Impact on dose distribution and volume changes of a bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid spacer during chemo-proton therapy for a pediatric Ewing sarcoma.
Absorbable Implants
Chemoradiotherapy
/ methods
Child
Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
Humans
Male
Organs at Risk
Phantoms, Imaging
Polyglycolic Acid
/ chemistry
Proton Therapy
Radiometry
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Relative Biological Effectiveness
Sarcoma, Ewing
/ radiotherapy
Time Factors
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
chemo-proton therapy
pediatric cancer
polyglycolic acid (PGA) spacer
volume changes
Journal
Journal of radiation research
ISSN: 1349-9157
Titre abrégé: J Radiat Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0376611
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Nov 2020
16 Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
22
06
2020
revised:
19
08
2020
accepted:
24
08
2020
pubmed:
23
9
2020
medline:
28
9
2021
entrez:
22
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The clinical utility of a recently developed bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid (PGA) spacer has not yet been established in pediatric patients; therefore, we aimed to investigate its utility during chemo-proton therapy for pediatric cancer. Proton depth-dose curves were obtained in a water phantom with or without the spacer. Computed tomography (CT) scans were performed for the PGA spacer immersed in saline for 2 weeks to measure CT numbers and estimate the relative stopping power (RSP) for the proton beams. The spacer was placed in a patient with sacral Ewing sarcoma receiving 55.8 Gy [relative biological effectiveness (RBE)] in 31 fractions and was evaluated using CT scans performed every other week. In addition, the images were used to quantitatively evaluate changes in volume and RSP of the spacer and dose distributions in normal tissues. The spacer immersed in saline had a CT number of 91 ± 7 (mean ± standard deviation) Hounsfield units, and the corresponding RSP was predicted to be 1.07 ± 0.01. The measured RSP agreed with the predicted one. The volumes of the large bowel and rectum receiving ≥45 Gy(RBE) (V45Gy) were significantly reduced by placing the spacer; V45Gy without and with the spacer were 48.5 and 0.01%, respectively, for the rectum and 7.2 and 0%, respectively, for the large bowel. The volume of the spacer and RSP decreased at rates of 4.6 and 0.44% per week, respectively, whereas the target dose coverage was maintained until the end of treatment. The PGA spacer was considered effective for pediatric cancer patients undergoing chemo-proton therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32960269
pii: 5909783
doi: 10.1093/jrr/rraa087
pmc: PMC7674708
doi:
Substances chimiques
Polyglycolic Acid
26009-03-0
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
952-958Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.
Références
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Mar;19(3):707-15
pubmed: 20200431
J Radiat Res. 2017 May 1;58(3):363-371
pubmed: 27789564
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019 May 15;4(4):729-737
pubmed: 31673666
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Feb 22;12(1):40
pubmed: 28228150
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Dec 1;90(5):1177-85
pubmed: 25539373
N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 12;355(15):1572-82
pubmed: 17035650
J Radiat Res. 2016 Sep;57(5):524-532
pubmed: 27380800
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Jul 1;19(13):3163-72
pubmed: 11432882
Cancer Med. 2018 May;7(5):1870-1874
pubmed: 29605967
J Clin Oncol. 2009 May 10;27(14):2356-62
pubmed: 19255307
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Aug;120(2):214-222
pubmed: 31075183
Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5
pubmed: 22930834
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 1;95(1):95-102
pubmed: 27084632
J Radiat Res. 2019 Oct 23;60(5):612-621
pubmed: 31147697
Cancer Sci. 2017 Mar;108(3):444-447
pubmed: 28004469
Phys Med Biol. 1996 Jan;41(1):111-24
pubmed: 8685250
Cancer Med. 2016 Jul;5(7):1519-25
pubmed: 27165972
J Surg Oncol. 2010 Jan 1;101(1):97-9
pubmed: 19798696
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2016 Sep;39(3):645-54
pubmed: 27271800
JAMA. 2007 Jun 27;297(24):2705-15
pubmed: 17595271
Phys Med Biol. 1998 Jun;43(6):1579-92
pubmed: 9651027
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Apr 14;16(14):1800-3
pubmed: 20380016