Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events: multi-database retrospective cohort study.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Canada
Cardiovascular Diseases
/ epidemiology
Databases, Factual
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
/ complications
Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Female
Humans
Incidence
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
United Kingdom
Young Adult
Journal
BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
ISSN: 1756-1833
Titre abrégé: BMJ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8900488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 09 2020
23 09 2020
Historique:
entrez:
24
9
2020
pubmed:
25
9
2020
medline:
2
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To compare the risk of cardiovascular events between sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors among people with type 2 diabetes in a real world context of clinical practice. Multi-database retrospective cohort study using a prevalent new user design with subsequent meta-analysis. Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies (CNODES), with administrative healthcare databases from seven Canadian provinces and the United Kingdom, 2013-18. 209 867 new users of a SGLT2 inhibitor matched to 209 867 users of a DPP-4 inhibitor on time conditional propensity score and followed for a mean of 0.9 years. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, a composite of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, or cardiovascular death). Secondary outcomes were the individual components of MACE, heart failure, and all cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate site specific adjusted hazards ratios and 95% confidence intervals, comparing use of SGLT2 inhibitors with use of DPP-4 inhibitors in an as treated approach. Site specific results were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. Compared with DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with decreased risks of MACE (incidence rate per 1000 person years: 11.4 In this large observational study conducted in a real world clinical practice context, the short term use of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with a decreased risk of cardiovascular events compared with the use of DPP-4 inhibitors. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03939624.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32967856
doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3342
pmc: PMC8009082
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors
0
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03939624']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
m3342Investigateurs
Samy Suissa
(S)
Colin R Dormuth
(CR)
Brenda R Hemmelgarn
(BR)
Jacqueline Quail
(J)
Dan Chateau
(D)
J Michael Paterson
(JM)
Jacques LeLorier
(J)
Adrian R Levy
(AR)
Pierre Ernst
(P)
Kristian B Filion
(KB)
Lisa M Lix
(LM)
Robert W Platt
(RW)
Ingrid S Sketris
(IS)
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: SA-S received research grants from Pfizer and Merck for projects not involving SGLT2 inhibitors or DPP-4 inhibitors. SS has attended advisory meetings or received speaking fees from Atara, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Merck, and Pfizer; SS is on the scientific advisory board of the EMPRISE study of SGLT2 inhibitors conducted by Harvard University and funded by Boehringer-Ingelheim; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Références
BMJ. 2019 Aug 29;366:l4772
pubmed: 31467044
Open Med. 2012 Oct 30;6(4):e134-40
pubmed: 23687528
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2117-28
pubmed: 26378978
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Oct;85(10):2378-2389
pubmed: 31276600
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jan 28;168(2):136-40
pubmed: 18227358
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Dec 15;124 Suppl 1:S12-S19
pubmed: 31741435
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Apr;26(4):459-468
pubmed: 27610604
JAMA. 2019 Jan 1;321(1):69-79
pubmed: 30418475
BMJ. 2010 Mar 12;340:b5087
pubmed: 20228141
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 16;373(3):232-42
pubmed: 26052984
Diabetes Care. 2016 May;39(5):735-7
pubmed: 27208376
Diabetes Care. 2012 Dec;35(12):2665-73
pubmed: 23173135
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 3;369(14):1327-35
pubmed: 23992602
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 24;380(4):347-357
pubmed: 30415602
Circulation. 2017 Jul 18;136(3):249-259
pubmed: 28522450
CMAJ. 2010 Nov 9;182(16):1749-53
pubmed: 20547712
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006 May;15(5):291-303
pubmed: 16447304
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Sep 24;18(1):120
pubmed: 31551068
Circulation. 2018 Apr 3;137(14):1432-1434
pubmed: 29610125
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(1):6-10
pubmed: 29263192
BMJ. 2018 Feb 6;360:k119
pubmed: 29437648
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):644-657
pubmed: 28605608
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 3;369(14):1317-26
pubmed: 23992601
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;44(3):827-36
pubmed: 26050254
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 May;20(5):1102-1110
pubmed: 29322605
Cardiol Rev. 2018 Nov/Dec;26(6):312-320
pubmed: 29608505
Circulation. 2018 Apr 3;137(14):1450-1459
pubmed: 29133607
BMJ. 2018 Nov 14;363:k4365
pubmed: 30429124
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2015 Dec;2(4):221-228
pubmed: 26954351
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Jan;21(1):28-36
pubmed: 30039524
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jun 5;71(22):2497-2506
pubmed: 29852973
Circulation. 2019 Jun 18;139(25):2822-2830
pubmed: 30955357
Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2017 Apr;27(3):194-202
pubmed: 28291655