The impact of automated medicine dispensing units on nursing workflow: A cross-sectional study.

Automated dispensing cabinets Automated dispensing machine Automated dispensing unit Drug administration Hospital medication systems Nurses/midwives/nursing staff Patient safety Pharmacy workflow

Journal

International journal of nursing studies
ISSN: 1873-491X
Titre abrégé: Int J Nurs Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0400675

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 17 04 2020
revised: 31 08 2020
accepted: 07 09 2020
pubmed: 2 10 2020
medline: 29 7 2021
entrez: 1 10 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Automated medication dispensing cabinets are ubiquitous in hospitals in the United States and prevalent in Canada, but they are still relatively new to health services elsewhere. The automation of medication management using distributed dispensing units is aimed at improving stock management and patient safety; however, the evidence for the latter remains equivocal, and the impact on nursing workflow is poorly understood. This study evaluated the impact on the nursing workflow of a distributed automated medication dispensing system. The research aimed to explore the acceptability and utility of this system in a variety of clinical settings and to investigate similarities and differences in the use of the dispensing cabinets across different clinical areas. A cross-sectional design was employed. The setting was a newly constructed 450-bed regional Australian tertiary hospital. The study involved 174 registered nurses and 12 pharmacy assistant staff from general ward and specialty areas who were using the automated medication dispensing cabinets. Methods included a hospital-wide survey of users and an observation study of nursing workflow around the automated medication cabinets in specific clinical areas. The majority of staff were satisfied with the system and were positive about the overall safety and security. Key concerns related to access delays, and increased time needed due to walking distance and interruptions from other staff. Staff perceived that the automated medication dispensing cabinet use slowed medication administration processes as a result of queueing, and it also had other impacts on workflow. The system was found to expedite processes around controlled/narcotic drug administration. Re-stocking requirements presented operational issues; pharmacy assistants were observed waiting for opportunities to complete re-stocking tasks in the face of competing clinical requirements. Nurses from general wards were more satisfied with the system than those from specialty areas. Automated medication dispensing cabinets were widely accepted by nurses in a large newly opened hospital in a variety of acute clinical areas despite disruptions to workflow. Adaptations for access were more acceptable to nurses in general wards than those in specialty areas prompting consideration of redesign to improve suitability. Tweetable abstract: Automated medication cabinets change nursing workflow because of queueing, interruptions from other staff and increased walking. Ward nurses are more accepting of such workflow disruptions than speciality area nurses #medicationsafety #nurseworkflow #nursesatisfaction (268 char).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Automated medication dispensing cabinets are ubiquitous in hospitals in the United States and prevalent in Canada, but they are still relatively new to health services elsewhere. The automation of medication management using distributed dispensing units is aimed at improving stock management and patient safety; however, the evidence for the latter remains equivocal, and the impact on nursing workflow is poorly understood.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study evaluated the impact on the nursing workflow of a distributed automated medication dispensing system. The research aimed to explore the acceptability and utility of this system in a variety of clinical settings and to investigate similarities and differences in the use of the dispensing cabinets across different clinical areas.
DESIGN METHODS
A cross-sectional design was employed.
SETTING METHODS
The setting was a newly constructed 450-bed regional Australian tertiary hospital.
PARTICIPANTS METHODS
The study involved 174 registered nurses and 12 pharmacy assistant staff from general ward and specialty areas who were using the automated medication dispensing cabinets.
METHODS METHODS
Methods included a hospital-wide survey of users and an observation study of nursing workflow around the automated medication cabinets in specific clinical areas.
RESULTS RESULTS
The majority of staff were satisfied with the system and were positive about the overall safety and security. Key concerns related to access delays, and increased time needed due to walking distance and interruptions from other staff. Staff perceived that the automated medication dispensing cabinet use slowed medication administration processes as a result of queueing, and it also had other impacts on workflow. The system was found to expedite processes around controlled/narcotic drug administration. Re-stocking requirements presented operational issues; pharmacy assistants were observed waiting for opportunities to complete re-stocking tasks in the face of competing clinical requirements. Nurses from general wards were more satisfied with the system than those from specialty areas.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Automated medication dispensing cabinets were widely accepted by nurses in a large newly opened hospital in a variety of acute clinical areas despite disruptions to workflow. Adaptations for access were more acceptable to nurses in general wards than those in specialty areas prompting consideration of redesign to improve suitability. Tweetable abstract: Automated medication cabinets change nursing workflow because of queueing, interruptions from other staff and increased walking. Ward nurses are more accepting of such workflow disruptions than speciality area nurses #medicationsafety #nurseworkflow #nursesatisfaction (268 char).

Identifiants

pubmed: 33002837
pii: S0020-7489(20)30259-5
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103773
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Pharmaceutical Preparations 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103773

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Auteurs

Alison Craswell (A)

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, USC, Locked Bag 4, Maroochydore DC, QLD 4558, Australia. Electronic address: acraswell@usc.edu.au.

Kate Bennett (K)

Sunshine Coast University Hospital, PO Box 5340, Sunshine Coast MC, QLD 4560, Australia.

Brett Dalgliesh (B)

Sunshine Coast University Hospital, PO Box 5340, Sunshine Coast MC, QLD 4560, Australia.

Bernadette Morris-Smith (B)

Health Innovation, Investment and Research Office, GPO Box 48, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia.

Julie Hanson (J)

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, USC, Locked Bag 4, Maroochydore DC, QLD 4558, Australia.

Trudi Flynn (T)

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, USC, Locked Bag 4, Maroochydore DC, QLD 4558, Australia.

Marianne Wallis (M)

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, USC, Locked Bag 4, Maroochydore DC, QLD 4558, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH