Development and implementation of a logic model: Occupational stress, physical activity, and sedentary behavior in the workplace.

Public health practice evaluation health promotion interventions logic model mental health workplace

Journal

Work (Reading, Mass.)
ISSN: 1875-9270
Titre abrégé: Work
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9204382

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
pubmed: 29 9 2020
medline: 10 6 2021
entrez: 28 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

An increasing level of occupational stress is a major problem in the workplace that requires innovative approaches and strategies. An understudied research area pertains to the effects that physical activity performed during the workday have on occupational stress. To determine if and how an intervention that increases physical activity and reduces sedentary behavior affects workplace stress. The population of interest are employees at a large university medical center including supportive staff, healthcare professionals, physicians, and faculty members; the study design is longitudinal; the approach is the implementation of an innovative workplace program (i.e., the Booster Break). We present a logic model promoting physical activity and reducing sitting time during the workday as a feasible and practical strategy to cope with occupational stress. The logic model approach emphasizes that funding, partnerships, and incentives are inputs to implementing program activities such as Booster Break sessions, weekly meetings, social support, and personal self-monitoring. Short-term outcomes were categorized as psychosocial, goal setting, organizational, and social; intermediate outcomes were behavioral and psychosocial; and long-term outcomes were health status and physiological status. This study is the first known effort to outline a comprehensive intervention based on changing physical activity and sedentary behavior during the workday and the concomitant effects on occupational stress. The findings of this study can be used to develop and implement interventions at workplaces to target increases in physical activity, decreases in sedentary time, and improvements in overall employee health.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
An increasing level of occupational stress is a major problem in the workplace that requires innovative approaches and strategies. An understudied research area pertains to the effects that physical activity performed during the workday have on occupational stress.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To determine if and how an intervention that increases physical activity and reduces sedentary behavior affects workplace stress. The population of interest are employees at a large university medical center including supportive staff, healthcare professionals, physicians, and faculty members; the study design is longitudinal; the approach is the implementation of an innovative workplace program (i.e., the Booster Break).
METHODS METHODS
We present a logic model promoting physical activity and reducing sitting time during the workday as a feasible and practical strategy to cope with occupational stress.
RESULTS RESULTS
The logic model approach emphasizes that funding, partnerships, and incentives are inputs to implementing program activities such as Booster Break sessions, weekly meetings, social support, and personal self-monitoring. Short-term outcomes were categorized as psychosocial, goal setting, organizational, and social; intermediate outcomes were behavioral and psychosocial; and long-term outcomes were health status and physiological status.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This study is the first known effort to outline a comprehensive intervention based on changing physical activity and sedentary behavior during the workday and the concomitant effects on occupational stress. The findings of this study can be used to develop and implement interventions at workplaces to target increases in physical activity, decreases in sedentary time, and improvements in overall employee health.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32986642
pii: WOR203266
doi: 10.3233/WOR-203266
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

203-213

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Auteurs

Wendell C Taylor (WC)

The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA.

Bhibha M Das (BM)

East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.

Raheem J Paxton (RJ)

University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.

Ross Shegog (R)

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Richard R Suminski (RR)

University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.

Stephanie R Johnson (SR)

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Omotola A Akintola (OA)

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Asmaa Hammad (A)

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Monica K Guidry (MK)

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH