Skin wound healing assisted by angiogenic targeted tissue engineering: A comprehensive review of bioengineered approaches.
Angiogenesis Inducing Agents
/ therapeutic use
Animals
Biocompatible Materials
/ therapeutic use
Humans
Neovascularization, Physiologic
/ drug effects
Regeneration
/ drug effects
Skin
/ blood supply
Skin Physiological Phenomena
/ drug effects
Tissue Engineering
/ methods
Wound Healing
/ drug effects
angiogenesis
biomaterials
chronic wound
skin tissue engineering
wound healing
Journal
Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A
ISSN: 1552-4965
Titre abrégé: J Biomed Mater Res A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101234237
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
received:
10
06
2020
revised:
23
09
2020
accepted:
26
09
2020
pubmed:
29
9
2020
medline:
30
12
2021
entrez:
28
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Skin injuries and in particular, chronic wounds, are one of the major prevalent medical problems, worldwide. Due to the pivotal role of angiogenesis in tissue regeneration, impaired angiogenesis can cause several complications during the wound healing process and skin regeneration. Therefore, induction or promotion of angiogenesis can be considered as a promising approach to accelerate wound healing. This article presents a comprehensive overview of current and emerging angiogenesis induction methods applied in several studies for skin regeneration, which are classified into the cell, growth factor, scaffold, and biological/chemical compound-based strategies. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of these angiogenic strategies along with related research examples are discussed in order to demonstrate their potential in the treatment of wounds.
Substances chimiques
Angiogenesis Inducing Agents
0
Biocompatible Materials
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
453-478Informations de copyright
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Borena BM, Martens A, Broeckx SY, et al. Regenerative skin wound healing in mammals: state-of-the-art on growth factor and stem cell based treatments. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;36:1-23. https://doi.org/10.1159/000374049.
Sen CK, Gordillo GM, Roy S, et al. Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17:763-771. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00543.x.
Whittam AJ, Maan ZN, Duscher D, et al. Challenges and opportunities in drug delivery for wound healing. Adv Wound Care. 2016;5:79-88. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2014.0600.
Boateng JS, Matthews KH, Stevens HNE, Eccleston GM. Wound healing dressings and drug delivery systems: a review. J Pharm Sci. 2008;97:2892-2923. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.21210.
Bowler PG. Wound pathophysiology, infection and therapeutic options. Ann Med. 2002;34:419-427.
Yildirimer L, Thanh NTK, Seifalian AM. Skin regeneration scaffolds: a multimodal bottom-up approach. Trends Biotechnol. 2012;30:638-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.08.004.
Laschke MW, Harder Y, Amon M, et al. Angiogenesis in tissue engineering: breathing life into constructed tissue substitutes. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:2093-2104. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.2093.
Auerbach R, Lewis R, Shinners B, Kubai L, Akhtar N. Angiogenesis assays: a critical overview. Clin Chem. 2003;49:32-40. https://doi.org/10.1373/49.1.32.
Carmeliet P. Angiogenesis in health and disease. Nat Med. 2003;9:653-660. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0603-653.
Nowak-Sliwinska P, Alitalo K, Allen E, et al. Consensus guidelines for the use and interpretation of angiogenesis assays. Angiogenesis. 2018;21:425-532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-018-9613-x.
Chung J, Shum-Tim D. Neovascularization in tissue engineering. Cell. 2012;1:1246-1260. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells1041246.
Gholipourmalekabadi M, Zhao S, Harrison BS, Mozafari M, Seifalian AM. Oxygen-generating biomaterials: a new, viable paradigm for tissue engineering? Trends Biotechnol. 2016;34:1010-1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.05.012.
Tahergorabi Z, Khazaei M. A review on angiogenesis and its assays. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2012;15:1110-1126.
Nsiah BA, Moore EM, Roudsari LC, Virdone NK, West JL. 8-Angiogenesis in hydrogel biomaterials. In: Poole-Warren L, Martens P, Green RBT-BP for MA, eds. Woodhead Publ. Ser. Biomater, UK: Woodhead Publishing; 2016:189-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-105-4.00008-0.
Martin P, Nunan R. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of repair in acute and chronic wound healing. Br J Dermatol. 2015;173:370-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.13954.
Pugh CW, Ratcliffe PJ. Regulation of angiogenesis by hypoxia: role of the HIF system. Nat Med. 2003;9:677-684. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0603-677.
Battiston KG, Cheung JWC, Jain D, Santerre JP. Biomaterials in co-culture systems: towards optimizing tissue integration and cell signaling within scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2014;35:4465-4476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.02.023.
Moeller BJ, Cao Y, Vujaskovic Z, Li CY, Haroon ZA, Dewhirst MW. The relationship between hypoxia and angiogenesis. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004;14:215-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semradonc.2004.04.005.
Duscher D, Maan ZN, Whittam AJ, et al. Fibroblast-specific deletion of hypoxia inducible factor-1 critically impairs murine cutaneous neovascularization and wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;136:1004-1013. https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000000256.Prenatal.
Okonkwo U, DiPietro L. Diabetes and wound angiogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18071419.
Renault M, Roncalli J, Tongers J, et al. Sonic hedgehog induces angiogenesis via rho kinase-dependent signaling in endothelial cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2011;49:490-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.05.003.Sonic.
