Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as a Preferred Revisional Bariatric Surgery After a Failed Silastic Ring Vertical Gastroplasty.
Bariatric surgery
Elderly
Sleeve gastrectomy
Journal
Obesity surgery
ISSN: 1708-0428
Titre abrégé: Obes Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9106714
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
17
06
2020
accepted:
10
09
2020
revised:
07
09
2020
pubmed:
20
9
2020
medline:
20
4
2021
entrez:
19
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Over the years, the silastic ring vertical gastroplasty (SRVG) has shown poor long-term outcomes with both weight regain and complications. Therefore, most bariatric surgeons have been presented with the need to perform a successful and safe conversion procedure. Yet the preferred and recommended conversion surgery regarding weight loss, comorbidity improvement, and postoperative complications remains under debate. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of conversion from SRVG with either Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) or one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). A retrospective study was conducted from our bariatric surgery units' database. We reviewed the files of patients who underwent either a RYGBP or OAGB after a previous SRVG. Demographics, obesity-related comorbidities, BMI before and after the procedure, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay were analyzed. Between May 2008 and August 2018, fifty-four patients underwent conversion from a failed SRVG. Twenty-one patients underwent conversion to OAGB (39%), and thirty-three patients underwent conversion to RYGBP (61%). Major complications were reported in 9.5% of the OAGB group and 15.1% of the RYGBP group. At a mean follow-up of 28 months, the OAGB group achieved a 78.5% excess BMI loss compared with 57.6% in the RYGBP group (p = 0.137). One patient (4.7%) of the OGBP group and 5 (15.1%) of the RYGBP group needed reoperations due to complications (p = 0.224). The OGBP is gaining popularity and evidence as an effective and safe procedure. Here we show the successful utilization of the OGBP, when compared with RYGBP, as a revisional procedure after SRVG.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Over the years, the silastic ring vertical gastroplasty (SRVG) has shown poor long-term outcomes with both weight regain and complications. Therefore, most bariatric surgeons have been presented with the need to perform a successful and safe conversion procedure. Yet the preferred and recommended conversion surgery regarding weight loss, comorbidity improvement, and postoperative complications remains under debate.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of conversion from SRVG with either Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) or one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
A retrospective study was conducted from our bariatric surgery units' database. We reviewed the files of patients who underwent either a RYGBP or OAGB after a previous SRVG. Demographics, obesity-related comorbidities, BMI before and after the procedure, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay were analyzed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Between May 2008 and August 2018, fifty-four patients underwent conversion from a failed SRVG. Twenty-one patients underwent conversion to OAGB (39%), and thirty-three patients underwent conversion to RYGBP (61%). Major complications were reported in 9.5% of the OAGB group and 15.1% of the RYGBP group. At a mean follow-up of 28 months, the OAGB group achieved a 78.5% excess BMI loss compared with 57.6% in the RYGBP group (p = 0.137). One patient (4.7%) of the OGBP group and 5 (15.1%) of the RYGBP group needed reoperations due to complications (p = 0.224).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The OGBP is gaining popularity and evidence as an effective and safe procedure. Here we show the successful utilization of the OGBP, when compared with RYGBP, as a revisional procedure after SRVG.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32949347
doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04972-9
pii: 10.1007/s11695-020-04972-9
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dimethylpolysiloxanes
0
baysilon
63148-62-9
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
654-658Références
Stefanidis D, Malireddy K, Kuwada T, et al. Revisional bariatric surgery: perioperative morbidity is determined by type of procedure. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(12):4504–10.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3097-y
Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. IFSO worldwide survey 2016: primary, endoluminal, and revisional procedures. Obes Surg. 2018;28(12):3783–94.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3450-2
Miller K, Pump A, Hell E. Vertical banded gastroplasty versus adjustable gastric banding: prospective long-term follow-up study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:84–90.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2006.08.013
van Gemert WG, van Wersch MM, Greve JW, et al. Revisional surgery after failed vertical banded gastroplasty: restoration of vertical banded gastroplasty or conversion to gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 1998;8:21–8.
doi: 10.1381/096089298765555006
Mason EE. Vertical banded gastroplasty for obesity. Arch Surg. 1982;117(5):701–6.
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1982.01380290147026
Eckhout GV, Willbanks OL, Moore JT. Vertical ring gastroplasty for morbid obesity. Five year experience with 1,463 patients. Am J Surg. 1986;152(6):713–6.
doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90455-1
Paran H, Shargian L, Shwartz I, et al. Long-term follow-up on the effect of silastic ring vertical gastroplasty on weight and co-morbidities. Obes Surg. 2007;17:737–41.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9136-9
Elazary R, Hazzan D, Appelbaum L, et al. Feasibility of sleeve gastrectomy as a revision operation for failed silastic ring vertical gastroplasty. Obes Surg. 2009;19(5):645–9.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9714-5
Creange C et al. Gastric band conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass shows greater weight loss than conversion to sleeve gastrectomy: 5-year outcomes. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 14.10(2018):1531–6.
Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012;22(12):1827–34.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0726-9
Iannelli A, Amato D, Addeo P, et al. Laparoscopic conversion of vertical banded gastroplasty (Mason MacLean) into Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2008;18(1):43–6.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9255-3
David MB, Abu-Gazala S, Sadot E, et al. Laparoscopic conversion of failed vertical banded gastroplasty to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or biliopancreatic diversion. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(5):1085–91.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.01.026
Lessing Y, Pencovich N, Khatib M, et al. One-anastomosis gastric bypass: first 407 patients in 1 year. Obes Surg. 2017;27(10):2583–9.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2668-8
David MB, Abu-Gazala S, Sadot E, et al. Laparoscopic conversion of failed vertical banded gastroplasty to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or biliopancreatic diversion. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(5):1085–91.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.01.026
Gagné DJ, Dovec E, Urbandt JE. Laparoscopic revision of vertical banded gastroplasty to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: outcomes of 105 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(4):493–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.10.014
Zorrilla-Nunez LF, Campbell A, Giambartolomei G, et al. The importance of the biliopancreatic limb length in gastric bypass: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(1):43–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.10.013
Almalki OM, Lee W-J, Chen J-C, et al. Revisional gastric bypass for failed restrictive procedures: comparison of single-anastomosis (mini-) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2018;28:970–5.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2991-0