Long-chain polyunsaturated omega-3 fatty acids reduce multiple myeloma exosome-mediated suppression of NK cell cytotoxicity.
Cell Line, Tumor
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Docosahexaenoic Acids
/ pharmacology
Eicosapentaenoic Acid
/ pharmacology
Exosomes
/ drug effects
Humans
Interferon-gamma
/ metabolism
K562 Cells
Killer Cells, Natural
/ cytology
Multiple Myeloma
/ drug therapy
NK Cell Lectin-Like Receptor Subfamily K
/ metabolism
Cancer
Exosome
Extracellular vesicle
Natural killer cell
Omega-3
Tumor
Journal
Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
ISSN: 2008-2231
Titre abrégé: Daru
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101125969
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
30
04
2020
accepted:
11
09
2020
pubmed:
26
9
2020
medline:
28
8
2021
entrez:
25
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite the advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), complete remission is usually challenging. The interactions between tumor and host cells, in which exosomes (EXs) play critical roles, have been shown to be among the major deteriorative tumor-promoting factors herein. Therefore, any endeavor to beneficially target these EX-mediated interactions could be of high importance. a) To investigate the effects of myeloma EXs on natural killer (NK) cell functions. b) To check whether treatment of myeloma cells with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) or docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), two polyunsaturated omega-3 fatty acids with known anti-cancer effects, can modify myeloma EXs in terms of their effects on natural killer functions. L363 cells were treated with either EPA or DHA or left untreated and the released EXs (designated as E-EX, D-EX and C-EX, respectively) were used to treat NK cells for functional studies. Myeloma EXs (C-EXs) significantly reduced NK cytotoxicity against K562 cells (P ≤ 0.05), while the cytotoxicity suppression was significantly lower (P ≤ 0.05) in the (E-EX)- and (D-EX)-treated NK cells compared to the (C-EX)-treated cells. The expression of the activating NK receptor NKG2D and NK degranulation, after treatment with the EXs, were both altered following the same pattern. However, C-EXs could increase IFN-γ production in NK cells (P < 0.01), which was not significantly affected by EPA/DHA treatment. This indicates a dual effect of myeloma EXs on NK cells functions. Our observations showed that myeloma EXs have both suppressive and stimulatory effects on different NK functions. Treatment of myeloma cells with EPA/DHA can reduce the suppressive effects of myeloma EXs while maintaining their stimulatory effects. These findings, together with the previous findings on the anti-cancer effects of EPA/DHA, provide stronger evidence for the repositioning of the currently existing EPA/DHA supplements to be used in the treatment of MM as an adjuvant treatment. EXs released from L363 (myeloma) cells in their steady state increase IFN-γ production of NK cells, while reduce their cytotoxicity against the K562 cell line (right blue trace). EXs from L363 cells pre-treated with either EPA or DHA are weaker stimulators of IFN-γ production. These EXs also increase NK cytotoxicity and NKG2D expression (left brown trace) compared to the EXs obtained from untreated L363 cells. Based on these findings, myeloma EXs have both suppressive and stimulatory effects on different NK functions depending on the properties of their cells of origin, which can be exploited in the treatment of myeloma.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Despite the advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), complete remission is usually challenging. The interactions between tumor and host cells, in which exosomes (EXs) play critical roles, have been shown to be among the major deteriorative tumor-promoting factors herein. Therefore, any endeavor to beneficially target these EX-mediated interactions could be of high importance.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
a) To investigate the effects of myeloma EXs on natural killer (NK) cell functions. b) To check whether treatment of myeloma cells with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) or docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), two polyunsaturated omega-3 fatty acids with known anti-cancer effects, can modify myeloma EXs in terms of their effects on natural killer functions.
METHODS
METHODS
L363 cells were treated with either EPA or DHA or left untreated and the released EXs (designated as E-EX, D-EX and C-EX, respectively) were used to treat NK cells for functional studies.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Myeloma EXs (C-EXs) significantly reduced NK cytotoxicity against K562 cells (P ≤ 0.05), while the cytotoxicity suppression was significantly lower (P ≤ 0.05) in the (E-EX)- and (D-EX)-treated NK cells compared to the (C-EX)-treated cells. The expression of the activating NK receptor NKG2D and NK degranulation, after treatment with the EXs, were both altered following the same pattern. However, C-EXs could increase IFN-γ production in NK cells (P < 0.01), which was not significantly affected by EPA/DHA treatment. This indicates a dual effect of myeloma EXs on NK cells functions.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our observations showed that myeloma EXs have both suppressive and stimulatory effects on different NK functions. Treatment of myeloma cells with EPA/DHA can reduce the suppressive effects of myeloma EXs while maintaining their stimulatory effects. These findings, together with the previous findings on the anti-cancer effects of EPA/DHA, provide stronger evidence for the repositioning of the currently existing EPA/DHA supplements to be used in the treatment of MM as an adjuvant treatment. EXs released from L363 (myeloma) cells in their steady state increase IFN-γ production of NK cells, while reduce their cytotoxicity against the K562 cell line (right blue trace). EXs from L363 cells pre-treated with either EPA or DHA are weaker stimulators of IFN-γ production. These EXs also increase NK cytotoxicity and NKG2D expression (left brown trace) compared to the EXs obtained from untreated L363 cells. Based on these findings, myeloma EXs have both suppressive and stimulatory effects on different NK functions depending on the properties of their cells of origin, which can be exploited in the treatment of myeloma.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32974883
doi: 10.1007/s40199-020-00372-7
pii: 10.1007/s40199-020-00372-7
pmc: PMC7704888
doi:
Substances chimiques
IFNG protein, human
0
KLRK1 protein, human
0
NK Cell Lectin-Like Receptor Subfamily K
0
Docosahexaenoic Acids
25167-62-8
Interferon-gamma
82115-62-6
Eicosapentaenoic Acid
AAN7QOV9EA
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
647-659Subventions
Organisme : National Institute for Medical Research Development
ID : 977582
Références
Nat Methods. 2019 Apr;16(4):286
pubmed: 30923391
Oncotarget. 2015 May 30;6(15):13772-89
pubmed: 25944696
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2018 May;12(3):411-415
pubmed: 29588138
Nature. 2015 Nov 19;527(7578):329-35
pubmed: 26524530
J Extracell Vesicles. 2015 May 14;4:27066
pubmed: 25979354
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2016;16(3):277-84
pubmed: 26671731
Traffic. 2011 Dec;12(12):1659-68
pubmed: 21645191
Blood. 2014 Dec 11;124(25):3748-57
pubmed: 25320245
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Mar;37(3):259-266
pubmed: 30742126
PLoS One. 2010 Jul 22;5(7):e11469
pubmed: 20661468
Trends Biotechnol. 2019 Nov;37(11):1236-1254
pubmed: 31104858
Curr Protoc Immunol. 2013;Chapter 14:Unit 14.32.