Asai J, Takenaka H, Kusano KF, et al. Topical sonic hedgehog gene therapy accelerates wound healing in diabetes by enhancing endothelial progenitor cell-mediated microvascular remodeling. Circulation. 2006;113:2413-2424. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.603167.
Suh HN, Han HJ. Sonic hedgehog increases the skin wound-healing ability of mouse embryonic stem cells through the microRNA 200 family. Br J Pharmacol. 2015;172:815-828. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.12947.
Nour S, Baheiraei N, Imani R, et al. Bioactive materials: a comprehensive review on interactions with biological microenvironment based on the immune response. J Bionic Eng. 2019;16:563-581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-019-0046-z.
Lisovsky A, Zhang DKY, Sefton MV. Effect of methacrylic acid beads on the sonic hedgehog signaling pathway and macrophage polarization in a subcutaneous injection mouse model. Biomaterials. 2016;98:203-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.04.033.
Spiller KL, Anfang RR, Spiller KJ, et al. The role of macrophage phenotype in vascularization of tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2014;35:4477-4488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.02.012.
Kanaya K, Masaaki OT, Nakamura T, Horii-Komatsu M, Alev C, et al. Sonic hedgehog signaling regulates vascular differentiation and function in human CD34 positive cells: Vasculogenic CD34+ cells with sonic hedgehog. Stem Cell Res. 2015;14:165-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2015.01.003.
Gupta R, Mackie AR, Misener S, Liu L, Losordo DW, Kishore R. Endothelial smoothened-dependent hedgehog signaling is not required for sonic hedgehog induced angiogenesis or ischemic tissue repair. Lab Invest. 2018;98:682-691. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41374-018-0028-5.
Luo J-D, Hu T-P, Wang L, Chen M-S, Liu S-M, Chen AF. Sonic hedgehog improves delayed wound healing via enhancing cutaneous nitric oxide function in diabetes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2009;297:E525-E531. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00308.2009.
Larouche J, Sheoran S, Maruyama K, Martino MM. Immune regulation of skin wound healing: mechanisms and novel therapeutic targets. Adv Wound Care. 2018;7:209-231. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2017.0761.
Alvarez MM, Liu JC, Trujillo-de Santiago G, et al. Delivery strategies to control inflammatory response: modulating M1-M2 polarization in tissue engineering applications. J Control Release. 2016;240:349-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.01.026.
Dipietro LA. Angiogenesis and wound repair: when enough is enough. J Leukoc Biol. 2016;100:979-984. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.4MR0316-102R.
Wietecha MS, DiPietro LA. Therapeutic approaches to the regulation of wound angiogenesis. Adv Wound Care. 2013;2:81-86. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2011.0348.
Nour S, Baheiraei N, Imani R, et al. A review of accelerated wound healing approaches: biomaterial-assisted tissue remodeling. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2019;30(120):1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-019-6319-6.
Demidova-Rice TN, Hamblin MR, Herman IM. Acute and impaired wound healing: pathophysiology and current methods for drug delivery, part 1: normal and chronic wounds: biology, causes, and approaches to care. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2012;25:304-314. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000416006.55218.d0.
Han G, Ceilley R. Chronic wound healing: a review of current management and treatments. Adv Ther. 2017;34:599-610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-017-0478-y.
Li WW, Carter MJ, Mashiach E, Guthrie SD. Vascular assessment of wound healing: a clinical review. Int Wound J. 2017;14:460-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12622.
Turner NJ, Badylak SF. The use of biologic scaffolds in the treatment of chronic nonhealing wounds. Adv Wound Care. 2014;4:490-500. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2014.0604.
Wood F. Tissue engineering of skin. Princ Regen Med. 2011;36:1063-1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-381422-7.10057-4.
Darwin E, Tomic-Canic M. Healing chronic wounds: current challenges and potential solutions. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2018;7:296-302.
Sorg H, Tilkorn DJ, Hager S, Hauser J, Mirastschijski U. Skin wound healing: an update on the current knowledge and concepts. Eur Surg Res. 2017;58:81-94. https://doi.org/10.1159/000454919.
Devalliere J, Dooley K, Hu Y, Kelangi SS, Uygun BE, Yarmush ML. Co-delivery of a growth factor and a tissue-protective molecule using elastin biopolymers accelerates wound healing in diabetic mice. Biomaterials. 2017;141:149-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2017.06.043.
Veith AP, Henderson K, Spencer A, Sligar AD, Baker AB. Therapeutic strategies for enhancing angiogenesis in wound healing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;146:97-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2018.09.010.
Moura LIF, Dias AMA, Carvalho E, de Sousa HC. Recent advances on the development of wound dressings for diabetic foot ulcer treatment-a review. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:7093-7114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.03.033.
Boateng J, Catanzano O. Advanced therapeutic dressings for effective wound healing-a review. J Pharm Sci. 2015;104:3653-3680. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.24610.
Frueh FS, Menger MD, Lindenblatt N, Giovanoli P, Laschke MW. Current and emerging vascularization strategies in skin tissue engineering. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2017;37:613-625. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2016.1209157.
Ekaputra AK, Prestwich GD, Cool SM, Hutmacher DW. The three-dimensional vascularization of growth factor-releasing hybrid scaffold of poly (ɛ-caprolactone)/collagen fibers and hyaluronic acid hydrogel. Biomaterials. 2011;32:8108-8117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.022.
