Clinicopathological Features and Outcomes in Individuals with Breast Cancer and ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2 Mutations.


Journal

Annals of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1534-4681
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9420840

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 20 06 2020
accepted: 02 09 2020
pubmed: 1 10 2020
medline: 18 5 2021
entrez: 30 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The moderate-penetrance germline mutations ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 are implicated in an increased risk of the development of breast cancer. Whether these mutations provide clinical utility to guide treatment strategies and prognosis remains unknown. A retrospective case-control study from a tertiary institution compared patients with stage 0-III breast cancer, and positive for ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2 mutations, with a matched cohort selected by randomization and negative for mutations. Data acquisition included demographics, histopathologic, treatment, and clinical outcome variables. A total of 145 patients with breast cancer (144 female and 1 male) were analyzed-74 mutation-positive patients (24 ATM, 26 CHEK2, 24 PALB2) and 71 mutation-negative patients. Mutation-positive patients compared with mutation-negative patients had increased family history of breast cancer (79.7 vs. 52.9%, p < 0.001) and tumor size > 2.0 cm (63.1% vs. 42.3%, p = 0.015). Patients with prior knowledge of mutational status were more likely to proceed with total mastectomy and prophylactic mastectomy (74.5% vs. 25.5%, p < 0.02; and 65.5% vs. 34.5%, p < 0.001, respectively). The unadjusted recurrence rate was higher in mutation-positive patients compared with mutation-negative patients (24.3 vs. 8.5%, p = 0.01), although mutation status was not predictive for recurrence in Cox regression analysis. Patients positive for ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2 mutations had increased tumor size and were more likely to undergo extensive surgeries. Mutation status was not predictive of recurrence, although this lack of effect may have been mitigated by lower rates of recurrence in those who pursued total mastectomy. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32996020
doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09158-2
pii: 10.1245/s10434-020-09158-2
doi:

Substances chimiques

Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group N Protein 0
PALB2 protein, human 0
Checkpoint Kinase 2 EC 2.7.1.11
ATM protein, human EC 2.7.11.1
Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins EC 2.7.11.1
CHEK2 protein, human EC 2.7.11.1

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3383-3393

Références

Waks AG, Winer EP. Breast cancer treatment: a review. JAMA. 2019;321(3):288–300.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19323
Harbeck N, Penault-Llorca F, Cortes J, et al. Breast cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5:1–31.
doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0111-2
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A Cancer statistics, 2020. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2020; 70(1): 7–30
Daly MB, Pilarski R, Berry M, Buys SS, Farmer M, Friedman S, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian, version 2.2017. J Nat Comprehensive Cancer Netw. 2020;18(4):380-391.
doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0017
Finch AP, Lubinski J, Møller P, et al. Impact of oophorectomy on cancer incidence and mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(15):1547–1553.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.2820
Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Singer CF, et al. Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality. JAMA. 2010;304(9):967–975.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1237
Desmond A, Kurian AW, Gabree M, et al. Clinical actionability of multigene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk assessment. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(7):943–951.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2690
Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Ravdin PM, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, et al. Clinical and genomic risk to guide the use of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(25): 2395.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1904819
Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF, et al. Prospective validation of a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(21):2005–2014.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510764
Swift M, Morrell D, Massey RB, Chase CL. Incidence of cancer in 161 families affected by ataxia-telangiectasia. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(26):1831-1836.
doi: 10.1056/NEJM199112263252602
Meijers-Heijboer H, van den Ouweland A, Klijn J, et al. Low-penetrance susceptibility to breast cancer due to CHEK2(*)1100delC in noncarriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Nat Genet. 2002;31(1): 55–59.
doi: 10.1038/ng879
Friedrichsen DM, Malone KE, Doody DR, Daling JR, Ostrander EA. Frequency of CHEK2 mutations in a population based, case-control study of breast cancer in young women. Breast Cancer Res. 2004;6(6):R629–R635.
doi: 10.1186/bcr933
Couch FJ, Shimelis H, Hu C, et al. Associations between cancer predisposition testing panel genes and breast cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(9):1190–1196.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0424
Zhou J, Wang H, Fu F, et al. Spectrum of PALB2 germline mutations and characteristics of PALB2-related breast cancer: screening of 16,501 unselected patients with breast cancer and 5890 controls by next-generation sequencing. Cancer. 2020;126(14):3202–3208.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.32905
Easton DF, Pharoah PD, Antoniou AC. Gene-panel sequencing and the prediction of breast-cancer risk. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2243–2257.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1501341
Cybulski C, Kluzniak W, Huzarski T, et al. Clinical outcomes in women with breast cancer and a PALB2 mutation: a prospective cohort analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:638–644.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70142-7
Meyer A, Dörk T, Sohn C, Karstens JH, Bremer M. Breast cancer in patients carrying a germ-line CHEK2 mutation: outcome after breast conserving surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2007;82(3):349–353.
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.12.002
Bozhanov SS, Angelova SG, Krasteva ME, et al. Alterations in p53, BRCA1, ATM, PIK3CA, and HER2 genes and their effect in modifying clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival of Bulgarian patients with breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010;136(11):1657–1669.
doi: 10.1007/s00432-010-0824-9
Murphy JO, Sacchini VS. Breast cancer in BRCA mutation carriers: breast-conserving therapy or bilateral mastectomy? Clin Pract. 2013;10:751–764
doi: 10.2217/cpr.13.72
Kaas R, Verhoef S, Wesseling J, et al. Prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: very low risk for subsequent breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;251(3):488–492.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c3c36d
Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1227–1232.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020989
Kurian AW, Ward KC, Abrahamse P, et al. Association of germline genetic testing results with locoregional and systemic therapy in patients with breast cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(4): e196400.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.6400
Naslund-Koch C, Nordestgaard BG, Bojesen SE. Increased risk for other cancers in addition to breast cancer for CHEK2*1100delC heterozygotes estimated from the copenhagen general population study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1208–1216.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.3594
The CHEK2 Breast Cancer Case-Control Consortium. CHEK2*1100delC and susceptibility to breast cancer: a collaborative analysis involving 10,860 breast cancer cases and 9,065 controls from ten studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74: 1175–1182
doi: 10.1086/421251
Antoniou AC, Casadei S, Heikkinen T. Breast-cancer risk in families with mutations in PALB2. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:497–506.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1400382
Abdel-Fatah TM, Arora A, Alsubhi N, et al. Clinicopathological significance of ATM-Chk2 expression in sporadic breast cancers: a comprehensive analysis in large cohorts. Neoplasia. 2014;16(11):982–991.
doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2014.09.009
Heikkinen T, Kärkkäinen H, Aaltonen K, et al. The breast cancer susceptibility mutation PALB2 1592delT is associated with an aggressive tumor phenotype. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(9):3214–3222.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-3128
Kriege M, Hollestelle A, Jager A, et al. Survival and contralateral breast cancer in CHEK2 1100delC breast cancer patients: impact of adjuvant chemotherapy. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(5):1004–1013.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.306
Schmidt MK, Tollenaar RA, de Kemp SR, et al. Breast cancer survival and tumor characteristics in premenopausal women carrying the CHEK2*1100delC germline mutation. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(1):64–69.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.3024

Auteurs

Colin Bergstrom (C)

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. cbergstr1288@gmail.com.

Colton Pence (C)

University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA.

Jordan Berg (J)

Cancer Genetics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Natalia Partain (N)

Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Navid Sadeghi (N)

Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, TX, USA.

Caitlin Mauer (C)

Cancer Genetics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Sara Pirzadeh-Miller (S)

Cancer Genetics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Ang Gao (A)

Department of Population and Data Science, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Hsiao Li (H)

Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, TX, USA.

Nisha Unni (N)

Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Samira Syed (S)

Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, TX, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH