3D Deep Neural Network Segmentation of Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Development and Validation for Clinical Trials.
Clinical trials
Deep neural networks
Intracerebral hemorrhage
Journal
Neuroinformatics
ISSN: 1559-0089
Titre abrégé: Neuroinformatics
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101142069
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2021
07 2021
Historique:
accepted:
18
09
2020
pubmed:
28
9
2020
medline:
20
8
2021
entrez:
27
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) occurs when a blood vessel ruptures in the brain. This leads to significant morbidity and mortality, the likelihood of which is predicated on the size of the bleeding event. X-ray computed tomography (CT) scans allow clinicians and researchers to qualitatively and quantitatively diagnose hemorrhagic stroke, guide interventions and determine inclusion criteria of patients in clinical trials. There is no currently available open source, validated tool to quickly segment hemorrhage. Using an automated pipeline and 2D and 3D deep neural networks, we show that we can quickly and accurately estimate ICH volume with high agreement with time-consuming manual segmentation. The training and validation datasets include significant heterogeneity in terms of pathology, such as the presence of intraventricular (IVH) or subdural hemorrhages (SDH) as well as variable image acquisition parameters. We show that deep neural networks trained with an appropriate anatomic context in the network receptive field, can effectively perform ICH segmentation, but those without enough context will overestimate hemorrhage along the skull and around calcifications in the ventricular system. We trained with all data from a multi-center phase II study (n = 112) achieving a best mean and median Dice coefficient of 0.914 and 0.919, a volume correlation of 0.979 and an average volume difference of 1.7 ml and root mean squared error of 4.7 ml in 500 out-of-sample scans from the corresponding multi-center phase III study. 3D networks with appropriate anatomic context outperformed both 2D and random forest models. Our results suggest that deep neural network models, when carefully developed can be incorporated into the workflow of an ICH clinical trial series to quickly and accurately segment ICH, estimate total hemorrhage volume and minimize segmentation failures. The model, weights and scripts for deployment are located at https://github.com/msharrock/deepbleed . This is the first publicly available neural network model for segmentation of ICH, the only model evaluated with the presence of both IVH and SDH and the only model validated in the workflow of a series of clinical trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32980970
doi: 10.1007/s12021-020-09493-5
pii: 10.1007/s12021-020-09493-5
pmc: PMC7997814
mid: NIHMS1632795
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
403-415Subventions
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : U01 NS080824
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : U24 TR001609
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS046309
Pays : United States
Références
Stroke. 1993 Jul;24(7):987-93
pubmed: 8322400
Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44
pubmed: 26017442
Lancet Neurol. 2008 May;7(5):391-9
pubmed: 18396107
Stroke. 2015 Nov;46(11):3270-3
pubmed: 26451031
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Sep;39(9):1609-1616
pubmed: 30049723
Crit Care Med. 1999 Mar;27(3):617-21
pubmed: 10199544
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2012 Sep;7(5):785-98
pubmed: 22293946
Stroke. 2009 Apr;40(4):1533-8
pubmed: 19246695
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2033-44
pubmed: 20851191
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Feb 15;14:379-390
pubmed: 28275541
Stroke. 2013 Mar;44(3):627-34
pubmed: 23391763
Lancet. 2019 Mar 9;393(10175):1021-1032
pubmed: 30739747
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2008;105:147-51
pubmed: 19066101
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Nov;15(12):1228-1237
pubmed: 27751554
Stroke. 2012 Jul;43(7):1961-3
pubmed: 22588267
Lancet. 2009 May 9;373(9675):1632-44
pubmed: 19427958
Neuroimage. 2015 Jul 1;114:379-85
pubmed: 25862260
N Engl J Med. 2005 Feb 24;352(8):777-85
pubmed: 15728810
J Neurol Sci. 2014 Oct 15;345(1-2):3-7
pubmed: 25034055
Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2388-2396
pubmed: 30318264
R J. 2015 Jun;7(1):163-175
pubmed: 27330830
Neuroimage Clin. 2014 Mar 21;4:540-8
pubmed: 24818079
Stroke. 2006 Feb;37(2):404-8
pubmed: 16373654
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1995 Apr;46(3):207-16
pubmed: 7656554
Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;61(4):957-65
pubmed: 22440645
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):3416-3423
pubmed: 31735138
Stroke. 2013 Jan;44(1):237-9
pubmed: 23233387
Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Nov;17(3):143-55
pubmed: 12391568
Stroke. 2015 Sep;46(9):2470-6
pubmed: 26243227
Med Image Anal. 2017 Jan;35:250-269
pubmed: 27475911
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):782-90
pubmed: 21979382
Stroke. 1996 Aug;27(8):1304-5
pubmed: 8711791
Eur J Neurol. 2017 Mar;24(3):468-474
pubmed: 28052454
Stroke. 2001 Apr;32(4):891-7
pubmed: 11283388
Stroke. 2012 Jan;43(1):67-71
pubmed: 21980211