Topical lignocaine anaesthesia for oropharyngeal sampling for COVID-19.
Lignocaine
RT-PCR
SARS coronavirus
Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
received:
26
08
2020
accepted:
23
09
2020
pubmed:
2
10
2020
medline:
24
4
2021
entrez:
1
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To ascertain if topical lignocaine application in oropharynx prior to swab sampling to test for COVID-19 improves a patient's comfort and to assess its effect on the swab sample taken to conduct the RT-PCR. Adult patients testing positive on the RT-PCR COVID-19 test were sampled again within 48 h after administering topical oropharyngeal anaesthesia. Patients were asked to rate their discomfort on a visual analog scale (VAS) for both sample A and B. A qualitative real-time RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, was performed, and the cycle threshold value (Ct), used as a surrogate marker for the viral load, was measured for the sample taken without lignocaine (sample A) and the sample taken post-lignocaine application (sample B). The difference in Ct values of both the groups was checked for any statistical significance using paired t-test. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used on VAS scores to determine any significant decrease in discomfort. Forty patients were included in the study. Twenty-nine patients (72.5%) reported the procedure to be more comfortable post-lignocaine application. Median (IQR) discomfort on VAS decreased from 7 (1) to 5 (2) after lignocaine use, which was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Mean Ct value for sample A was 17.21 ± 5.25 and for sample B was 18.44 ± 4.8 (p > 0.05), indicating a non-significant effect of lignocaine on SARS-CoV-2 concentration in the sample. Topical lignocaine, while improving the comfort of the procedure of oropharyngeal sampling for patient did not alter the SARS-CoV-2 viral load that was detected in nasal and oropharyngeal samples taken together.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33001294
doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06402-z
pii: 10.1007/s00405-020-06402-z
pmc: PMC7528153
doi:
Substances chimiques
RNA, Viral
0
Lidocaine
98PI200987
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1669-1673Références
Wang W, Xu Y, Gao R et al (2020) Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical specimens. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.3786 (Published online March 11, 2020)
doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3786
pubmed: 7448831
pmcid: 7448831
van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH et al (2020) Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2004973 (Published online March 17, 2020)
doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2004973
pubmed: 32283580
pmcid: 7121658
To KK-W, Tsang OT-Y, Leung W-S et al (2020) Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: an observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 20(5):565–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30196-1
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30196-1
pubmed: 32213337
pmcid: 7158907
Saito M, Adachi E, Yamayoshi S et al (2020) Gargle lavage as a safe and sensitive alternative to swab samples to diagnose COVID-19: a case report in Japan. Clin Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa377 (Published online April 2020)
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa377
pubmed: 32986793
pmcid: 7823073
Pasomsub E, Watcharananan SP, Boonyawat K et al (2020) Saliva sample as a non-invasive specimen for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019: a cross-sectional study. Clin Microbiol Infect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.05.001 (Published online 2020)
doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.05.001
pubmed: 32422408
pmcid: 7227531
Tu Y-P, Jennings R, Hart B et al (2020) Swabs collected by patients or health care workers for SARS-CoV-2 testing. N Engl J Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2016321 (Published online June 2020)
doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2016321
pubmed: 33113307
pmcid: 7121484
Mogensen S, Treldal C, Feldager E et al (2012) New lidocaine lozenge as topical anesthesia compared to lidocaine viscous oral solution before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Local Reg Anesth 5:17–22. https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S30715
doi: 10.2147/LRA.S30715
pubmed: 22915898
pmcid: 3417978
Salale N, Treldal C, Mogensen S et al (2014) Bupivacaine lozenge compared with lidocaine spray as topical pharyngeal anesthetic before unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Med Insights Gastroenterol 7:55–59. https://doi.org/10.4137/CGast.S18019
doi: 10.4137/CGast.S18019
pubmed: 25374463
pmcid: 4213191
Wilson NM, Norton A, Young FP, Collins DW (2020) Airborne transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 to healthcare workers: a narrative review. Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15093 (Published online April 2020)
doi: 10.1111/anae.15093
pubmed: 33300132
pmcid: 7264768
Anderson EL, Turnham P, Griffin JR, Clarke CC (2020) Consideration of the aerosol transmission for COVID-19 and public health. Risk Anal 40(5):902–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13500
doi: 10.1111/risa.13500
pubmed: 32356927
pmcid: 7267124
Wang D, Hu B, Hu C et al (2020) Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan China. JAMA 323(11):1061–1069. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.1585
doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1585
pubmed: 32031570
pmcid: 32031570
Mukherjee PK, Esper F, Buchheit K et al (2017) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to assess the safety and effectiveness of a novel dual-action oral topical formulation against upper respiratory infections. BMC Infect Dis 17(1):74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-2177-8
doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-2177-8
pubmed: 28088167
pmcid: 5237564
Williams OA, Wilcox MH, Nicol CD, Spencer RC, Reilly CS (1993) Lignocaine spray applicators are a potential source of cross-infection in the anaesthetic room. Anaesthesia 48(1):61–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1993.tb06795.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1993.tb06795.x
pubmed: 8434751
Lai X, Wang M, Qin C et al (2020) Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-2019) infection among health care workers and implications for prevention measures in a tertiary hospital in Wuhan China. JAMA Netw Open 3(5):e209666–e209666. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9666
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9666
pubmed: 32437575
pmcid: 7243089