Sugammadex versus neostigmine for routine reversal of rocuronium block in adult patients: A cost analysis.
Adult
Cost analysis
Gamma-cyclodextrins
Neostigmine
Neuromuscular blocking agents
Sugammadex
Journal
Journal of clinical anesthesia
ISSN: 1873-4529
Titre abrégé: J Clin Anesth
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8812166
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
11
06
2020
revised:
30
07
2020
accepted:
15
08
2020
pubmed:
28
9
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
27
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This report analyzes the comparative costs, efficacy and side effects of a newer, more expensive reversal drug, sugammadex, with its generic counterpart, neostigmine combined with glycopyrrolate, or no reversal agent when used routinely to reverse rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in adult patients. Cost analysis. We constructed a decision model to analyze the costs associated with the choice of reversal drug and differences in reversal time, occurrence of postoperative nausea or vomiting (PONV), and residual blockade requiring unplanned postoperative mechanical ventilation (UPMV). We selected variables that demonstrated meaningful differences in meta-analyses of published studies and/or had significant associated costs. We used data from local hospital system information, meta-analysis of published studies, and the general literature to construct base-case scenarios and sensitivity analyses. We performed the analysis from the perspective of a single hospital system. Costs were in 2019 U.S. dollars. Cost analysis suggested that reversal with sugammadex is preferable to neostigmine or no reversal drug when operating room (OR) time was valued at ≥$8.60/min (base case $32.49/min). Net costs of sugammadex were less than no treatment or neostigmine reversal when the probability of UPMV exceeded 0.019 and 0.036, respectively. Neither sugammadex nor neostigmine reversal was preferable to no treatment in a base-case analysis that considered the effect of the reversal agent on only drug and PONV costs, disregarding costs of OR time or UPMV. Routine reversal with sugammadex is preferable to choosing neostigmine or no reversal drug when accounting for potential savings in OR time. Sugammadex might also be a reasonable choice for patients at high risk of UPMV. If the cost of OR time is not considered, the analysis does not support the routine use of sugammadex in patients with perceived increased risk or solely to reduce PONV.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32980763
pii: S0952-8180(20)31150-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110027
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cholinesterase Inhibitors
0
Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents
0
gamma-Cyclodextrins
0
Sugammadex
361LPM2T56
Neostigmine
3982TWQ96G
Rocuronium
WRE554RFEZ
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
110027Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.