Risk of complicated birth at term in nulliparous and multiparous women using routinely collected maternity data in England: cohort study.


Journal

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
ISSN: 1756-1833
Titre abrégé: BMJ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8900488

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 10 2020
Historique:
entrez: 2 10 2020
pubmed: 3 10 2020
medline: 22 10 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To determine the rate of complicated birth at term in women classified at low risk according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline for intrapartum care (no pre-existing medical conditions, important obstetric history, or complications during pregnancy) and to assess if the risk classification can be improved by considering parity and the number of risk factors. Cohort study using linked electronic maternity records. 276 766 women with a singleton birth at term after a trial of labour in 87 NHS hospital trusts in England between April 2015 and March 2016. A composite outcome of complicated birth, defined as a birth with use of an instrument, caesarean delivery, anal sphincter injury, postpartum haemorrhage, or Apgar score of 7 or less at five minutes. Multiparous women without a history of caesarean section had the lowest rates of complicated birth, varying from 8.8% (4879 of 55 426 women, 95% confidence interval 8.6% to 9.0%) in those without specific risk factors to 21.8% (613 of 2811 women, 20.2% to 23.4%) in those with three or more. The rate of complicated birth was higher in nulliparous women, with corresponding rates varying from 43.4% (25  805 of 59 413 women, 43.0% to 43.8%) to 64.3% (364 of 566 women, 60.3% to 68.3%); and highest in multiparous women with previous caesarean section, with corresponding rates varying from 42.9% (3426 of 7993 women, 41.8% to 44.0%) to 66.3% (554 of 836 women, 63.0% to 69.5%). Nulliparous women without risk factors have substantially higher rates of complicated birth than multiparous women without a previous caesarean section even if the latter have multiple risk factors. Grouping women first according to parity and previous mode of birth, and then within these groups according to presence of specific risk factors would provide greater and more informed choice to women, better targeting of interventions, and fewer transfers during labour than according to the presence of risk factors alone.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33004347
doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3377
pmc: PMC7527835
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

m3377

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: all individuals are or have been partially or wholly funded by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership for their contribution to the submitted work. DP is also funded by Tommy’s Charity. All authors also declare no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years. Dr Hawdon reports personal fees from expert medicolegal reporting, for defendant and claimant, on perinatal injury cases. The authors report no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Références

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Feb 06;14:60
pubmed: 24499396
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Oct 17;19(1):360
pubmed: 31623587
Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Oct 25;8:595-599
pubmed: 27822105
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2012 Dec;3(4):147-53
pubmed: 23182447
BMJ. 2018 Feb 7;360:k207
pubmed: 29437691
BMJ. 2011 Nov 23;343:d7400
pubmed: 22117057
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018 Mar;15:10-17
pubmed: 29389494
BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(2):183-92
pubmed: 24251861
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Aug;118(2 Pt 1):201-208
pubmed: 21734618
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Apr;109(4):806-12
pubmed: 17400840
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 16;(7):CD000934
pubmed: 26184394
JAMA. 2002 May 22-29;287(20):2684-90
pubmed: 12020304
Midwifery. 2018 Jul;62:240-255
pubmed: 29727829
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;212(6):809.e1-6
pubmed: 26042957
BJOG. 2009 Aug;116(9):1177-84
pubmed: 19624439
Lancet. 2014 Nov 15;384(9956):1749-55
pubmed: 25236409
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152779
pubmed: 27031516
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008 Mar;93(2):F115-20
pubmed: 17916594
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Mar 21;17(1):95
pubmed: 28320352
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 27;12(7):e0180846
pubmed: 28749944
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 May;67(5):578-85
pubmed: 24411310

Auteurs

Jennifer Jardine (J)

Department of Health Service Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK jennifer.jardine@lshtm.ac.uk.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK.

Andrea Blotkamp (A)

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK.

Ipek Gurol-Urganci (I)

Department of Health Service Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK.

Hannah Knight (H)

Department of Health Service Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK.

Tina Harris (T)

Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.

Jane Hawdon (J)

Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Jan van der Meulen (J)

Department of Health Service Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK.

Kate Walker (K)

Department of Health Service Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.

Dharmintra Pasupathy (D)

Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's Health Partners, King's College, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH