Efficacy of Staple Line Reinforcement With Omentopexy During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Postoperative Complications: Experience of a Single Center.
Journal
Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques
ISSN: 1534-4908
Titre abrégé: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100888751
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Sep 2020
15 Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
13
05
2020
accepted:
14
08
2020
pubmed:
18
9
2020
medline:
28
10
2021
entrez:
17
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to evaluate the protective effects of staple line reinforcement with omentopexy during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on postoperative complications. A total of 3942 laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy cases were included in the study. All the patients were divided into 3 groups: No reinforcement (NoSLR), staple line reinforcement with fibrin glue (SLR-FG), and staple line reinforcement with omentopexy (SLR-O). Demographic data and perioperative characteristics of the groups were analyzed retrospectively. Among these, age, sex, preoperative comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, body mass index, duration of operation, reoperation, complications, and Clavien-Dindo classification scores were recorded. Age, sex, body mass index, comorbid diseases, American Society of Anesthesiologists, and Clavien-Dindo Classification scores were similar in all the groups. The overall complication rate was 3.0%. The overall minor and major complication rates were 1.7% and 1.3%, respectively. The mortality rate was 0.1% (4 patients). The most common postoperative complications were bleeding (0.9%) and leakage (0.5%). The incidence of leakage, bleeding, and twisted gastric sleeve rates were similar when compared between SLR-FG and NoSLR. In the SLR-O patients, the incidence of leakage, hemorrhage, and twist were significantly lower and the operation time was significantly longer when compared with the other groups. The SLR-O technique, especially when performed by experienced surgeons, is a promising method for the prevention of postoperative leakage, bleeding, and twist complications with an acceptable increase in the duration of operation. Considering the limited effects of the SLR-FG technique, it was predicted that it would lose its popularity over time.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to evaluate the protective effects of staple line reinforcement with omentopexy during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on postoperative complications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
A total of 3942 laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy cases were included in the study. All the patients were divided into 3 groups: No reinforcement (NoSLR), staple line reinforcement with fibrin glue (SLR-FG), and staple line reinforcement with omentopexy (SLR-O). Demographic data and perioperative characteristics of the groups were analyzed retrospectively. Among these, age, sex, preoperative comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, body mass index, duration of operation, reoperation, complications, and Clavien-Dindo classification scores were recorded.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Age, sex, body mass index, comorbid diseases, American Society of Anesthesiologists, and Clavien-Dindo Classification scores were similar in all the groups. The overall complication rate was 3.0%. The overall minor and major complication rates were 1.7% and 1.3%, respectively. The mortality rate was 0.1% (4 patients). The most common postoperative complications were bleeding (0.9%) and leakage (0.5%). The incidence of leakage, bleeding, and twisted gastric sleeve rates were similar when compared between SLR-FG and NoSLR. In the SLR-O patients, the incidence of leakage, hemorrhage, and twist were significantly lower and the operation time was significantly longer when compared with the other groups.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The SLR-O technique, especially when performed by experienced surgeons, is a promising method for the prevention of postoperative leakage, bleeding, and twist complications with an acceptable increase in the duration of operation. Considering the limited effects of the SLR-FG technique, it was predicted that it would lose its popularity over time.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32941357
pii: 00129689-202104000-00011
doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000863
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
181-187Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
Références
World Health Organization, Obesity and Overweight, WHO; 2018. Available at: www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight. Accessed April 2020.
Ali M, El Chaar M, Ghiassi S, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Clinical Issues Committee. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery updated position statement on sleeve gastrectomy as a bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13:1652–1657.
Parikh M, Issa R, McCrillis A, et al. Surgical strategies that may decrease leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9991 cases. Ann Surg. 2013;257:231–237.
Gagner M, Buchwald JN. Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in four staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10:713–723.
Carandina S, Tabbara M, Bossi M, et al. Staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: absorbable monofilament, barbed suture, fibrin glue, or nothing? Results of a prospective randomized study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20:361–366.