Hastings CL, Kelly HM, Murphy MJ, Barry FP, O'Brien FJ, Duffy GP. Development of a thermoresponsive chitosan gel combined with human mesenchymal stem cells and desferrioxamine as a multimodal pro-angiogenic therapeutic for the treatment of critical limb ischaemia. J Control Release. 2012;161:73-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.04.033.
Saberianpour S, Heidarzadeh M, Geranmayeh MH, Hosseinkhani H. Tissue engineering strategies for the induction of angiogenesis using. Biomaterials. 2018;4:1-15.
Kamel RA, Ong JF, Eriksson E, Junker JPE, Caterson EJ. Tissue engineering of skin. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:533-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.03.027.
Wang C, Wang Q, Gao W, et al. Highly efficient local delivery of endothelial progenitor cells significantly potentiates angiogenesis and full-thickness wound healing. Acta Biomater. 2018;69:156-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.01.019.
Kashpur O, Smith A, Imbriaco R, Greaves B, Gerami-naini B, Garlick JA. Cell Therapies: New Frontier for the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulceration. 2018). 4, Switzerland: Humana Press, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89869-8.
Novosel EC, Kleinhans C, Kluger PJ. Vascularization is the key challenge in tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011;63:300-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2011.03.004.
Lee DE, Ayoub N, Agrawal DK. Mesenchymal stem cells and cutaneous wound healing: novel methods to increase cell delivery and therapeutic efficacy. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016;7:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-016-0303-6.
Katoh M. Therapeutics targeting angiogenesis: genetics and epigenetics, extracellular miRNAs and signaling networks (review). Int J Mol Med. 2013;32:763-767. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2013.1444.
Mehrabani M, Najafi M, Kamarul T, et al. Deferoxamine preconditioning to restore impaired HIF-1α-mediated angiogenic mechanisms in adipose-derived stem cells from STZ-induced type 1 diabetic rats. Cell Prolif. 2015;48:532-549. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpr.12209.
Duscher D, Barrera J, Wong VW, et al. Stem cells in wound healing: the future of regenerative medicine? A mini-review. Gerontology. 2016;62:216-225. https://doi.org/10.1159/000381877.
Lin Y-C, Grahovac T, Oh SJ, Ieraci M, Rubin JP, Marra KG. Evaluation of a multi-layer adipose-derived stem cell sheet in a full-thickness wound healing model. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:5243-5250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.09.028.
Jiang Y, Chen B, Liu Y, et al. Effect of collagen scaffold with adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction cells on diabetic wound healing: a study in a diabetic porcine model. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2013;10:192-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-013-0001-8.
Davenport Huyer L, Pascual-Gil S, Wang Y, Mandla S, Yee B, Radisic M. Advanced strategies for modulation of the material-macrophage interface. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;1909331(1909331). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201909331.
Fetz AE, Radic MZ, Bowlin G. Neutrophils in biomaterial-guided tissue regeneration: matrix reprogramming for angiogenesis. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2020;1-32. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2020.0028.
Bloise N, Rountree I, Polucha C, et al. Engineering immunomodulatory biomaterials for regenerating the infarcted myocardium. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:292.
Yin Y, He X-T, Wang J, et al. Pore size-mediated macrophage M1-to-M2 transition influences new vessel formation within the compartment of a scaffold. Appl Mater Today. 2020;18:100466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2019.100466.
Minutti CM, Knipper JA, Allen JE, Zaiss DMW. Tissue-specific contribution of macrophages to wound healing. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2017;61:3-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.08.006.
Landén NX, Li D, Ståhle M. Transition from inflammation to proliferation: a critical step during wound healing. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73:3861-3885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-016-2268-0.
Clayton ZE, Tan RP, Miravet MM, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived endothelial cells promote angiogenesis and accelerate wound closure in a murine excisional wound healing model. Biosci Rep. 2018;38:BSR20180563. https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20180563.
Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126:663-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024.
King A, Balaji S, Keswani SG, Crombleholme TM. The role of stem cells in wound angiogenesis. Adv Wound Care. 2014;3:614-625. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2013.0497.
Lu D, Chen B, Liang Z, et al. Comparison of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells with bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells for treatment of diabetic critical limb ischemia and foot ulcer: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;92:26-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2010.12.010.
Xu S-M, Liang T. Clinical observation of the application of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for the treatment of diabetic foot gangrene. Exp Ther Med. 2016;11:283-288. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2888.
Kirana S, Stratmann B, Prante C, et al. Autologous stem cell therapy in the treatment of limb ischaemia induced chronic tissue ulcers of diabetic foot patients. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66:384-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02886.x.
Gadelkarim M, Abushouk AI, Ghanem E, Hamaad AM, Saad AM, Abdel-Daim MM. Adipose-derived stem cells: effectiveness and advances in delivery in diabetic wound healing. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;107:625-633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.08.013.
Kirby GTS, Mills SJ, Cowin AJ, Smith LE. Stem cells for cutaneous wound healing. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:285869. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/285869, 1, 11.
Clayton ZE, Yuen GSC, Sadeghipour S, et al. A comparison of the pro-angiogenic potential of human induced pluripotent stem cell derived endothelial cells and induced endothelial cells in a murine model of peripheral arterial disease. Int J Cardiol. 2017;234:81-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.01.125.
Tan RP, Chan AHP, Lennartsson K, et al. Integration of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived endothelial cells with polycaprolactone/gelatin-based electrospun scaffolds for enhanced therapeutic angiogenesis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9:70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-0824-2.
Kashpur O, Smith A, Gerami-Naini B, et al. Differentiation of diabetic foot ulcer-derived induced pluripotent stem cells reveals distinct cellular and tissue phenotypes. FASEB J Off Publ Fed Am Soc Exp Biol. 2019;33:1262-1277. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201801059.
Nakayama C, Fujita Y, Matsumura W, et al. The development of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells from normal human and RDEB epidermal keratinocytes. J Dermatol Sci. 2018;91:301-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2018.06.004.
Kobayashi H, Ebisawa K, Kambe M, et al. Effects of exosomes derived from the induced pluripotent stem cells on skin wound healing. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2018;80:141-153. https://doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.80.2.141.
Zhang J, Guan J, Niu X, et al. Exosomes released from human induced pluripotent stem cells-derived MSCs facilitate cutaneous wound healing by promoting collagen synthesis and angiogenesis. J Transl Med. 2015;13:49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-015-0417-0.
Kim KL, Song S-H, Choi K-S, Suh W. Cooperation of endothelial and smooth muscle cells derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells enhances neovascularization in dermal wounds. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013;19:2478-2485. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2012.0768.
Shen Y-I, Cho H, Papa AE, et al. Engineered human vascularized constructs accelerate diabetic wound healing. Biomaterials. 2016;102:107-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.009.
Gorecka J, Gao X, Fereydooni A, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived smooth muscle cells increase angiogenesis and accelerate diabetic wound healing. Regen Med. 2020;15:1277-1293. https://doi.org/10.2217/rme-2019-0086.
Gorecka J, Kostiuk V, Fereydooni A, et al. The potential and limitations of induced pluripotent stem cells to achieve wound healing. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10:87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-019-1185-1.
Lam GC, Sefton MV. Harnessing gene and drug delivery for vascularizing engineered tissue platforms. Drug Discov Today. 2016;21:1532-1539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2016.06.002.
Laiva AL, O'Brien FJ, Keogh MB. Innovations in gene and growth factor delivery systems for diabetic wound healing. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017;12:e296-e312. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2443.
Miller KJ, Brown DA, Ibrahim MM, Ramchal TD, Levinson H. MicroRNAs in skin tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;88:16-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2015.04.018.
Chouhan D, Dey N, Bhardwaj N, Mandal BB. Emerging and innovative approaches for wound healing and skin regeneration: current status and advances. Biomaterials. 2019;216:119267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119267.
Won YW, McGinn AN, Lee M, Nam K, Bull DA, Kim SW. Post-translational regulation of a hypoxia-responsive VEGF plasmid for the treatment of myocardial ischemia. Biomaterials. 2013;34:6229-6238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.04.061.
Barrientos S, Stojadinovic O, Golinko MS, Brem H, Tomic-Canic M. Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2008;16:585-601. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00410.x.
Peplow PV, Baxter GD. Gene expression and release of growth factors during delayed wound healing: a review of studies in diabetic animals and possible combined laser phototherapy and growth factor treatment to enhance healing. Photomed Laser Surg. 2012;30:617-636. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2012.3312.
Wahl EA, Schenck TL, Machens HG. Balmayor ER. VEGF released by deferoxamine preconditioned mesenchymal stem cells seeded on collagen-GAG substrates enhances neovascularization. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36879.
Crafts TD, Jensen AR, Blocher-Smith EC, Markel TA. Vascular endothelial growth factor: therapeutic possibilities and challenges for the treatment of ischemia. Cytokine. 2015;71:385-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2014.08.005.
Freudenberg U, Zieris A, Chwalek K, et al. Heparin desulfation modulates VEGF release and angiogenesis in diabetic wounds. J Control Release. 2015;220:79-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.10.028.
Yang Y, Xia T, Zhi W, et al. Promotion of skin regeneration in diabetic rats by electrospun core-sheath fibers loaded with basic fibroblast growth factor. Biomaterials. 2011;32:4243-4254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.042.
DeLong SA, Moon JJ, West JL. Covalently immobilized gradients of bFGF on hydrogel scaffolds for directed cell migration. Biomaterials. 2005;26:3227-3234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.021.
Zhao W, Han Q, Lin H, et al. Improved neovascularization and wound repair by targeting human basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) to fibrin. J Mol Med (Berl). 2008;86:1127-1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-008-0372-9.
Leonida MD, Kumar I. Bionanomaterials for Skin Regeneration; 2016. Switzerland: Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39168-7.
Lee K, Silva EA, Mooney DJ. Growth factor delivery-based tissue engineering: general approaches and a review of recent developments. J R Soc Interface. 2011;8:153-170. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2010.0223.
Xie Z, Paras CB, Weng H, et al. Dual growth factor releasing multi-functional nanofibers for wound healing. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:9351-9359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.07.030.
Bielefeld KA, Amini-Nik S, Alman BA. Cutaneous wound healing: recruiting developmental pathways for regeneration. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70:2059-2081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-012-1152-9.
Werner S, Grose R. Regulation of wound healing by growth factors and cytokines. Physiol Rev. 2003;83:835-870. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00031.2002.
Miscianinov V, Martello A, Rose L, et al. MicroRNA-148b targets the TGF-β pathway to regulate angiogenesis and endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition during skin wound healing. Mol Ther. 2018;26:1996-2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.05.002.
Riedel K, Riedel F, Goessler UR, Germann G, Sauerbier M. TGF-β antisense therapy increases angiogenic potential in human keratinocytes in vitro. Arch Med Res. 2007;38:45-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2006.04.010.
Finnson KW, Arany PR, Philip A. Transforming growth factor Beta signaling in cutaneous wound healing: lessons learned from animal studies. Adv Wound Care. 2013;2:225-237. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2012.0419.
Mastrullo V, Cathery W, Velliou E, Madeddu P, Campagnolo P. Angiogenesis in tissue engineering: as nature intended? Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:188.
Heath DE. A review of Decellularized extracellular matrix biomaterials for regenerative engineering applications. Regen Eng Transl Med. 2019;5:155-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40883-018-0080-0.
Laschke MW, Menger MD. Prevascularization in tissue engineering: current concepts and future directions. Biotechnol Adv. 2016;34:112-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.004.
Loh QL, Choong C. Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2012;19(6):1-61. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437.
Niu Y, Li Q, Ding Y, Dong L, Wang C. Engineered delivery strategies for enhanced control of growth factor activities in wound healing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;146:190-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2018.06.002.
Pereira RF, Barrias CC, Granja PL, Bartolo PJ. Advanced biofabrication strategies for skin regeneration and repair. Nanomedicine. 2013;8:603-621. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.13.50.
Imani R, Yousefzadeh M, Nour S. Functional nanofiber for drug delivery applications. In: Barhoum A, Bechelany M, Makhlouf A, eds. Handbook of Nanofibers, Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2018:1-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42789-8_34-1.
Choi JS, Kim HS, Yoo HS. Electrospinning strategies of drug-incorporated nanofibrous mats for wound recovery. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2015;5:137-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-013-0148-9.
Zhong S, Zhang Y, Lim CT. Fabrication of large pores in electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for cellular infiltration: a review. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2012;18:77-87. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2011.0390.
Gholipourmalekabadi M, Samadikuchaksaraei A, Seifalian AM, et al. Silk fibroin/amniotic membrane 3D bi-layered artificial skin. Biomed Mater. 2018;13(3):1-36.
Sheikh FA, Ju HW, Lee JM, et al. 3D electrospun silk fibroin nanofibers for fabrication of artificial skin. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2015;11:681-691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2014.11.007.
Chen S, Wang H, Su Y, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-laden, personalized 3D scaffolds with controlled structure and fiber alignment promote diabetic wound healing. Acta Biomater. 2020;108:153-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.035.
Skardal A, Mack D, Kapetanovic E, et al. Bioprinted amniotic fluid-derived stem cells accelerate healing of large skin wounds. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2012;1:792-802. https://doi.org/10.5966/sctm.2014-0253.
Ng WL, Wang S, Yeong WY, Naing MW. Skin bioprinting: impending reality or fantasy? Trends Biotechnol. 2016;34:689-699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.04.006.
Pang C, Ibrahim A, Bulstrode NW, Ferretti P. An overview of the therapeutic potential of regenerative medicine in cutaneous wound healing. Int Wound J. 2017;14:450-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12735.
Tang F, Manz XD, Bongers A, et al. Microchannels are an architectural Cue that promotes integration and vascularization of silk biomaterials in vivo. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6:1476-1486. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01624.
Kim HN, Hong Y, Kim MS, Kim SM, Suh K-Y. Effect of orientation and density of nanotopography in dermal wound healing. Biomaterials. 2012;33:8782-8792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.08.038.
Xie J, Macewan MR, Ray WZ, Liu W, Siewe DY, Xia Y. Radially aligned, electrospun nanofibers as dural substitutes for wound closure and tissue regeneration applications. ACS Nano. 2010;4:5027-5036. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn101554u.
Fang J, Hsueh Y-Y, Soto J, et al. Engineering biomaterials with micro/nanotechnologies for cell reprogramming. ACS Nano. 2020;14:1296-1318. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b04837.
Rnjak-Kovacina J, Gerrand Y, Wray LS, et al. Vascular pedicle and microchannels: simple methods toward effective in vivo vascularization of 3D scaffolds. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8:1901106. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201901106.
Liu M, Duan XP, Li YM, Yang DP, Long YZ. Electrospun nanofibers for wound healing. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;76:1413-1423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.034.
Dimatteo R, Darling NJ, Segura T. In situ forming injectable hydrogels for drug delivery and wound repair. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;127:167-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2018.03.007.
Sun L, Gao W, Fu X, et al. Enhanced wound healing in diabetic rats by nanofibrous scaffolds mimicking the basketweave pattern of collagen fibrils in native skin. Biomater Sci. 2018;6:340-349. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7BM00545H.
Li Z, Qu T, Ding C, et al. Injectable gelatin derivative hydrogels with sustained vascular endothelial growth factor release for induced angiogenesis. Acta Biomater. 2015;13:88-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.002.
Chaudhari A, Vig K, Baganizi D, et al. Future prospects for scaffolding methods and biomaterials in skin tissue engineering: a review. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:1974. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17121974.
Browne S, Monaghan MG, Brauchle E, et al. Modulation of inflammation and angiogenesis and changes in ECM GAG-activity via dual delivery of nucleic acids. Biomaterials. 2015;69:133-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.012.
Losi P, Briganti E, Magera A, et al. Tissue response to poly(ether)urethane-polydimethylsiloxane-fibrin composite scaffolds for controlled delivery of pro-angiogenic growth factors. Biomaterials. 2010;31:5336-5344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.033.
Rnjak-Kovacina J, Tang F, Whitelock JM, Lord MS. Glycosaminoglycan and proteoglycan-based biomaterials: current trends and future perspectives. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201701042.
Moore EM, West JL. Harnessing macrophages for vascularization in tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng. 2019;47:354-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-018-02170-4.
Rnjak-Kovacina J, Tang F, Lin X, Whitelock JM, Lord MS. Recombinant domain V of human Perlecan is a bioactive vascular proteoglycan. Biotechnol J. 2017;12(12):1-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201700196.
Lisovsky A, Chamberlain MD, Wells LA, Sefton MV. Cell interactions with vascular regenerative MAA-based materials in the context of wound healing. Adv Healthc Mater. 2015;4:2375-2387. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201500192.
Fitzpatrick LE, Lisovsky A, Sefton MV. The expression of sonic hedgehog in diabetic wounds following treatment with poly(methacrylic acid-co-methyl methacrylate) beads. Biomaterials. 2012;33:5297-5307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.008.
Martin DC, Semple JL, Sefton MV. Poly(methacrylic acid-co-methyl methacrylate) beads promote vascularization and wound repair in diabetic mice. J Biomed Mater Res-Part A. 2010;93:484-492. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32528.
Kasiewicz LN, Whitehead KA. Recent advances in biomaterials for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Biomater Sci. 2017;5:1962-1975. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7BM00264E.
Wells LA, Sefton MV. The effect of methacrylic acid in smooth coatings on dTHP1 and HUVEC gene expression. Biomater Sci. 2014;2:1768-1778. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4bm00159a.
Wang Z, Wang Z, Lu WW, Zhen W, Yang D, Peng S. Novel biomaterial strategies for controlled growth factor delivery for biomedical applications. NPG Asia Mater. 2017;9:e435-e417. https://doi.org/10.1038/am.2017.179.
Berthet M, Gauthier Y, Lacroix C, Verrier B, Monge C. Nanoparticle-based dressing: the future of wound treatment? Trends Biotechnol. 2017;35:770-784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.05.005.
Lai HJ, Kuan CH, Wu HC, et al. Tailored design of electrospun composite nanofibers with staged release of multiple angiogenic growth factors for chronic wound healing. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:4156-4166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.05.001.
Fercana GR, Yerneni S, Billaud M, et al. Perivascular extracellular matrix hydrogels mimic native matrix microarchitecture and promote angiogenesis via basic fibroblast growth factor. Biomaterials. 2017;123:142-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.037.
Kim TH, Jung Y, Kim SH. Nanofibrous electrospun heart decellularized extracellular matrix-based hybrid scaffold as wound dressing for reducing scarring in wound healing. Tissue Eng Part A. 2017;24:830-848. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2017.0318.
Morissette Martin P, Grant A, Hamilton DW, Flynn LE. Matrix composition in 3-D collagenous bioscaffolds modulates the survival and angiogenic phenotype of human chronic wound dermal fibroblasts. Acta Biomater. 2019;83:199-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.10.042.
Milan PB, Lotfibakhshaiesh N, Joghataie MT, et al. Accelerated wound healing in a diabetic rat model using decellularized dermal matrix and human umbilical cord perivascular cells. Acta Biomater. 2016;45:234-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.08.053.
Cerqueira MT, Pirraco RP, Martins AR, Santos TC, Reis RL, Marques AP. Cell sheet technology-driven re-epithelialization and neovascularization of skin wounds. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:3145-3155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.006.
Tang Z, Okano T. Recent development of temperature-responsive surfaces and their application for cell sheet engineering. Regen Biomater. 2014;1:91-102. https://doi.org/10.1093/rb/rbu011.
Schenck TL, Hopfner U, Chávez MN, et al. Photosynthetic biomaterials: a pathway towards autotrophic tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2015;15:39-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.12.012.
Hopfner U, Schenck T-L, Chávez M-N, et al. Development of photosynthetic biomaterials for in vitro tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:2712-2717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.055.
Najafi R, Sharifi AM. Deferoxamine preconditioning potentiates mesenchymal stem cell homing in vitro and in streptozotocin-diabetic rats. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2013;13:959-972. https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2013.782390.
Poggiali E, Cassinerio E, Zanaboni L, Cappellini MD. An update on iron chelation therapy. Blood Transfus. 2012;10:411-422. https://doi.org/10.2450/2012.0008-12.
Chen H, Jia P, Kang H, et al. Upregulating Hif-1α by hydrogel nanofibrous scaffolds for rapidly recruiting angiogenesis relative cells in diabetic wound. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5:907-918. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201501018.
Hou Z, Nie C, Si Z, Ma Y. Deferoxamine enhances neovascularization and accelerates wound healing in diabetic rats via the accumulation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013;101:62-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2013.04.012.
Duscher D, Neofytou E, Wong VW, et al. Transdermal deferoxamine prevents pressure-induced diabetic ulcers. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112:94-99. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1413445112.
Chen H, Guo L, Wicks J, et al. Quickly promoting angiogenesis by using a DFO-loaded photo-crosslinked gelatin hydrogel for diabetic skin regeneration. J Mater Chem B. 2016;4:3770-3781. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TB00065G.
Rassu G, Salis A, Porcu EP, Giunchedi P, Roldo M, Gavini E. Composite chitosan/alginate hydrogel for controlled release of deferoxamine: a system to potentially treat iron dysregulation diseases. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;136:1338-1347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.048.
Farsaei S, Khalili H, Farboud ES. Potential role of statins on wound healing: review of the literature. Int Wound J. 2012;9:238-247.
Rezvanian M, Amin MCIM, Ng S-F. Development and physicochemical characterization of alginate composite film loaded with simvastatin as a potential wound dressing. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;137:295-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.091.
Cínthia A, Irami R, Filho A, Damasceno BPGL, Sócrates E, Egito T. Simvastatin improves the healing of infected skin wounds of rats. Acta Cirúrgica Bras. 2007;22:57-63.
Asai J, Takenaka H, Hirakawa S, et al. Topical simvastatin accelerates wound healing in diabetes by enhancing angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Am J Pathol. 2012;181:2217-2224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.08.023.
Kimáková P, Solár P, Solárová Z, Komel R, Debeljak N. Erythropoietin and its angiogenic activity. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:1519. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18071519.
Elsherbiny A, Högger DC, Borozadi MK, et al. EPO reverses defective wound repair in hypercholesterolaemic mice by increasing functional angiogenesis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2012;65:1559-1568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2012.05.006.
De Luisi A, Binetti L, Ria R, et al. Erythropoietin is involved in the angiogenic potential of bone marrow macrophages in multiple myeloma. Angiogenesis. 2013;16:963-973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-013-9369-2.
Soybir G, Topuzlu C, Odabaş Ö, Dolay K, Bilir A, Köksoy F. The effects of melatonin on angiogenesis and wound healing. Surg Today. 2003;33:896-901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-003-2621-3.
Song R, Ren L, Ma H, et al. Melatonin promotes diabetic wound healing in vitro by regulating keratinocyte activity. Am J Transl Res. 2016;8:4682-4693.
Jin H, Zhang Z, Wang C, et al. Melatonin protects endothelial progenitor cells against AGE-induced apoptosis via autophagy flux stimulation and promotes wound healing in diabetic mice. Exp Mol Med. 2018;50:154-115. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-018-0177-z.
Rahman S, Carter P, Bhattarai N. Aloe Vera for tissue engineering applications. J Funct Biomater. 2017;8(6):1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb8010006.
Sanchez LW, Watson RR. Fruits, vegetables, and herbs: Bioactive foods promoting wound healing. Fruits, vegetables, and herbs. In: Fruits, Vegetables, and Herbs: Bioactive Foods in Health Promotion, USA: Elsevier Inc.; 2016;451-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802972-5.00021-4.
Hajian M, Mahmoodi M, Imani R. In vitro assessment of poly (vinyl alcohol) film incorporating Aloe Vera for potential application as a wound dressing. J Macromol Sci Part B. 2017;56:435-450. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222348.2017.1330183.
Radha MH, Laxmipriya NP. Evaluation of biological properties and clinical effectiveness of Aloe vera: a systematic review. J Tradit Complement Med. 2015;5:21-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcme.2014.10.006.
Suganya S, Venugopal J, Agnes Mary S, Ramakrishna S, Lakshmi BS, Giri Dev VR. Aloe vera incorporated biomimetic nanofibrous scaffold: a regenerative approach for skin tissue engineering. Iran Polym J. 2014;23:237-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-013-0219-2.
Oryan A, Mohammadalipour A, Moshiri A, Tabandeh MR. Topical application of Aloe vera accelerated wound healing, modeling, and remodeling. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;77:37-46.
Moon EJ, Lee YM, Lee OH, et al. A novel angiogenic factor derived from Aloe vera gel: beta-sitosterol. A Plant Sterol Angiogenesis. 1999;3:117-123. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009058232389.
Hormozi M, Assaei R, Beigi M. The effect of Aloe vera on the expression of wound healing factors (TGFβ1 and bFGF) in mouse embryonic fibroblast cell: in vitro study. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;88:610-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.01.095.
Kulkarni YA, Garud MS, Oza MJ, Barve KH, Gaikwad AB. Diabetes, diabetic complications, and flavonoids. In: Fruits, Veg. Herbs, USA: Elsevier Inc.; 2016;77-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2015-0-01705-1.
Tsakiroglou P, VandenAkker EN, Del Bo' C, Riso P, Klimis-Zacas D. Role of berry anthocyanins and phenolic acids on cell migration and angiogenesis: an updated overview. Nutr. 2019;11:1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11051075.
Tsakiroglou P, Weber J, Ashworth S, Del Bo C, Klimis-Zacas D. Phenolic and anthocyanin fractions from wild blueberries (V. angustifolium) differentially modulate endothelial cell migration partially through RHOA and RAC1. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120:11056-11067. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.28383.
Shiravi A, Sayyad Zomorrodi M. The study effect of Rubus fruticosus extract on cutaneous wound healing in diabetic Wistar rat. Iran J Diabetes Metab. 2015;15:1-8.
Arnold G. Berries and blood pressure. In: Fruits, Veg. Herbs, USA: Elsevier Inc.; 2016:313-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802972-5.00015-9.
