Outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair among patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
/ diagnostic imaging
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
/ diagnosis
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation
/ adverse effects
Comorbidity
Databases, Factual
Elective Surgical Procedures
Endovascular Procedures
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Male
Ontario
Postoperative Complications
/ mortality
Progression-Free Survival
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Abdominal aortic aneurysm
Observational study
Propensity score
Rheumatoid arthritis
Journal
Journal of vascular surgery
ISSN: 1097-6809
Titre abrégé: J Vasc Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8407742
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
received:
12
02
2020
accepted:
15
08
2020
pubmed:
21
9
2020
medline:
12
10
2021
entrez:
20
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In the present study, we compared the outcomes of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in patients with and without rheumatoid arthritis (RA) stratified by the type of surgery. A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted from 2003 to 2016. Linked administrative health data from Ontario, Canada were used to identify all patients aged ≥65 years who had undergone elective open or endovascular AAA repair during the study period. Patients were identified using validated procedure and billing codes and matching using propensity scores. The primary outcome was survival. The secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)-free survival (defined as freedom from death, myocardial infarction, and stroke), reintervention, and secondary rupture. Of 14,816 patients undergoing elective AAA repair, a diagnosis of RA was present for 309 (2.0%). The propensity-matched cohort included 234 pairs of RA and control patients. The matched cohort was followed up for a mean ± standard deviation of 4.93 ± 3.35 years, and the median survival was 6.76 and 7.31 years for the RA and control groups, respectively. Cox regression analysis demonstrated no statistically significant differences in the hazards for death, MACE, reintervention, or secondary rupture. Analysis of the differences in outcomes stratified by repair approach also showed no statistically significant differences in the hazards for death, MACE, reintervention, or secondary rupture. We found no statistically significant differences in survival, MACE, reintervention, or secondary rupture among patients with RA undergoing elective AAA repair compared with controls. Further studies are required to evaluate the impact of comorbidities and antirheumatic medications on the outcomes of elective AAA repair.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32950628
pii: S0741-5214(20)32059-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.134
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1261-1268.e5Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.