Targeting increased levels of APP in Down syndrome: Posiphen-mediated reductions in APP and its products reverse endosomal phenotypes in the Ts65Dn mouse model.
Alzheimer Disease
/ physiopathology
Amyloid beta-Peptides
/ metabolism
Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor
/ genetics
Animals
Cholinesterase Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Disease Models, Animal
Down Syndrome
/ genetics
Endosomes
/ metabolism
Humans
Mice
Neurons
/ metabolism
Phenotype
Phosphorylation
Physostigmine
/ administration & dosage
APP
Alzheimer's disease
Down syndrome
Posiphen
Ts65Dn mouse
early endosome
neurotrophin signaling
Journal
Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association
ISSN: 1552-5279
Titre abrégé: Alzheimers Dement
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101231978
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2021
02 2021
Historique:
received:
01
04
2020
accepted:
07
08
2020
pubmed:
26
9
2020
medline:
16
11
2021
entrez:
25
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recent clinical trials targeting amyloid beta (Aβ) and tau in Alzheimer's disease (AD) have yet to demonstrate efficacy. Reviewing the hypotheses for AD pathogenesis and defining possible links between them may enhance insights into both upstream initiating events and downstream mechanisms, thereby promoting discovery of novel treatments. Evidence that in Down syndrome (DS), a population markedly predisposed to develop early onset AD, increased APP gene dose is necessary for both AD neuropathology and dementia points to normalization of the levels of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) and its products as a route to further define AD pathogenesis and discovering novel treatments. AD and DS share several characteristic manifestations. DS is caused by trisomy of whole or part of chromosome 21; this chromosome contains about 233 protein-coding genes, including APP. Recent evidence points to a defining role for increased expression of the gene for APP and for its 99 amino acid C-terminal fragment (C99, also known as β-CTF) in dysregulating the endosomal/lysosomal system. The latter is critical for normal cellular function and in neurons for transmitting neurotrophic signals. We hypothesize that the increase in APP gene dose in DS initiates a process in which increased levels of full-length APP (fl-APP) and its products, including β-CTF and possibly Aβ peptides (Aβ42 and Aβ40), drive AD pathogenesis through an endosome-dependent mechanism(s), which compromises transport of neurotrophic signals. To test this hypothesis, we carried out studies in the Ts65Dn mouse model of DS and examined the effects of Posiphen, an orally available small molecule shown in prior studies to reduce fl-APP. In vitro, Posiphen lowered fl-APP and its C-terminal fragments, reversed Rab5 hyperactivation and early endosome enlargement, and restored retrograde transport of neurotrophin signaling. In vivo, Posiphen treatment (50 mg/kg/d, 26 days, intraperitoneal [i.p.]) of Ts65Dn mice was well tolerated and demonstrated no adverse effects in behavior. Treatment resulted in normalization of the levels of fl-APP, C-terminal fragments and small reductions in Aβ species, restoration to normal levels of Rab5 activity, reduced phosphorylated tau (p-tau), and reversed deficits in TrkB (tropomyosin receptor kinase B) activation and in the Akt (protein kinase B [PKB]), ERK (extracellular signal-regulated kinase), and CREB (cAMP response element-binding protein) signaling pathways. Remarkably, Posiphen treatment also restored the level of choline acetyltransferase protein to 2N levels. These findings support the APP gene dose hypothesis, point to the need for additional studies to explore the mechanisms by which increased APP gene expression acts to increase the risk for AD in DS, and to possible utility of treatments to normalize the levels of APP and its products for preventing AD in those with DS. Important unanswered questions are: (1) When should one intervene in those with DS; (2) would an APP-based strategy have untoward consequences on possible adaptive changes induced by chronically increased APP gene dose; (3) do other genes present on chromosome 21, or on other chromosomes whose expression is dysregulated in DS, contribute to AD pathogenesis; and (4) can one model strategies that combine the use of an APP-based treatment with those directed at other AD phenotypes including p-tau and inflammation. The APP gene dose hypothesis interfaces with the amyloid cascade hypothesis of AD as well as with the genetic and cell biological observations that support it. Moreover, upregulation of fl-APP protein and products may drive downstream events that dysregulate tau homeostasis and inflammatory responses that contribute to propagation of AD pathogenesis.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVE
Recent clinical trials targeting amyloid beta (Aβ) and tau in Alzheimer's disease (AD) have yet to demonstrate efficacy. Reviewing the hypotheses for AD pathogenesis and defining possible links between them may enhance insights into both upstream initiating events and downstream mechanisms, thereby promoting discovery of novel treatments. Evidence that in Down syndrome (DS), a population markedly predisposed to develop early onset AD, increased APP gene dose is necessary for both AD neuropathology and dementia points to normalization of the levels of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) and its products as a route to further define AD pathogenesis and discovering novel treatments.