Iriti M, Maria Varoni E. Grape bioactives for human health. In: Fruits, Veg. Herbs, USA: Elsevier Inc.; 2016:221-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802972-5.00011-1.
Alah gahi F, Shiravi A, Hojati V. Effect of alcoholic extract of grape (Vitis vinifera) on wound healing diabetic male Wistar rats. Iran J Diabetes Metab. 2017;15:177-182.
Rajakumari R, Volova T, Oluwafemi OS, Rajeshkumar S, Thomas S, Kalarikkal N. Nano formulated proanthocyanidins as an effective wound healing component. Mater Sci Eng C. 2020;106:110056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110056.
Ma H, Zhou Q, Chang J, Wu C. Grape seed-inspired smart hydrogel scaffolds for melanoma therapy and wound healing. ACS Nano. 2019;13:4302-4311. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b09496.
Locilento DA, Mercante LA, Andre RS, et al. Biocompatible and biodegradable electrospun nanofibrous membranes loaded with grape seed extract for wound dressing application. J Nanomater. 2019;2019:1-11.
Lin S, Chen M, Jiang H, et al. Green electrospun grape seed extract-loaded silk fibroin nanofibrous mats with excellent cytocompatibility and antioxidant effect. Colloids Surf B. 2016;139:156-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.12.001.
Mogoşanu GD, Grumezescu AM. Natural and synthetic polymers for wounds and burns dressing. Int J Pharm. 2014;463:127-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.12.015.
Shojaee M, Navaee F, Jalili-Firoozinezhad S, Faturechi R, Majidi M, Bonakdar S. Fabrication and characterization of ovalbumin films for wound dressing applications. Mater Sci Eng C. 2015;48:158-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.11.063.
Jalili-Firoozinezhad S, Rajabi-Zeleti S, Mohammadi P, et al. Facile fabrication of egg white macroporous sponges for tissue regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater. 2015;4:2281-2290. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201500482.
You R, Zhang J, Gu S, et al. Regenerated egg white/silk fibroin composite films for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;79:430-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.063.
Zahedi P, Fallah-Darrehchi M. Electrospun egg albumin-PVA nanofibers containing tetracycline hydrochloride: morphological, drug release, antibacterial, thermal and mechanical properties. Fibers Polym. 2015;16:2184-2192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-015-5457-9.
Charernsriwilaiwat N, Opanasopit P, Rojanarata T, Ngawhirunpat T. Lysozyme-loaded, electrospun chitosan-based nanofiber mats for wound healing. Int J Pharm. 2012;427:379-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.02.010.
Rathna GVN, Jog JP, Gaikwad AB. Development of non-woven nanofibers of egg albumen-poly (vinyl alcohol) blends: influence of solution properties on morphology of nanofibers. Polym J. 2011;43:654-661. https://doi.org/10.1038/pj.2011.34.
Etulain J, Mena HA, Meiss RP, Frechtel G, Gutt S. An optimised protocol for platelet-rich plasma preparation to improve its angiogenic and regenerative properties. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19419-6.
Long DW, Johnson NR, Jeffries EM, Wang Y. Controlled delivery of platelet-derived proteins enhances porcine wound healing. J Control Release. 2017). 253, 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.03.021.
Ratajczak J, Vangansewinkel T, Gervois P, Merckx G, Hilkens P, Quirynen M, et al. Angiogenic properties of ‘leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin’ 2018:1-10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32936-8.
Tanideh N, Abdordideh E, Yousefabad SLA, et al. Evaluation of the healing effect of honey and colostrum in treatment of cutaneous wound in rat. Comp Clin Pathol. 2017;26:71-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-016-2347-5.
Esmaeili H, Dehghan MM, Rabbani M, Haririan E. Effect of bovine colostrum on open wound healing in Guinea pigs. Razi J Med Sci. 2014;21:66-74.
El-Kased RF, Amer RI, Attia D, Elmazar MM. Honey-based hydrogel: in vitro and comparative in vivo evaluation for burn wound healing. Sci Rep. 2017;7:9692. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08771-8.
Oryan A, Alemzadeh E, Moshiri A. Biological properties and therapeutic activities of honey in wound healing: a narrative review and meta-analysis. J Tissue Viability. 2016;25:98-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2015.12.002.
Ghizlane H, Aziz B. Pharmacological properties of some medicinal plants, its components and using fields. In: Fruits, Veg. Herbs, USA: Elsevier Inc.; 2016:41-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2015-0-01705-1.
Borda LJ, Macquhae FE, Kirsner RS. Wound dressings: a comprehensive review. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2016;5:287-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13671-016-0162-5.
Sun G, Zhang X, Shen Y-I, et al. Dextran hydrogel scaffolds enhance angiogenic responses and promote complete skin regeneration during burn wound healing. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108:20976-20981. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1115973108.
Riahi N, Liberelle B, Henry O, De Crescenzo G. Impact of RGD amount in dextran-based hydrogels for cell delivery. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;161:219-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.002.
Martin JR, Nelson CE, Gupta MK, et al. Local delivery of PHD2 siRNA from ROS-degradable scaffolds to promote diabetic wound healing. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5:2751-2757. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600820.
Kirker KR, Luo Y, Nielson JH, Shelby J, Prestwich GD. Glycosaminoglycan hydrogel films for wound healing. Biomaterials. 2001;50:3661-3671.