Factors associated with outcomes after a second CD19-targeted CAR T-cell infusion for refractory B-cell malignancies.
Adult
Aged
Antigens, CD19
/ metabolism
Cell Proliferation
Cyclophosphamide
/ therapeutic use
Cytokine Release Syndrome
/ complications
Female
Humans
Immunotherapy, Adoptive
Leukemia, B-Cell
/ immunology
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell
/ immunology
Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin
/ immunology
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
/ immunology
Progression-Free Survival
T-Lymphocytes
/ immunology
Treatment Outcome
Vidarabine
/ analogs & derivatives
Journal
Blood
ISSN: 1528-0020
Titre abrégé: Blood
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603509
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 01 2021
21 01 2021
Historique:
received:
01
05
2020
accepted:
09
09
2020
pubmed:
24
9
2020
medline:
13
5
2021
entrez:
23
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor-engineered (CD19 CAR) T-cell therapy has shown significant efficacy for relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell malignancies. Yet, CD19 CAR T cells fail to induce durable responses in most patients. Second infusions of CD19 CAR T cells (CART2) have been considered as a possible approach to improve outcomes. We analyzed data from 44 patients with R/R B-cell malignancies (acute lymphoblastic leukemia [ALL], n = 14; chronic lymphocytic leukemia [CLL], n = 9; non-Hodgkin lymphoma [NHL], n = 21) who received CART2 on a phase 1/2 trial (NCT01865617) at our institution. Despite a CART2 dose increase in 82% of patients, we observed a low incidence of severe toxicity after CART2 (grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome, 9%; grade ≥3 neurotoxicity, 11%). After CART2, complete response (CR) was achieved in 22% of CLL, 19% of NHL, and 21% of ALL patients. The median durations of response after CART2 in CLL, NHL, and ALL patients were 33, 6, and 4 months, respectively. Addition of fludarabine to cyclophosphamide-based lymphodepletion before the first CAR T-cell infusion (CART1) and an increase in the CART2 dose compared with CART1 were independently associated with higher overall response rates and longer progression-free survival after CART2. We observed durable CAR T-cell persistence after CART2 in patients who received cyclophosphamide and fludarabine (Cy-Flu) lymphodepletion before CART1 and a higher CART2 compared with CART1 cell dose. The identification of 2 modifiable pretreatment factors independently associated with better outcomes after CART2 suggests strategies to improve in vivo CAR T-cell kinetics and responses after repeat CAR T-cell infusions, and has implications for the design of trials of novel CAR T-cell products after failure of prior CAR T-cell immunotherapies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32967009
pii: S0006-4971(21)00084-7
doi: 10.1182/blood.2020006770
pmc: PMC7819764
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antigens, CD19
0
Cyclophosphamide
8N3DW7272P
Vidarabine
FA2DM6879K
fludarabine
P2K93U8740
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01865617']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase I
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
323-335Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA015704
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2021 by The American Society of Hematology.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 1;378(5):439-448
pubmed: 29385370
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Sep 10;35(26):3010-3020
pubmed: 28715249
Control Clin Trials. 1996 Aug;17(4):343-6
pubmed: 8889347
Blood. 2018 Jun 21;131(25):2745-2760
pubmed: 29540348
Blood. 2017 Nov 23;130(21):2295-2306
pubmed: 28924019
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Sep 7;8(355):355ra116
pubmed: 27605551
Sci Transl Med. 2015 Sep 2;7(303):303ra139
pubmed: 26333935
Blood. 2006 Mar 15;107(6):2294-302
pubmed: 16282341
Am J Hematol. 2019 Aug;94(8):E209-E213
pubmed: 31056762
J Immunol. 2018 Sep 15;201(6):1799-1809
pubmed: 30082322
Blood. 2011 Jan 6;117(1):72-82
pubmed: 20889925
JCI Insight. 2019 Apr 2;5:
pubmed: 30938714
N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 25;365(8):725-33
pubmed: 21830940
Blood. 2016 Sep 15;128(11):1533
pubmed: 31265503
Blood. 2019 Apr 25;133(17):1876-1887
pubmed: 30782611
Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1956:35-60
pubmed: 30779029
Blood. 2019 Aug 15;134(7):636-640
pubmed: 31648294
Blood. 2019 Apr 11;133(15):1652-1663
pubmed: 30728140
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010 Sep;16(9):1245-56
pubmed: 20304086
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):3059-68
pubmed: 25113753
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):31-42
pubmed: 30518502
Blood. 2015 Jun 25;125(26):4017-23
pubmed: 25999455
Leukemia. 2016 Apr;30(4):929-36
pubmed: 26639181
Nat Med. 1995 Dec;1(12):1268-73
pubmed: 7489407
J Clin Invest. 2016 Jun 1;126(6):2123-38
pubmed: 27111235
Blood. 1994 Dec 1;84(11):3948-55
pubmed: 7524753
Blood. 2020 May 7;135(19):1650-1660
pubmed: 32076701
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 May 1;17(5):414-423
pubmed: 31085755
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 28;377(26):2545-2554
pubmed: 29226764
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 3;380(1):45-56
pubmed: 30501490
Nat Med. 1996 Feb;2(2):216-23
pubmed: 8574968
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 28;377(26):2531-2544
pubmed: 29226797
Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Oct 15;12(20 Pt 1):6106-15
pubmed: 17062687
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 1;378(5):449-459
pubmed: 29385376