BACKGROUND
AD and DS share several characteristic manifestations. DS is caused by trisomy of whole or part of chromosome 21; this chromosome contains about 233 protein-coding genes, including APP. Recent evidence points to a defining role for increased expression of the gene for APP and for its 99 amino acid C-terminal fragment (C99, also known as β-CTF) in dysregulating the endosomal/lysosomal system. The latter is critical for normal cellular function and in neurons for transmitting neurotrophic signals.
NEW/UPDATED HYPOTHESIS
We hypothesize that the increase in APP gene dose in DS initiates a process in which increased levels of full-length APP (fl-APP) and its products, including β-CTF and possibly Aβ peptides (Aβ42 and Aβ40), drive AD pathogenesis through an endosome-dependent mechanism(s), which compromises transport of neurotrophic signals. To test this hypothesis, we carried out studies in the Ts65Dn mouse model of DS and examined the effects of Posiphen, an orally available small molecule shown in prior studies to reduce fl-APP. In vitro, Posiphen lowered fl-APP and its C-terminal fragments, reversed Rab5 hyperactivation and early endosome enlargement, and restored retrograde transport of neurotrophin signaling. In vivo, Posiphen treatment (50 mg/kg/d, 26 days, intraperitoneal [i.p.]) of Ts65Dn mice was well tolerated and demonstrated no adverse effects in behavior. Treatment resulted in normalization of the levels of fl-APP, C-terminal fragments and small reductions in Aβ species, restoration to normal levels of Rab5 activity, reduced phosphorylated tau (p-tau), and reversed deficits in TrkB (tropomyosin receptor kinase B) activation and in the Akt (protein kinase B [PKB]), ERK (extracellular signal-regulated kinase), and CREB (cAMP response element-binding protein) signaling pathways. Remarkably, Posiphen treatment also restored the level of choline acetyltransferase protein to 2N levels. These findings support the APP gene dose hypothesis, point to the need for additional studies to explore the mechanisms by which increased APP gene expression acts to increase the risk for AD in DS, and to possible utility of treatments to normalize the levels of APP and its products for preventing AD in those with DS.
MAJOR CHALLENGES FOR THE HYPOTHESIS
Important unanswered questions are: (1) When should one intervene in those with DS; (2) would an APP-based strategy have untoward consequences on possible adaptive changes induced by chronically increased APP gene dose; (3) do other genes present on chromosome 21, or on other chromosomes whose expression is dysregulated in DS, contribute to AD pathogenesis; and (4) can one model strategies that combine the use of an APP-based treatment with those directed at other AD phenotypes including p-tau and inflammation.
LINKAGE TO OTHER MAJOR THEORIES
The APP gene dose hypothesis interfaces with the amyloid cascade hypothesis of AD as well as with the genetic and cell biological observations that support it. Moreover, upregulation of fl-APP protein and products may drive downstream events that dysregulate tau homeostasis and inflammatory responses that contribute to propagation of AD pathogenesis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32975365
doi: 10.1002/alz.12185
pmc: PMC7984396
doi:
Substances chimiques
APP protein, mouse
0
Amyloid beta-Peptides
0
Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor
0
Cholinesterase Inhibitors
0
Physostigmine
9U1VM840SP
phenserine
SUE285UG3S
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
271-292Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.
Références
Peptides. 2000 Dec;21(12):1769-75
pubmed: 11150636
Trends Biotechnol. 2020 May;38(5):497-518
pubmed: 31980301
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Mar 17;11:239
pubmed: 32256352
Small GTPases. 2018 Mar 4;9(1-2):5-21
pubmed: 28055292
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015 Sep;16(9):564-74
pubmed: 26243569
Curr Med Chem. 2018;25(26):3141-3159
pubmed: 30191777
J Biol Chem. 2007 Nov 30;282(48):34850-7
pubmed: 17906291
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1990;360:263-80
pubmed: 2147289
Am J Pathol. 2000 Jul;157(1):277-86
pubmed: 10880397
Cell Stem Cell. 2019 Jun 6;24(6):908-926.e8
pubmed: 31130512
JAMA Neurol. 2015 Aug;72(8):912-9
pubmed: 26121081
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2005 Jul;2(3):281-90
pubmed: 15974893
Genet Med. 2009 Sep;11(9):611-6
pubmed: 19636252
Neuron. 2010 Sep 9;67(5):769-80
pubmed: 20826309
Free Radic Biol Med. 2018 Jan;114:40-51
pubmed: 28988799
