Complement C3 vs C5 inhibition in severe COVID-19: Early clinical findings reveal differential biological efficacy.
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ therapeutic use
Betacoronavirus
/ pathogenicity
Biomarkers
/ blood
C-Reactive Protein
/ metabolism
COVID-19
Cohort Studies
Complement Activation
/ drug effects
Complement C3
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Complement C5
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Complement Inactivating Agents
/ therapeutic use
Coronavirus Infections
/ complications
Extracellular Traps
/ drug effects
Female
Gene Expression
Humans
Immunologic Factors
/ therapeutic use
Interleukin-6
/ metabolism
Male
Middle Aged
Neutrophils
/ drug effects
Pandemics
Peptides, Cyclic
/ therapeutic use
Pneumonia, Viral
/ complications
Respiratory Distress Syndrome
/ complications
SARS-CoV-2
Severity of Illness Index
AMY-101
Biomarkers
C3 inhibition
C5 blockade
COVID-19
Drug efficacy
Eculizumab
Thromboinflammation
Journal
Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.)
ISSN: 1521-7035
Titre abrégé: Clin Immunol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100883537
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2020
11 2020
Historique:
received:
05
09
2020
revised:
16
09
2020
accepted:
16
09
2020
pubmed:
23
9
2020
medline:
29
10
2020
entrez:
22
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Growing clinical evidence has implicated complement as a pivotal driver of COVID-19 immunopathology. Deregulated complement activation may fuel cytokine-driven hyper-inflammation, thrombotic microangiopathy and NET-driven immunothrombosis, thereby leading to multi-organ failure. Complement therapeutics have gained traction as candidate drugs for countering the detrimental consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Whether blockade of terminal complement effectors (C5, C5a, or C5aR1) may elicit similar outcomes to upstream intervention at the level of C3 remains debated. Here we compare the efficacy of the C5-targeting monoclonal antibody eculizumab with that of the compstatin-based C3-targeted drug candidate AMY-101 in small independent cohorts of severe COVID-19 patients. Our exploratory study indicates that therapeutic complement inhibition abrogates COVID-19 hyper-inflammation. Both C3 and C5 inhibitors elicit a robust anti-inflammatory response, reflected by a steep decline in C-reactive protein and IL-6 levels, marked lung function improvement, and resolution of SARS-CoV-2-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). C3 inhibition afforded broader therapeutic control in COVID-19 patients by attenuating both C3a and sC5b-9 generation and preventing FB consumption. This broader inhibitory profile was associated with a more robust decline of neutrophil counts, attenuated neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) release, faster serum LDH decline, and more prominent lymphocyte recovery. These early clinical results offer important insights into the differential mechanistic basis and underlying biology of C3 and C5 inhibition in COVID-19 and point to a broader pathogenic involvement of C3-mediated pathways in thromboinflammation. They also support the evaluation of these complement-targeting agents as COVID-19 therapeutics in large prospective trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32961333
pii: S1521-6616(20)30758-0
doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108598
pmc: PMC7501834
mid: NIHMS1630767
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Biomarkers
0
C3 protein, human
0
Complement C3
0
Complement C5
0
Complement Inactivating Agents
0
IL6 protein, human
0
Immunologic Factors
0
Interleukin-6
0
Peptides, Cyclic
0
compstatin
0
C-Reactive Protein
9007-41-4
eculizumab
A3ULP0F556
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
108598Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : P01 AI068730
