Automated Annotation of Sphingolipids Including Accurate Identification of Hydroxylation Sites Using MS
Animals
Binding Sites
Brain
/ metabolism
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
Fatty Acids
/ chemistry
High-Throughput Screening Assays
Humans
Hydroxylation
Medical Records Systems, Computerized
/ instrumentation
Mice
Models, Chemical
Plasma
/ metabolism
Reproducibility of Results
Sphingolipids
/ analysis
Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Journal
Analytical chemistry
ISSN: 1520-6882
Titre abrégé: Anal Chem
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370536
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 10 2020
20 10 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
3
10
2020
medline:
4
3
2021
entrez:
2
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Sphingolipids constitute a heterogeneous lipid category that is involved in many key cellular functions. For high-throughput analyses of sphingolipids, tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is the method of choice, offering sufficient sensitivity, structural information, and quantitative precision for detecting hundreds to thousands of species simultaneously. While glycerolipids and phospholipids are predominantly non-hydroxylated, sphingolipids are typically dihydroxylated. However, species containing one or three hydroxylation sites can be detected frequently. This variability in the number of hydroxylation sites on the sphingolipid long-chain base and the fatty acyl moiety produces many more isobaric species and fragments than for other lipid categories. Due to this complexity, the automated annotation of sphingolipid species is challenging, and incorrect annotations are common. In this study, we present an extension of the Lipid Data Analyzer (LDA) "decision rule set" concept that considers the structural characteristics that are specific for this lipid category. To address the challenges inherent to automated annotation of sphingolipid structures from MS/MS data, we first developed decision rule sets using spectra from authentic standards and then tested the applicability on biological samples including murine brain and human plasma. A benchmark test based on the murine brain samples revealed a highly improved annotation quality as measured by sensitivity and reliability. The results of this benchmark test combined with the easy extensibility of the software to other (sphingo)lipid classes and the capability to detect and correctly annotate novel sphingolipid species make LDA broadly applicable to automated sphingolipid analysis, especially in high-throughput settings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33003696
doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c03016
pmc: PMC7581017
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fatty Acids
0
Sphingolipids
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
14054-14062Subventions
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : P30 DK063491
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK105961
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM020501
Pays : United States
Références
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011 Nov;1811(11):838-53
pubmed: 21749933
Nat Biotechnol. 2012 Oct;30(10):918-20
pubmed: 23051804
J Lipid Res. 2013 Jun;54(6):1523-30
pubmed: 23549332
Anal Chem. 2017 Sep 5;89(17):8800-8807
pubmed: 28753264
Nat Methods. 2013 Aug;10(8):755-8
pubmed: 23817071
Nat Methods. 2017 Dec;14(12):1171-1174
pubmed: 29058722
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008 Feb;9(2):139-50
pubmed: 18216770
Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Nov;22(11):1459-66
pubmed: 15529173
Nat Biotechnol. 2020 Oct;38(10):1159-1163
pubmed: 32541957
Metabolites. 2020 Mar 12;10(3):
pubmed: 32178227
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018 Mar;19(3):175-191
pubmed: 29165427
Anal Chem. 2019 Mar 5;91(5):3302-3310
pubmed: 30688441
Chem Rev. 2011 Oct 12;111(10):6387-422
pubmed: 21942574
PLoS One. 2013 May 07;8(5):e61951
pubmed: 23667450
J Lipid Res. 2008 May;49(5):1137-46
pubmed: 18281723
Bioinformatics. 2011 Feb 15;27(4):572-7
pubmed: 21169379
J Biol Chem. 2015 Feb 27;290(9):5810-25
pubmed: 25575593
Methods Enzymol. 2005;405:300-69
pubmed: 16413319
J Chromatogr A. 2010 Jun 18;1217(25):4229-39
pubmed: 20452604
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;688:249-63
pubmed: 20919660
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D608-D617
pubmed: 29140435
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(Database issue):D815-20
pubmed: 22064855
Bioinformatics. 2017 Jun 1;33(11):1744-1746
pubmed: 28158427
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2017 May 15;1053:72-80
pubmed: 28415015
Cell Syst. 2018 May 23;6(5):621-625.e5
pubmed: 29705063
Physiol Rev. 2001 Oct;81(4):1689-723
pubmed: 11581500
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000 Jun 26;1486(1):145-70
pubmed: 10856719
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jan;35(Database issue):D527-32
pubmed: 17098933
Eur J Biochem. 2001 Mar;268(5):1190-205
pubmed: 11231270
Anal Chem. 2019 Oct 15;91(20):12615-12618
pubmed: 31525911
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jan;36(Database issue):D344-50
pubmed: 17932057
BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Jul 10;18(1):331
pubmed: 28693421
J Lipid Res. 2011 Dec;52(12):2314-22
pubmed: 21960706
Bioinformatics. 2015 Sep 1;31(17):2860-6
pubmed: 25943471
Nature. 1997 Jun 5;387(6633):569-72
pubmed: 9177342