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Aug;18(8):1183-9
pubmed: 26192747
J Biol Chem. 2002 Nov 22;277(47):45518-28
pubmed: 12198135
Eur J Med Chem. 2018 Mar 25;148:436-452
pubmed: 29477076
Cell Rep. 2016 Oct 11;17(3):759-773
pubmed: 27732852
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 26;107(4):1630-5
pubmed: 20080541
Ann Neurol. 1998 Mar;43(3):380-3
pubmed: 9506555
Genes Brain Behav. 2008 Oct;7(7):810-20
pubmed: 19125866
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Sep 20;113(38):E5655-64
pubmed: 27601642
J Neurochem. 1995 Aug;65(2):710-24
pubmed: 7616227
Ann Neurol. 1996 Nov;40(5):799-801
pubmed: 8957023
Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Jun 23;6:136
pubmed: 25002847
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 9;104(2):403-9
pubmed: 17197420
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Aug;132(2):235-256
pubmed: 26993139
Redox Biol. 2019 May;23:101162
pubmed: 30876754
Nat Cell Biol. 2008 Feb;10(2):149-59
pubmed: 18193038
Parkinsons Dis. 2012;2012:142372
pubmed: 22693681
EMBO Mol Med. 2016 Jun 01;8(6):595-608
pubmed: 27025652
Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2007;13(3):207-14
pubmed: 17910089
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 04;9(12):e114521
pubmed: 25474204
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018 Sep 06;4:575-590
pubmed: 30406177
J Formos Med Assoc. 2016 Feb;115(2):67-75
pubmed: 26337232
Neuron. 2019 Oct 23;104(2):256-270.e5
pubmed: 31416668
Mol Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 10;:
pubmed: 32647257
Front Neurosci. 2019 Jun 21;13:659
pubmed: 31293377
Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 15;83(4):311-319
pubmed: 28967385
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012 May 15;64(7):629-39
pubmed: 22202501
Nat Rev Neurol. 2019 Apr;15(4):191-192
pubmed: 30833695
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018 May 03;4:195-214
pubmed: 29955663
Nature. 2014 Nov 13;515(7526):274-8
pubmed: 25307057
Nat Protoc. 2014 Oct;9(10):2329-40
pubmed: 25188634
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;60(4):1533-1545
pubmed: 29081415
Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;167:321-336
pubmed: 31753140
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;64(s1):S567-S610
pubmed: 29843241
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2011 Jan 06;3(1):1
pubmed: 21211070
J Clin Invest. 2016 May 2;126(5):1815-33
pubmed: 27064279
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2014 Dec;116:162-71
pubmed: 25463650
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jul 21;106(29):12031-6
pubmed: 19597142
Science. 2018 Nov 16;362(6416):
pubmed: 30309905
Cell. 1999 Oct 15;99(2):179-88
pubmed: 10535736
Am Fam Physician. 1999 Jan 15;59(2):381-90, 392, 395-6
pubmed: 9930130
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Oct;17(10):860-869
pubmed: 30172624
J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;27(4):701-9
pubmed: 21876249
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2017 Jul;362(1):31-44
pubmed: 28416568
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2016;13(9):952-63
pubmed: 26971934
Int J Mol Sci. 2009 Mar;10(3):1226-60
pubmed: 19399246
Brain. 2018 Jul 1;141(7):1917-1933
pubmed: 29850777
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Feb;17(2):271-292
pubmed: 32975365
Mol Biol Cell. 2013 Aug;24(16):2494-505
pubmed: 23783030
Sci Transl Med. 2009 Nov 18;1(7):7ra17
pubmed: 20368182
Science. 1993 Aug 13;261(5123):921-3
pubmed: 8346443
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Feb 25;20(4):
pubmed: 30823541
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54887
pubmed: 23382994
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 03;7:45561
pubmed: 28368015
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016 Jan;17(1):5-21
pubmed: 26631930
Exp Neurol. 2012 Jun;235(2):447-54
pubmed: 22119426
Neuroreport. 2011 Oct 26;22(15):767-72
pubmed: 21876463
Neurobiol Dis. 2011 Aug;43(2):397-413
pubmed: 21527343
Mamm Genome. 2016 Dec;27(11-12):538-555
pubmed: 27538963
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1992;379:123-42
pubmed: 1409740
Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Jan 1;77(1):43-51
pubmed: 24951455
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e36023
pubmed: 22558309
Neurobiol Dis. 2015 May;77:173-90
pubmed: 25753471
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jun;82(12):4245-9
pubmed: 3159021
J Neurosci. 1995 Apr;15(4):2888-905
pubmed: 7536822
Science. 2001 Aug 24;293(5534):1487-91
pubmed: 11520987
Prog Brain Res. 2004;146:3-23