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest JDL is the founder of Amyndas Pharmaceuticals which develops complement inhibitors for therapeutic purposes, and inventor of patents that describe the therapeutic use of complement inhibitors, some of which are developed by Amyndas. JDL is also the inventor of the compstatin technology licensed to Apellis Pharmaceuticals (i.e., 4(1MeW)7 W/POT-4/APL-1 and PEGylated derivatives such as APL-2/pegcetacoplan and APL-9). JDL has received consulting fees from Achillion, Baxter, LipimetiX, Ra Pharma, Sanofi, and Viropharma. A.M.R. has received research support from Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Alnylam and Ra Pharma and lecture fees from Alexion, Novartis, Pfizer and Apellis, and served as member of advisory–investigator boards for Alexion, Roche, Achillion, Novartis, Apellis and Samsung, and as a consultant for Amyndas. B.N. is a shareholder and consultant in Tikomed and iCoat Medica. M.H.-L. holds a patent on compositions of matter and methods for the diagnosis and treatment of sepsis by C5a inhibitory strategies licensed to InflaRx. R.T.C. acted as a speaker for Alexion Pharma Brazil. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239-1242
pubmed: 32091533
Clin Immunol. 2020 Jun;215:108450
pubmed: 32360516
Clin Immunol. 2020 Aug;217:108490
pubmed: 32492478
Lancet Haematol. 2020 Sep;7(9):e671-e678
pubmed: 32659214
Int J Clin Lab Res. 1998;28(2):110-5
pubmed: 9689553
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019 Sep;18(9):707-729
pubmed: 31324874
Diabetes. 1999 Oct;48(10):1907-14
pubmed: 10512353
Transl Res. 2020 Jun;220:1-13
pubmed: 32299776
Clin Immunol. 2020 Oct;219:108555
pubmed: 32771488
Nat Med. 2009 Jun;15(6):623-5
pubmed: 19448636
J Immunol. 2011 Jul 1;187(1):172-80
pubmed: 21642543
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 25;384(8):693-704
pubmed: 32678530
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Jul;146(1):215-217
pubmed: 32417135
Clin Immunol. 2020 Sep;218:108518
pubmed: 32599278
Haematologica. 2020 Jul 23;105(12):2847-2850
pubmed: 33256385
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Apr;24(7):4040-4047
pubmed: 32329881
Nat Med. 2020 Oct;26(10):1609-1615
pubmed: 32747830
JCI Insight. 2020 Aug 6;5(15):
pubmed: 32554923
Cell Res. 2020 Sep;30(9):814-816
pubmed: 32759967
Am J Hematol. 2018 Aug;93(4):564-577
pubmed: 29314145
Br J Haematol. 2020 Jun;189(6):e227-e230
pubmed: 32369610
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 9;383(2):120-128
pubmed: 32437596
Nat Rev Immunol. 2020 Jun;20(6):343-344
pubmed: 32327719
mBio. 2018 Oct 9;9(5):
pubmed: 30301856
Nat Rev Immunol. 2020 Sep;20(9):529-536
pubmed: 32728222
Blood. 2020 Jun 4;135(23):2033-2040
pubmed: 32339221
J Clin Invest. 2020 Nov 2;130(11):5674-5676
pubmed: 32925166
Clin Immunol. 2020 Oct;219:108544
pubmed: 32707089
Oncoimmunology. 2017 Jun 8;6(9):e1326442
pubmed: 28932632
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2007 May;14(5):549-55
pubmed: 17344343
J Clin Invest. 2020 Nov 2;130(11):6151-6157
pubmed: 32759504
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020 Oct;16(10):581-589
pubmed: 32733003
Cell Mol Immunol. 2019 Jan;16(1):19-27
pubmed: 29572545
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2021 Aug 1;321(2):L485-L489
pubmed: 34231390
Clin Immunol. 2020 Jun;215:108448
pubmed: 32353634
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Jun 05;11:857
pubmed: 32581810
Nature. 2020 Dec;588(7836):146-150
pubmed: 32726800
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506
pubmed: 31986264
JCI Insight. 2020 Jun 4;5(11):
pubmed: 32329756
Nat Med. 2020 Jul;26(7):1017-1032
pubmed: 32651579
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2017 Jan 15;1041-1042:19-26
pubmed: 27992787
Cell. 2020 May 28;181(5):1036-1045.e9
pubmed: 32416070
Circulation. 2020 Jun 2;141(22):1739-1741
pubmed: 32271624
Circulation. 2018 Oct 16;138(16):1720-1735
pubmed: 29802205
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 9;10(1):4320
pubmed: 32152402
Clin Immunol. 2020 Aug;217:108509
pubmed: 32535188