Value of dynamic clinical and biomarker data for mortality risk prediction in COVID-19: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Area Under Curve
Betacoronavirus
Bilirubin
/ blood
Biomarkers
/ blood
C-Reactive Protein
/ metabolism
COVID-19
Cohort Studies
Coronavirus Infections
/ blood
Creatinine
/ blood
Female
Hospitalization
Humans
Leukocyte Count
Lymphocyte Count
Male
Middle Aged
Neutrophils
Pandemics
Pneumonia, Viral
/ blood
Prognosis
ROC Curve
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
SARS-CoV-2
United Kingdom
Urea
/ blood
intensive & critical care
respiratory infections
statistics & research methods
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 09 2020
23 09 2020
Historique:
entrez:
24
9
2020
pubmed:
25
9
2020
medline:
6
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Being able to predict which patients with COVID-19 are going to deteriorate is important to help identify patients for clinical and research practice. Clinical prediction models play a critical role in this process, but current models are of limited value because they are typically restricted to baseline predictors and do not always use contemporary statistical methods. We sought to explore the benefits of incorporating dynamic changes in routinely measured biomarkers, non-linear effects and applying 'state-of-the-art' statistical methods in the development of a prognostic model to predict death in hospitalised patients with COVID-19. The data were analysed from admissions with COVID-19 to three hospital sites. Exploratory data analysis included a graphical approach to partial correlations. Dynamic biomarkers were considered up to 5 days following admission rather than depending solely on baseline or single time-point data. Marked departures from linear effects of covariates were identified by employing smoothing splines within a generalised additive modelling framework. 3 secondary and tertiary level centres in Greater Manchester, the UK. 392 hospitalised patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19. 392 patients with a COVID-19 diagnosis were identified. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve increased from 0.73 using admission data alone to 0.75 when also considering results of baseline blood samples and to 0.83 when considering dynamic values of routinely collected markers. There was clear non-linearity in the association of age with patient outcome. This study shows that clinical prediction models to predict death in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 can be improved by taking into account both non-linear effects in covariates such as age and dynamic changes in values of biomarkers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32967887
pii: bmjopen-2020-041983
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041983
pmc: PMC7513423
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Urea
8W8T17847W
C-Reactive Protein
9007-41-4
Creatinine
AYI8EX34EU
Bilirubin
RFM9X3LJ49
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e041983Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/T016515/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: Swedish Orphan Biovitrum have provided investigational medicinal product for public-funded, peer-reviewed trials on which AK, AV, JG, HCP and SH are coinvestigators. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Biostatistics. 2014 Oct;15(4):706-18
pubmed: 24831103
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2049-2055
pubmed: 32202722
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062
pubmed: 32171076
Biostatistics. 2008 Jul;9(3):432-41
pubmed: 18079126
Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):846-848
pubmed: 32125452
Kidney Int. 2020 May;97(5):829-838
pubmed: 32247631
BMJ. 2020 Apr 7;369:m1328
pubmed: 32265220
Kidney Int. 2020 Jul;98(1):219-227
pubmed: 32327202
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506
pubmed: 31986264
Stat Med. 2012 Jan 30;31(2):143-54
pubmed: 22081439
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Jul;146(1):89-100
pubmed: 32407836
Lancet Rheumatol. 2020 Jul;2(7):e379-e381
pubmed: 32835233
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2011 Mar;20(1):40-9
pubmed: 21499542
Int J Med Sci. 2020 May 18;17(9):1281-1292
pubmed: 32547323