pubmed: 14699953
FASEB J. 2017 Jul;31(7):2729-2743
pubmed: 28663518
J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;28(4):951-60
pubmed: 22179572
Curr Protoc Pharmacol. 2019 Mar;84(1):e57
pubmed: 30802363
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;56(2):459-470
pubmed: 27983553
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020 Feb 6;6(1):9
pubmed: 32029743
Nat Commun. 2015 Dec 14;6:10119
pubmed: 26658127
EMBO J. 2012 May 16;31(10):2261-74
pubmed: 22505025
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018 Jan 18;4:37-45
pubmed: 29955650
Science. 1982 Jul 30;217(4558):408-14
pubmed: 7046051
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Sep;1823(9):1468-83
pubmed: 22610083
Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2019 Sep;89(1):e81
pubmed: 31532917
Neurology. 1985 Jul;35(7):957-61
pubmed: 3159974
Brain. 2006 Nov;129(Pt 11):2977-83
pubmed: 16921174
Nat Protoc. 2006;1(3):1117-9
pubmed: 17406392
Mol Psychiatry. 2016 May;21(5):707-16
pubmed: 26194181
J Vis Exp. 2015 Feb 06;(96):e52434
pubmed: 25742564
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Aug;132(2):257-276
pubmed: 27138984
Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1992 Dec;16(3-4):239-45
pubmed: 1337933
Hum Mol Genet. 2012 Nov 1;21(21):4587-601
pubmed: 22843498
Front Pharmacol. 2014 Jul 28;5:176
pubmed: 25120486
Elife. 2020 Jun 29;9:
pubmed: 32597754
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2016;14(1):101-15
pubmed: 26813123
J Biol Chem. 2010 Oct 8;285(41):31217-32
pubmed: 20558735
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 31;10(7):e0134861
pubmed: 26230397
Nat Rev Neurol. 2019 Jul;15(7):365-366
pubmed: 31138932
Neurobiol Aging. 2004 Nov-Dec;25(10):1263-72
pubmed: 15465622
Nat Neurosci. 2014 May;17(5):661-3
pubmed: 24728269
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007 Jan;320(1):386-96
pubmed: 17003227
Neurobiol Dis. 2017 Jul;103:1-10
pubmed: 28342823
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1993;384:117-33
pubmed: 8115398
Nat Rev Neurol. 2019 Jul;15(7):419-427
pubmed: 31222062
J Neurosci. 2012 Jul 4;32(27):9217-27
pubmed: 22764230
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Apr;10(4):411-3
pubmed: 17322876
Nat Genet. 2006 Jan;38(1):24-6
pubmed: 16369530
Front Aging Neurosci. 2017 Apr 04;9:83
pubmed: 28420982
Neuron. 2008 Apr 10;58(1):42-51
pubmed: 18400162
Mol Neurodegener. 2017 Oct 23;12(1):75
pubmed: 29061112
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58752
pubmed: 23554921
Gene. 2003 Oct 30;318:137-47
pubmed: 14585506
Arch Neurol. 1995 Apr;52(4):373-8
pubmed: 7710373
Am J Neurodegener Dis. 2019 Feb 15;8(1):1-15
pubmed: 30906671
Lancet. 2016 Jul 30;388(10043):505-17
pubmed: 26921134
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;60(2):439-450
pubmed: 28946567
Neurobiol Aging. 2019 Aug;80:196-202
pubmed: 31207551
J Neurosci. 2009 Mar 18;29(11):3565-78
pubmed: 19295161
J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;40(4):1005-16
pubmed: 24577464
Ann Neurol. 2004 Nov;56(5):675-88
pubmed: 15468085
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2016 Apr;22(2 Dementia):419-34
pubmed: 27042902
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;83(9):894-902
pubmed: 22791904
Brain Res. 1994 Jul 4;650(1):20-31
pubmed: 7953673
Free Radic Biol Med. 2018 Jan;114:52-61
pubmed: 29031834
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Apr 11;19(4):
pubmed: 29641484
Hum Mol Genet. 2010 Jul 15;19(14):2780-91
pubmed: 20442137
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 04;9(9):e106572
pubmed: 25188425
Front Neurosci. 2019 May 07;13:446
pubmed: 31133787
Mol Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 15;:
pubmed: 31942037
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2011 Mar;118(3):493-507
pubmed: 21221670
Lancet Neurol. 2016 May;15(6):622-36
pubmed: 27302127
Neuron. 2003 Jul 31;39(3):409-21
pubmed: 12895417
Mol Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;24(3):345-363
pubmed: 30470799
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2016 Jun;2(2):69-81
pubmed: 28642933
J Neurosci. 2010 Jul 7;30(27):9166-71
pubmed: 20610750
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 Mar;14(3):177-87
pubmed: 23422909
Mol Biol Cell. 2015 Jan 15;26(2):205-17
pubmed: 25392299
Hum Mol Genet. 2000 Jul 1;9(11):1681-90
pubmed: 10861295
Neuron. 2006 Jul 6;51(1):29-42
pubmed: 16815330
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jul 24;104(30):12506-11
pubmed: 17640880
Nature. 2001 Dec 6;414(6864):643-8
pubmed: 11740561
Traffic. 2018 Nov;19(11):840-853
pubmed: 30120810