Comparison of visual performance between monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses of the same material and basic design.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 09 2020
23 09 2020
Historique:
received:
24
01
2020
accepted:
02
09
2020
entrez:
24
9
2020
pubmed:
25
9
2020
medline:
29
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To compare the visual performance of a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) (ZCB00) and a multifocal IOL (ZMB00) of the same material and basic design, we evaluated postoperative parameters at 10 weeks after the last surgery in cataract patients who underwent bilateral ZCB00 or ZMB00 implantation from December 13, 2010, to July 29, 2019, with the right and left lenses implanted within 3 months of each other. The study enrolled 2,230 eyes of 1,115 patients. The monofocal group comprised 904 eyes of 452 patients (72.3 ± 6.8 years; females/males, 268/184), and the multifocal group comprised 1,326 eyes of 663 patients (67.0 ± 7.8 years; females/males, 518/145). Contrast sensitivity (4.0/2.5/1.6/1.0/0.7 degrees), contrast sensitivity with glare (1.6/1.0/0.7 degrees), and the VFQ-25 score for driving at night were significantly better in the monofocal group (p < 0.00068, Wald test). Uncorrected intermediate/near visual acuity and near spectacle independence were significantly better in the multifocal group (p < 0.00068, Wald test). The two IOL groups had different characteristics in terms of contrast sensitivity, night-time driving, uncorrected intermediate/near visual acuity and near spectacle independence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32968124
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72473-x
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-72473-x
pmc: PMC7511318
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
15490Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Pepose, J. S. et al. Visual performance of patients with bilateral vs combination crystalens, ReZoom, and ReSTOR intraocular lens implants. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 144, 347–357 (2007).
pubmed: 17651679
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.05.036
Mester, U., Hunold, W., Wesendahl, T. & Kaymak, H. Functional outcomes after implantation of Tecnis ZM900 and Array SA40 multifocal intraocular lenses. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 33, 1033–1040 (2007).
pubmed: 17531699
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.02.037
Alio, J. L. et al. Near vision restoration with refractive lens exchange and pseudoaccommodating and multifocal refractive and diffractive intraocular lenses: Comparative clinical study. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 30, 2494–2503 (2004).
pubmed: 15617915
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.04.052
Alio, J. L., Elkady, B., Ortiz, D. & Bernabeu, G. Clinical outcomes and intraocular optical quality of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens with asymmetrical light distribution. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 34, 942–948 (2008).
pubmed: 18498999
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.11.057
Zelichowska, B., Rekas, M., Stankiewicz, A., Cervino, A. & Montes-Mico, R. Apodized diffractive versus refractive multifocal intraocular lenses: Optical and visual evaluation. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 34, 2036–2042 (2008).
pubmed: 19027556
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.06.045
Alfonso, J. F., Fernandez-Vega, L., Baamonde, M. B. & Montes-Mico, R. Prospective visual evaluation of apodized diffractive intraocular lenses. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 33, 1235–1243 (2007).
pubmed: 17586380
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.034
Kohnen, T. et al. European multicenter study of the AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 113, 584 (2006).
pubmed: 16483658
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.11.020
Weghaupt, H., Pieh, S. & Skorpik, C. Visual properties of the foldable array multifocal intraocular lens. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 22, 1313–1317 (1996).
pubmed: 9051523
doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80091-5
Leyland, M. & Zinicola, E. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: A systematic review. Ophthalmology 110, 1789–1798 (2003).
pubmed: 13129879
doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00722-X
Woodward, M. A., Randleman, J. B. & Stulting, R. D. Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 35, 992–997 (2009).
pubmed: 19465282
pmcid: 5125020
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.031
Montes-Mico, R. & Alio, J. L. Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 29, 703–711 (2003).
pubmed: 12686237
doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01648-6
Pieh, S. et al. Halo size under distance and near conditions in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 85, 816–821 (2001).
pubmed: 11423456
pmcid: 1724058
doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.7.816
Steinert, R. F., Aker, B. L., Trentacost, D. J., Smith, P. J. & Tarantino, N. A prospective comparative study of the AMO ARRAY zonal-progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 106, 1243–1255 (1999).
pubmed: 10406601
doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00704-6
Sato, M. et al. JSCRS clinical survey. IOL&RS 33, 453–473 (2019).
Khandelwal, S. S., Jun, J. J., Mak, S., Booth, M. S. & Shekelle, P. G. Effectiveness of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract surgery and lens replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 257, 863–875 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-04218-6
Packer, M., Fine, I. H., Hoffman, R. S. & Piers, P. A. Improved functional vision with a modified prolate intraocular lens. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 30, 986–992 (2004).
pubmed: 15130633
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.10.022
Bellucci, R. et al. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity comparison between Tecnis and AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses: A multicenter randomized study. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 31, 712–717 (2005).
pubmed: 15899447
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.08.049
Denoyer, A., Le Lez, M. L., Majzoub, S. & Pisella, P. J. Quality of vision after cataract surgery after Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens implantation: Effect of contrast sensitivity and wavefront aberration improvements on the quality of daily vision. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 33, 210–216 (2007).
pubmed: 17276260
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.10.035
Yamauchi, T. et al. Comparison of visual performance of multifocal intraocular lenses with same material monofocal intraocular lenses. PLoS ONE 8, e68236 (2013).
pubmed: 23840836
pmcid: 3695892
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068236
Cillino, S. et al. One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 115, 1508–1516 (2008).
pubmed: 18538402
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.017
Alio, J. L. et al. Quality of life evaluation after implantation of 2 multifocal intraocular lens models and a monofocal model. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 37, 638–648 (2011).
pubmed: 21420587
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.056
Hutz, W. W., Eckhardt, H. B., Rohrig, B. & Grolmus, R. Reading ability with 3 multifocal intraocular lens models. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 32, 2015–2021 (2006).
pubmed: 17137977
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.08.029
Pieh, S. et al. Quantitative performance of bifocal and multifocal intraocular lenses in a model eye: Point spread function in multifocal intraocular lenses. Arch. Ophthalmol. 120, 23–28 (2002).
pubmed: 11786053
doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.1.23
Montes-Mico, R., Espana, E., Bueno, I., Charman, W. N. & Menezo, J. L. Visual performance with multifocal intraocular lenses: Mesopic contrast sensitivity under distance and near conditions. Ophthalmology 111, 85–96 (2004).
pubmed: 14711718
doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00862-5
Sen, H. N., Sarikkola, A. U., Uusitalo, R. J. & Laatikainen, L. Quality of vision after AMO array multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 30, 2483–2493 (2004).
pubmed: 15617914
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.04.049
Richter-Mueksch, S., Weghaupt, H., Skorpik, C., Velikay-Parel, M. & Radner, W. Reading performance with a refractive multifocal and a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 28, 1957–1963 (2002).
pubmed: 12457669
doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01488-8
Brydon, K. W., Tokarewicz, A. C. & Nichols, B. D. AMO array multifocal lens versus monofocal correction in cataract surgery. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 26, 96–100 (2000).
pubmed: 10646154
doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(99)00335-1
Featherstone, K. A. et al. Driving simulation study: Bilateral array multifocal versus bilateral AMO monofocal intraocular lenses. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 25, 1254–1262 (1999).
pubmed: 10476511
doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(99)00145-5
Javitt, J. C. & Steinert, R. F. Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: A multinational clinical trial evaluating clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes. Ophthalmology 107, 2040–2048 (2000).
pubmed: 11054329
doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00368-7
Javitt, J. et al. Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: Clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes. Multicenter clinical trial in Germany and Austria. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 26, 1356–1366 (2000).
pubmed: 11020621
doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00636-2
Pearce, J. L. Multifocal intraocular lenses. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 8, 2–5 (1997).
doi: 10.1097/00055735-199702000-00002
pubmed: 10168268
Steinert, R. F. Visual outcomes with multifocal intraocular lenses. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 11, 12–21 (2000).
pubmed: 10724823
doi: 10.1097/00055735-200002000-00004
Alpern, M., Mason, G. L. & Jardinico, R. E. Vergence and accommodation. V. Pupil size changes associated with changes in accommodative vergence. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 52, 762–767 (1961).
pubmed: 13860699
doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(61)90900-X
Packer, M., Fine, I. H. & Hoffman, R. S. Wavefront technology in cataract surgery. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 15, 56–60 (2004).
pubmed: 14743021
doi: 10.1097/00055735-200402000-00011
Bellucci, R. & Morselli, S. Optimizing higher-order aberrations with intraocular lens technology. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 18, 67–73 (2007).
pubmed: 17159451
doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3280121af1
Denoyer, A., Halfon, J., Majzoub, S. & Pisella, P. J. Quels bénéfices visuels peut-on attendre d’un implant sans aberration sphérique dans la chirurgie de la cataracte?. J. Fr. Ophtalmol. 30, 578–584 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/S0181-5512(07)89661-6
pubmed: 17646746
Rocha, K. M. et al. Wavefront analysis and contrast sensitivity of aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses: A randomized prospective study. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 142, 750–756 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.06.031
pubmed: 17056359
Munoz, G., Albarran-Diego, C., Montes-Mico, R., Rodriguez-Galietero, A. & Alio, J. L. Spherical aberration and contrast sensitivity after cataract surgery with the Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 32, 1320–1327 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.02.055
pubmed: 16863968
Dick, H. B. Recent developments in aspheric intraocular lenses. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 20, 25–32 (2009).
pubmed: 19077826
doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32831b8bb3
Pesudovs, K. Takagi glare tester CGT-1000 for contrast sensitivity and glare testing in normal individuals and cataract patients. J. Refract. Surg. 23, 492–498 (2007).
pubmed: 17523512
doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20070501-13
Palmer, A. M. et al. Visual function with bilateral implantation of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses: A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J. Refract. Surg. 24, 257–264 (2008).
doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20080301-07
Packer, M. et al. Evaluation of the aspheric Tecnis multifocal intraocular lens: one-year results from the first cohort of the food and drug administration clinical trial. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 149, 577-584.e1 (2010).
pubmed: 20138609
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.10.022
Takahashi, Y. Contrast glare tester. IOL & RS 15, 192–199 (2001).
Goes, F. J. Visual results following implantation of a refractive multifocal IOL in one eye and a diffractive multifocal IOL in the contralateral eye. J. Refract. Surg. 24, 300–305 (2008).
pubmed: 18416266
doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20080301-13
Mangione, C. M. et al. Identifying the content area for the 51-item national eye institute visual function questionnaire: Results from focus groups with visually impaired persons. Arch. Ophthalmol. 116, 227–233 (1998).
pubmed: 9488276
Mangione, C. M. et al. Development of the 25-item national eye institute visual function questionnaire. Arch. Ophthalmol. 119, 1050–1058 (2001).
pubmed: 11448327
doi: 10.1001/archopht.119.7.1050
Gomi, F. et al. Vision-related quality of life in Japanese patients with wet age-related macular degeneration treated with intravitreal aflibercept in a real-world setting. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 63, 437–447 (2019).
pubmed: 31673841
doi: 10.1007/s10384-019-00687-2
Jelin, E., Wisløff, T., Jørstad, ØK., Heiberg, T. & Moe, M. C. Patient-reported outcome measures in the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A 1-year prospective study. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 4, e000353 (2019).
pubmed: 31673632
pmcid: 6797267
doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000353
Hyman, L. G., Komaroff, E., Heijl, A., Bengtsson, B. & Leske, M. C. Treatment and vision-related quality of life in the early manifest glaucoma trial. Ophthalmology 112, 1505–1513 (2005).
pubmed: 16019074
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.03.028
Riva, I. et al. Vision-related quality of life and symptom perception change over time in newly-diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma patients. Sci. Rep. 9, 6735 (2019).
pubmed: 31043703
pmcid: 6494828
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43203-9
Rulli, E. et al. Visual field loss and vision-related quality of life in the Italian primary open angle glaucoma study. Sci. Rep. 8, 619 (2018).
pubmed: 29330448
pmcid: 5766542
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-19113-z
Bradley, E. A. et al. Evaluation of the national eye institute visual function questionnaire in graves’ ophthalmopathy. Ophthalmology 113, 1450–1454 (2006).
pubmed: 16769116
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.02.060
De Carneros-Llorente, A. M., De Carneros, A. M., De Carneros-Llorente, P. M. & Jimenez-Alfaro, I. Comparison of visual quality and subjective outcomes among 3 trifocal intraocular lenses and 1 bifocal intraocular lens. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 45, 587–594 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.005
Agnifili, L. et al. The ocular surface after successful glaucoma filtration surgery: A clinical, in vivo confocal microscopy, and immune-cytology study. Sci. Rep. 9, 11299 (2019).
pubmed: 31383900
pmcid: 6683151
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47823-z
De Nie, K. F., Crama, N., Tilanus, M. A., Klevering, B. J. & Boon, C. J. Pars plana vitrectomy for disturbing primary vitreous floaters: Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 251, 1373–1382 (2013).
doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-2205-3
Varma, R., Haller, J. A. & Kaiser, P. K. Improvement in patient-reported visual function after ocriplasmin for vitreomacular adhesion: Results of the microplasmin for intravitreous injection-traction release without surgical treatment (MIVI-TRUST) trials. JAMA Ophthalmol. 133, 997–1004 (2015).
pubmed: 26068086
doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.1746
Hirneiss, C. et al. Visual quality of life after macular hole surgery: Outcome and predictive factors. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 91, 481–484 (2007).
pubmed: 17077117
doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.102376
Suzukamo, Y. et al. Psychometric properties of the 25-item national eye institute visual function questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), Japanese version. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 3, 65 (2005).
pubmed: 16248900
pmcid: 1283746
doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-65
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).