Dynamics of a Protein Interaction Network Associated to the Aggregation of polyQ-Expanded Ataxin-1.


Journal

Genes
ISSN: 2073-4425
Titre abrégé: Genes (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101551097

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 09 2020
Historique:
received: 20 08 2020
revised: 14 09 2020
accepted: 23 09 2020
entrez: 30 9 2020
pubmed: 1 10 2020
medline: 16 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Several experimental models of polyglutamine (polyQ) diseases have been previously developed that are useful for studying disease progression in the primarily affected central nervous system. However, there is a missing link between cellular and animal models that would indicate the molecular defects occurring in neurons and are responsible for the disease phenotype in vivo. Here, we used a computational approach to identify dysregulated pathways shared by an in vitro and an in vivo model of ATXN1(Q82) protein aggregation, the mutant protein that causes the neurodegenerative polyQ disease spinocerebellar ataxia type-1 (SCA1). A set of common dysregulated pathways were identified, which were utilized to construct cerebellum-specific protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks at various time-points of protein aggregation. Analysis of a SCA1 network indicated important nodes which regulate its function and might represent potential pharmacological targets. Furthermore, a set of drugs interacting with these nodes and predicted to enter the blood-brain barrier (BBB) was identified. Our study points to molecular mechanisms of SCA1 linked from both cellular and animal models and suggests drugs that could be tested to determine whether they affect the aggregation of pathogenic ATXN1 and SCA1 disease progression.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Several experimental models of polyglutamine (polyQ) diseases have been previously developed that are useful for studying disease progression in the primarily affected central nervous system. However, there is a missing link between cellular and animal models that would indicate the molecular defects occurring in neurons and are responsible for the disease phenotype in vivo.
METHODS
Here, we used a computational approach to identify dysregulated pathways shared by an in vitro and an in vivo model of ATXN1(Q82) protein aggregation, the mutant protein that causes the neurodegenerative polyQ disease spinocerebellar ataxia type-1 (SCA1).
RESULTS
A set of common dysregulated pathways were identified, which were utilized to construct cerebellum-specific protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks at various time-points of protein aggregation. Analysis of a SCA1 network indicated important nodes which regulate its function and might represent potential pharmacological targets. Furthermore, a set of drugs interacting with these nodes and predicted to enter the blood-brain barrier (BBB) was identified.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study points to molecular mechanisms of SCA1 linked from both cellular and animal models and suggests drugs that could be tested to determine whether they affect the aggregation of pathogenic ATXN1 and SCA1 disease progression.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32992839
pii: genes11101129
doi: 10.3390/genes11101129
pmc: PMC7600199
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Ataxin-1 0
Atxn1 protein, mouse 0
Nerve Tissue Proteins 0
Peptides 0
polyglutamine 26700-71-0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Références

Nat Neurosci. 2018 Oct;21(10):1341-1349
pubmed: 30258241
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jan 15;24(2):282-4
pubmed: 18006545
Curr Opin Neurol. 2011 Aug;24(4):339-45
pubmed: 21734495
Mol Biol Cell. 2016 Dec 15;27(25):4055-4066
pubmed: 27798233
Annu Rev Biochem. 2015;84:435-64
pubmed: 25784053
Brain Res Bull. 2012 Feb 10;87(2-3):350-8
pubmed: 21272617
J Biol Chem. 2014 Mar 7;289(10):6709-26
pubmed: 24407293
Nat Commun. 2013;4:1511
pubmed: 23443539
Genomics. 1993 Dec;18(3):627-35
pubmed: 8307572
PLoS One. 2009 Dec 15;4(12):e8287
pubmed: 20016831
J Neurochem. 2011 Oct;119(2):398-407
pubmed: 21854390
Front Genet. 2015 Aug 19;6:257
pubmed: 26347769
Stem Cell Res. 2018 May;29:125-128
pubmed: 29656178
Redox Biol. 2020 May;32:101458
pubmed: 32145456
Neuron. 2016 Mar 16;89(6):1194-1207
pubmed: 26948890
Cell. 1995 Sep 22;82(6):937-48
pubmed: 7553854
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 18;9(1):10442
pubmed: 31320657
Nat Biotechnol. 2010 May;28(5):511-5
pubmed: 20436464
Dev Cell. 2011 Oct 18;21(4):746-57
pubmed: 22014525
Exp Cell Res. 2013 Sep 10;319(15):2384-94
pubmed: 23830879
Cell. 2006 Nov 17;127(4):697-708
pubmed: 17110330
J Chem Inf Model. 2014 Apr 28;54(4):1050-60
pubmed: 24597646
Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Feb;5(2):101-13
pubmed: 14735121
Nature. 2008 Apr 10;452(7188):713-8
pubmed: 18337722
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D1091-7
pubmed: 24203711
Front Genet. 2016 Jun 14;7:111
pubmed: 27379161
J Cell Biol. 2012 Apr 16;197(2):167-77
pubmed: 22508507
Cell. 1995 Apr 7;81(1):53-62
pubmed: 7536630
BMC Syst Biol. 2018 Jul 31;12(1):80
pubmed: 30064421
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 31;12:357
pubmed: 21880147
J Biol Chem. 2019 Feb 22;294(8):2757-2770
pubmed: 30593503
FEBS Lett. 2015 Jun 22;589(14):1607-19
pubmed: 25980603
Neuron. 2002 Jun 13;34(6):905-19
pubmed: 12086639
Genome Res. 2003 Nov;13(11):2498-504
pubmed: 14597658
PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Apr 20;3(4):e59
pubmed: 17447836
Methods. 2012 Aug;57(4):499-507
pubmed: 22749929
Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jul;39(Web Server issue):W455-61
pubmed: 21609954
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D607-D613
pubmed: 30476243
Proteomics. 2012 May;12(10):1706-16
pubmed: 22593007
Syst Synth Biol. 2014 Mar;8(1):73-81
pubmed: 24592293
Neuron. 2005 Jul 7;47(1):29-41
pubmed: 15996546
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jul 1;24(13):i277-85
pubmed: 18586725
Cell Rep. 2015 May 19;11(7):1134-46
pubmed: 25959826
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jul 8;44(W1):W90-7
pubmed: 27141961
Cerebellum. 2005;4(1):62-73
pubmed: 15895563
Cell. 2005 Aug 26;122(4):633-44
pubmed: 16122429
Genes Dev. 2008 Jun 1;22(11):1427-38
pubmed: 18519635
Elife. 2015 Mar 04;4:
pubmed: 25738228
Neuron. 2012 Jul 12;75(1):41-57
pubmed: 22794259
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 05;8(12):e82160
pubmed: 24340000
Genes Dev. 2020 Sep 1;34(17-18):1147-1160
pubmed: 32763910
Gene Regul Syst Bio. 2008 May 15;2:193-201
pubmed: 19787083
Neuron. 2018 Mar 21;97(6):1235-1243.e5
pubmed: 29526553
PeerJ. 2015 Jun 30;3:e1054
pubmed: 26157623
Cell. 2006 Dec 29;127(7):1335-47
pubmed: 17190598
Brain Pathol. 2009 Oct;19(4):573-85
pubmed: 18662234
Science. 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):824-7
pubmed: 12399590

Auteurs

Aimilia-Christina Vagiona (AC)

Department of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.

Miguel A Andrade-Navarro (MA)

Faculty of Biology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Biozentrum I, Hans-Dieter-Hüsch-Weg 15, 55128 Mainz, Germany.

Fotis Psomopoulos (F)

Institute of Applied Biosciences/Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.

Spyros Petrakis (S)

Institute of Applied Biosciences/Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH