Chronic use of statins and risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
ERCP
inflammation
injury
pancreas
statin
Journal
Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology
ISSN: 1747-4132
Titre abrégé: Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101278199
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
1
10
2020
medline:
25
2
2023
entrez:
30
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is limited evidence on the role of chronic statin therapy in the prevention of acute pancreatitis after ERCP. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of statins in the prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Bibliographic search was performed through May 2020. The primary outcome was post-ERCP pancreatitis rate. An additional endpoint was the rate of severe pancreatitis. Nine studies, of which 1 prospective and 8 retrospective series, with 9374 patients were included. Baseline clinical and technical features were well balanced between the two study groups. Overall, pooled rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 4.8% (3.2%-6.4%) in the statin group and 7.1% (5.9%-8.3%) in the control group, with no difference in terms of pancreatitis rate (odds ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.43-1.02). This finding was confirmed in the multivariate analysis adjusted for several clinical and technical characteristics (adjusted odds ratio 0.68, 0.40-1.15). No difference was observed between the two study groups in terms of severe pancreatitis rate (odds ratio 1.07, 0.61-1.89). Our meta-analysis seems to suggest the non-superiority of chronic statin therapy in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
There is limited evidence on the role of chronic statin therapy in the prevention of acute pancreatitis after ERCP. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of statins in the prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
METHODS
Bibliographic search was performed through May 2020. The primary outcome was post-ERCP pancreatitis rate. An additional endpoint was the rate of severe pancreatitis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Nine studies, of which 1 prospective and 8 retrospective series, with 9374 patients were included. Baseline clinical and technical features were well balanced between the two study groups. Overall, pooled rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 4.8% (3.2%-6.4%) in the statin group and 7.1% (5.9%-8.3%) in the control group, with no difference in terms of pancreatitis rate (odds ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.43-1.02). This finding was confirmed in the multivariate analysis adjusted for several clinical and technical characteristics (adjusted odds ratio 0.68, 0.40-1.15). No difference was observed between the two study groups in terms of severe pancreatitis rate (odds ratio 1.07, 0.61-1.89).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis seems to suggest the non-superiority of chronic statin therapy in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32993442
doi: 10.1080/17474124.2021.1829471
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Video-Audio Media
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM