How large is the periablational zone after radiofrequency and microwave ablation? Computer-based comparative study of two currently used clinical devices.
Microwave ablation
moderate hyperthermic heating
periablational zone
radiofrequency ablation
thermal ablation
tumor ablation
Journal
International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group
ISSN: 1464-5157
Titre abrégé: Int J Hyperthermia
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8508395
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
entrez:
30
9
2020
pubmed:
1
10
2020
medline:
25
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare the size of the coagulation (CZ) and periablational (PZ) zones created with two commercially available devices in clinical use for radiofrequency (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), respectively. Computer models were used to simulate RFA with a 3-cm Cool-tip applicator and MWA with an Amica-Gen applicator. The Arrhenius model was used to compute the damage index ( Ten-min RFA (51 W) created smaller periablational zones than 10-min MWA (11.3 cm Although RFA creates smaller periablational zones than MWA, 100 W-5 min MWA provides the lowest PZ/CZ.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32996794
doi: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1823022
pmc: PMC7714001
mid: NIHMS1648247
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1131-1138Subventions
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB028848
Pays : United States
Références
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018 Feb;29(2):322-327
pubmed: 28988468
Int J Hyperthermia. 1994 Jul-Aug;10(4):457-83
pubmed: 7963805
Br J Radiol. 2015 Jun;88(1050):20140497
pubmed: 25882688
Acad Radiol. 2018 May;25(5):636-642
pubmed: 29337089
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Sep;48(6):671-681
pubmed: 30063081
Acad Radiol. 2006 Mar;13(3):343-52
pubmed: 16488847
IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 2005 Jan;53(1):215-220
pubmed: 18079981
Med Phys. 2010 Oct;37(10):5313-21
pubmed: 21089766
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2017 Nov;33(11):
pubmed: 28146314
Med Phys. 2020 Sep;47(9):3777-3788
pubmed: 32506550
Exp Ther Med. 2012 Feb;3(2):214-220
pubmed: 22969871
Oncologist. 2019 Oct;24(10):e990-e1005
pubmed: 31217342
Radiology. 2007 Mar;242(3):743-50
pubmed: 17244719
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009 Nov;32(6):1235-40
pubmed: 19488818
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011 Apr;58(4):949-59
pubmed: 21172749
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000;7(6):592-8
pubmed: 11180892
Rofo. 2017 Nov;189(11):1055-1066
pubmed: 28834968
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2019 Jul;25(4):291-297
pubmed: 31120427
Biomed Eng Online. 2004 Aug 06;3(1):27
pubmed: 15298708
Int J Hyperthermia. 2017 Feb;33(1):34-42
pubmed: 27443519
Acad Radiol. 2004 Feb;11(2):178-89
pubmed: 14974593
Open Biomed Eng J. 2010 Feb 04;4:27-38
pubmed: 20309393
Int J Hyperthermia. 2010;26(4):359-65
pubmed: 20377364
J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Oct;38(10):2611-2619
pubmed: 30697783
Med Phys. 2010 Jun;37(6):2967-73
pubmed: 20632609
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2009 May-Jun;38(3):135-43
pubmed: 19298912
Int J Hyperthermia. 2016 Dec;32(8):931-939
pubmed: 27452352
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009 Sep;20(9):1224-9
pubmed: 19616970
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013 Apr;36(2):505-11
pubmed: 22572764
Eur Radiol. 2012 Sep;22(9):1983-90
pubmed: 22544225
Gut Liver. 2015 Nov 23;9(6):784-90
pubmed: 25963083
Med Eng Phys. 2017 Aug;46:63-70
pubmed: 28647287
Int J Hyperthermia. 2020;37(1):119-129
pubmed: 31969029
Med Phys. 2014 Dec;41(12):123301
pubmed: 25471983
Radiology. 2007 Mar;242(3):914-24
pubmed: 17229876
Eur J Radiol. 2008 Aug;67(2):357-61
pubmed: 17768024
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017 Oct;40(10):1600-1608
pubmed: 28516273
Med Phys. 2015 Nov;42(11):6152-61
pubmed: 26520708
Med Phys. 1982 Sep-Oct;9(5):715-21
pubmed: 7155074
Acad Radiol. 2010 Jul;17(7):894-9
pubmed: 20540911
Radiology. 2016 Dec;281(3):782-792
pubmed: 27409564
Radiology. 2013 Aug;268(2):382-9
pubmed: 23579048