 0.90; 95% CI 0.82-0.98), HBV coinfection (aOR 0.69; 95% CI 0.59-0.80), and >1 recent hospitalisation (aOR: 0.91; 95% CI 0.84-0.98). These data provide evidence of high DAA uptake among people with recent drug dependence, including those who are incarcerated. Enhancing this encouraging initial uptake among high-risk populations will be essential to achieve HCV elimination. To facilitate HCV elimination, those at highest risk of infection and transmission are a treatment priority. This study shows the successes of Australia's universal provision of DAA therapy in reducing the barriers to treatment which have historically persisted among people who inject drugs. Despite higher DAA therapy uptake among those with recent drug dependence, gaps remain. Strategies which aim to reduce marginalisation and increase treatment uptake to ensure equitable HCV elimination must be advanced.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND & AIMS
High HCV treatment uptake among people at most risk of transmission is essential to achieve elimination. We aimed to characterise subpopulations of people with HCV based on drug dependence, to estimate direct-acting antiviral (DAA) uptake in an unrestricted treatment era, and to evaluate factors associated with treatment uptake among people with recent drug dependence.
METHODS
HCV notifications in New South Wales, Australia (1995-2017) were linked to opioid agonist therapy (OAT), hospitalisations, incarcerations, HIV notifications, deaths, and prescription databases. Drug dependence was defined as hospitalisation due to injectable drugs or receipt of OAT, with indicators in 2016-2018 considered recent. Records were weighted to account for spontaneous clearance. Logistic regression was used to analyse factors associated with treatment uptake among those with recent drug dependence.
RESULTS
57,467 people were estimated to have chronic HCV throughout the DAA era. Treatment uptake was highest among those with recent (47%), compared to those with distant (38%), and no (33%) drug dependence. Among those with recent drug dependence, treatment was more likely among those with HIV (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.71; 95% CI 1.24-2.36), recent incarceration (aOR 1.10; 95% CI 1.01-1.19), and history of alcohol use disorder (aOR 1.22; 95% CI 1.13-1.31). Treatment was less likely among women (aOR 0.78; 95% CI 0.72-0.84), patients of Indigenous ethnicity (aOR 0.75; 95% CI 0.69-0.81), foreign-born individuals (aOR 0.86; 95% CI 0.78-0.96), those with outer-metropolitan notifications (aOR 0.90; 95% CI 0.82-0.98), HBV coinfection (aOR 0.69; 95% CI 0.59-0.80), and >1 recent hospitalisation (aOR: 0.91; 95% CI 0.84-0.98).
CONCLUSIONS
These data provide evidence of high DAA uptake among people with recent drug dependence, including those who are incarcerated. Enhancing this encouraging initial uptake among high-risk populations will be essential to achieve HCV elimination.
LAY SUMMARY
To facilitate HCV elimination, those at highest risk of infection and transmission are a treatment priority. This study shows the successes of Australia's universal provision of DAA therapy in reducing the barriers to treatment which have historically persisted among people who inject drugs. Despite higher DAA therapy uptake among those with recent drug dependence, gaps remain. Strategies which aim to reduce marginalisation and increase treatment uptake to ensure equitable HCV elimination must be advanced.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32931879
pii: S0168-8278(20)33618-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.08.038
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Analgesics, Opioid 0
Antiviral Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

293-302

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest GD reports grants from Gilead, Abbvie, Merck, and Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Gilead, Abbvie, and Merck, and non-financial support from Gilead, Abbvie, and Merck, outside the submitted work. JGrebely reports grants from Merck, grants from Cepheid, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Abbvie, grants and personal fees from Gilead Sciences, grants and personal fees from Merck, grants and personal fees from Cepheid, grants from Hologic, grants from Indivior, outside the submitted work. ML reports grants from Gilead, ViiV Healthcare and Janssen outside the submitted work. MK reports receiving grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Hologic, Merck, Roche Molecular Systems, and Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics outside of the submitted work. JGeorge reports funding from MSD, Abbvie, BMS, Pharmaxis, Norvartis, Cincera, and Bayer outside the submitted work. BH reports grants from NSW Health and Cancer Council NSW. LD has received investigator-initiated untied educational grants for studies of opioid medications in Australia from Indivior, Mundipharma and Seqirus. All remaining authors have no potential conflicts to declare. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details.

Auteurs

Heather Valerio (H)

The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: hvalerio@kirby.unsw.edu.au.

Maryam Alavi (M)

The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Matthew Law (M)

The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Shane Tillakeratne (S)

The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Janaki Amin (J)

The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Health Systems and Populations, Maquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Naveed Z Janjua (NZ)

British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, Canada; School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Mel Krajden (M)

British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Jacob George (J)

Storr Liver Centre, Westmead Millennium Institute, University of Sydney and Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia.

Gail V Matthews (GV)

The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Behzad Hajarizadeh (B)

The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Louisa Degenhardt (L)

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Jason Grebely (J)

The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Gregory J Dore (GJ)

The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH