MGMT methylation may benefit overall survival in patients with moderately vascularized glioblastomas.
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
/ therapeutic use
Brain Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
DNA Methylation
DNA Modification Methylases
/ genetics
DNA Repair Enzymes
/ genetics
Glioblastoma
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Prognosis
Promoter Regions, Genetic
Temozolomide
/ therapeutic use
Tumor Suppressor Proteins
/ genetics
Glioblastoma
O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase
Perfusion imaging
Prognostic factors
Temozolomide
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
18
06
2020
accepted:
15
09
2020
revised:
05
08
2020
pubmed:
2
10
2020
medline:
15
4
2021
entrez:
1
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the combined role of tumor vascularity, estimated from perfusion MRI, and MGMT methylation status on overall survival (OS) in patients with glioblastoma. A multicentric international dataset including 96 patients from NCT03439332 clinical study were used to study the prognostic relationships between MGMT and perfusion markers. Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) in the most vascularized tumor regions was automatically obtained from preoperative MRIs using ONCOhabitats online analysis service. Cox survival regression models and stratification strategies were conducted to define a subpopulation that is particularly favored by MGMT methylation in terms of OS. rCBV distributions did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) in the methylated and the non-methylated subpopulations. In patients with moderately vascularized tumors (rCBV < 10.73), MGMT methylation was a positive predictive factor for OS (HR = 2.73, p = 0.003, AUC = 0.70). In patients with highly vascularized tumors (rCBV > 10.73), however, there was no significant effect of MGMT methylation (HR = 1.72, p = 0.10, AUC = 0.56). Our results indicate the existence of complementary prognostic information provided by MGMT methylation and rCBV. Perfusion markers could identify a subpopulation of patients who will benefit the most from MGMT methylation. Not considering this information may lead to bias in the interpretation of clinical studies. • MRI perfusion provides complementary prognostic information to MGMT methylation. • MGMT methylation improves prognosis in glioblastoma patients with moderate vascular profile. • Failure to consider these relations may lead to bias in the interpretation of clinical studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33001310
doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07297-4
pii: 10.1007/s00330-020-07297-4
pmc: PMC7880975
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
0
Tumor Suppressor Proteins
0
DNA Modification Methylases
EC 2.1.1.-
MGMT protein, human
EC 2.1.1.63
DNA Repair Enzymes
EC 6.5.1.-
Temozolomide
YF1K15M17Y
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1738-1747Subventions
Organisme : Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación
ID : DPI2016-80054-R
Organisme : H2020 Health
ID : 727560
Organisme : H2020 Health
ID : 825750
Organisme : H2020 European Research Council
ID : 758657
Organisme : Helse Sør-Øst RHF
ID : 2017073
Organisme : Helse Sør-Øst RHF
ID : 2013069
Organisme : Programa Estatal de Promoción del Talento y su Empleabilidad en I+D+I
ID : DPI2016-80054-R
Organisme : H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
ID : 844646
Références
Radiology. 2018 Jun;287(3):944-954
pubmed: 29357274
MAGMA. 2010 Feb;23(1):1-21
pubmed: 19960361
Neuro Oncol. 2010 Aug;12(8):822-33
pubmed: 20179017
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):997-1003
pubmed: 15758010
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Jan;31(1):192-203
pubmed: 20027588
Sci Data. 2017 Sep 05;4:170117
pubmed: 28872634
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Oct;34(10):1993-2024
pubmed: 25494501
Neuro Oncol. 2014 Sep;16(9):1263-73
pubmed: 24510240
Eur Radiol. 2018 May;28(5):2115-2123
pubmed: 29234914
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 31;359(5):492-507
pubmed: 18669428
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):803-20
pubmed: 27157931
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):243-9
pubmed: 11994756
Eur Radiol. 2018 Sep;28(9):3640-3650
pubmed: 29564594
Lancet Oncol. 2008 Jan;9(1):29-38
pubmed: 18082451
NMR Biomed. 2018 Dec;31(12):e4006
pubmed: 30239058
World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec 27;:
pubmed: 30593971
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Aug;128:53-61
pubmed: 31160012
CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 May-Jun;60(3):166-93
pubmed: 20445000
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 19;110(47):19059-64
pubmed: 24190997
Oncol Lett. 2017 Jul;14(1):229-233
pubmed: 28693158
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Nov 6;19(suppl_5):v1-v88
pubmed: 29117289
Surg Neurol. 2009 Sep;72(3):242-6; discussion 246-7
pubmed: 19329156
Clin Neuroradiol. 2019 Sep;29(3):479-491
pubmed: 29468261
Stat Med. 1996 Feb 28;15(4):361-87
pubmed: 8668867
Eur Radiol. 2020 Feb;30(2):1202-1211
pubmed: 31468161
Lancet Oncol. 2009 May;10(5):459-66
pubmed: 19269895
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 29;7(1):9746
pubmed: 28851989
Nat Med. 2013 Sep;19(9):1178-83
pubmed: 23955713
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Jun;29(6):1310-20
pubmed: 20378467
Neuroradiology. 2016 Dec;58(12):1197-1208
pubmed: 27796446
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Apr;27(4):859-67
pubmed: 16611779
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jun;30(6):3254-3265
pubmed: 32078014
Neurol Res. 2008 Jul;30(6):567-70
pubmed: 18647495
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2033-44
pubmed: 20851191
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 May;51(5):1478-1486
pubmed: 31654541
Neuroradiology. 2012 Jun;54(6):555-63
pubmed: 21833736
Neuro Oncol. 2010 Feb;12(2):116-21
pubmed: 20150378
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Mar 1;19(3):394-404
pubmed: 27571882