pubmed: 23392637
Nat Rev Immunol. 2002 Aug;2(8):569-79
pubmed: 12154376
J Biol Chem. 2001 Oct 5;276(40):37335-40
pubmed: 11489905
Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2013;35(2):119-25
pubmed: 23741190
Science. 2018 Mar 30;359(6383):1537-1542
pubmed: 29599246
J Nutr Biochem. 2014 Dec;25(12):1254-62
pubmed: 25277647
J Nutr. 2003 Jun;133(6):1913-20
pubmed: 12771339
Nat Med. 2001 Mar;7(3):297-303
pubmed: 11231627
J Surg Res. 2002 Sep;107(1):145-53
pubmed: 12384078
Cells. 2019 Feb 12;8(2):
pubmed: 30759880
Blood Rev. 2019 Nov;38:100595
pubmed: 31445775
J Immunol. 1988 Jun 15;140(12):4397-402
pubmed: 3131433
Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 29;5:15724
pubmed: 26511855
Int J Cancer. 2005 Nov 10;117(3):340-8
pubmed: 15900589
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2017 Jun;15(3):162-170
pubmed: 28432594
Oncoimmunology. 2017 Jan 13;6(3):e1279372
pubmed: 28405503
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 11;7(1):11075
pubmed: 28894091
Cancer Lett. 2016 Jul 10;377(1):17-24
pubmed: 27102001
Immunity. 2019 Mar 19;50(3):547-549
pubmed: 30893584
Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2006 Apr;Chapter 3:Unit 3.22
pubmed: 18228490
J Immunother Cancer. 2017 Aug 15;5(1):65
pubmed: 28806909
Oncotarget. 2016 May 24;7(21):30876-91
pubmed: 27129167
Pharmacol Res. 2018 Aug;134:246-256
pubmed: 29990623
Exp Cell Res. 2018 Feb 1;363(1):114-120
pubmed: 29277503
Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1884:119-130
pubmed: 30465198
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2011 May;7(3):367-82
pubmed: 21595603
Mol Cancer. 2017 Oct 13;16(1):159
pubmed: 29029605
Oncotarget. 2014 Jul 30;5(14):5686-99
pubmed: 25015330
Mol Cancer. 2015 Jul 16;14:133
pubmed: 26178901
Bioconjug Chem. 2019 Apr 17;30(4):994-1005
pubmed: 30855944
Leukemia. 2017 Jun;31(6):1259-1268
pubmed: 28321122
Daru. 2019 Dec;27(2):879-884
pubmed: 31435903
J Pathol. 2016 Jun;239(2):162-73
pubmed: 26956697
Oncotarget. 2018 Feb 5;9(14):11858-11875
pubmed: 29545942
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009 May;52(5):571-4
pubmed: 19090549
Clin Nutr. 2020 Jul;39(7):2137-2143
pubmed: 31558292
Nat Cell Biol. 2019 Jan;21(1):9-17
pubmed: 30602770
FEBS J. 2014 May;281(9):2214-27
pubmed: 24605801
Tumour Biol. 2016 Apr;37(4):5455-66
pubmed: 26563374
Ann Hematol. 2010 Aug;89(8):775-82
pubmed: 20127484
Haematologica. 2018 Oct;103(10):e469-e472
pubmed: 29700168
Leukemia. 2012 Oct;26(10):2286-96
pubmed: 22460757
J Nutr. 2012 Mar;142(3):592S-599S
pubmed: 22279140
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015 Sep;1851(9):1123-33
pubmed: 25900100
Future Oncol. 2014 Mar;10(4):671-81
pubmed: 24754596
Oncotarget. 2016 Sep 13;7(37):60698-60711
pubmed: 27474171
Cell Mol Immunol. 2011 Jan;8(1):23-30
pubmed: 21200381