Coskun H, Yardimci E. Effects and results of fibrin sealant use in 1000 laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy cases. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:2174–2179.
Cunningham-Hill M, Mazzei M, Zhao H, et al. The impact of staple line reinforcement utilization on bleeding and leak rates following sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity: a propensity and case-control matched analysis. Obes Surg. 2019;29:2449–2463.
Gagner M, Hutchinson C, Rosenthal R. Fifth International Consensus Conference: current status of sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:750–756.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213.
Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: The SM-BOSS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018;319:255–265.
Salminen P, Helmiö M, Ovaska J, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity: The SLEEVEPASS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018;319:241–254.
Paral J, Lochman P, Blazej S, et al. Glued versus stapled anastomosis of the colon: an experimental study to determine comparative resistance to intraluminal pressure. Asian J Surg. 2014;37:154–161.
El Chaar M, Stoltzfus J. Assessment of sleeve gastrectomy surgical technique: first look at 30-day outcomes based on the MBSAQIP database. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;227:564–572.
Demeusy A, Sill A, Averbach A. Current role of staple line reinforcement in 30-day outcomes of primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: an analysis of MBSAQIP data, 2015-2016 PUF. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:1454–1461.
El Moussaoui I, Limbga A, Mehdi A. Staple line reinforcement during sleeve gastrectomy with a new type of reinforced stapler. Minerva Chir. 2018;73:127–132.
Wang Z, Dai X, Xie H, et al. The efficacy of staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2016;25:145–152.
Lynn W, Ilczyszyn A, Aguilo R, et al. Standardised sleeve gastrectomy without reinforcement. JSLS. 2018;22:e2018.00015.
Guerrier JB, Mehaffey JH, Schirmer BD, et al. Reinforcement of the staple line during gastric sleeve: a comparison of buttressing or oversewing, versus no reinforcement—a single-institution study. Am Surg. 2018;84:690–694.
Gayrel X, Loureiro M, Skalli EM, et al. Clinical and economic evaluation of absorbable staple line buttressing in sleeve gastrectomy in high-risk patients. Obes Surg. 2016;26:1710–1716.
Gagner M, Kemmeter P. Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in five staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:396–407.
Batman B, Altun H. Benefits of suture reinforcement in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2019;29:539–542.
Arslan E, Banli O, Sipahi M, et al. Effects and results of omentopexy during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018;28:174–177.
Sabry K, Qassem MG. The impact of routine omentopexy to staple line on the incidence of early postoperative complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: is it worth? Egypt J Surg. 2018;37:479–484.
Elbalshy MA, Fayed AM, Abdelshahid MA, et al. Role of staple line fixation during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Int Surg J. 2018;5:156–161.
Afaneh C, Costa R, Pomp A, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of omentopexy during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in reducing postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:41–47.
Abd Ellatif ME, Abbas A, El Nakeeb A, et al. Management options for twisted gastric tube after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2017;27:2404–2409.
Rebecchi F, Allaix ME, Patti MG, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and morbid obesity: to sleeve or not to sleeve? World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23:2269–2275.
Filho AMM, Silva LB, Godoy ES, et al. Omentopexy in sleeve gastrectomy reduces early gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2019;29:155–161.
Våge V, Behme J, Jossart G, et al. Gastropexy predicts lower use of acid-reducing medication after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. A prospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2020;74:113–117.
Soong TC, Almalki OM, Lee WJ, et al. Revision of sleeve gastrectomy with hiatal repair with gastropexy for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Obes Surg. 2019;29:2381–2386.
Rebibo L, Dhahri A, Chati R, et al. Effectiveness of fibrin sealant application on the development of staple line complications after sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2018;268:762–768.
Musella M, Milone M, Maietta P, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: efficacy of fibrin sealant in reducing postoperative bleeding. A randomized controlled trial. Updates Surg. 2014;66:197–201.
Nordentoft T, Pommergaard HC, Rosenberg J, et al. Fibrin glue does not improve healing of gastrointestinal anastomoses: a systematic review. Eur Surg Res. 2015;54:1–13.