Crawl positioning improves set-up precision and patient comfort in prone whole breast irradiation.
Breast
/ radiation effects
Breast Neoplasms
/ radiotherapy
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
/ methods
Female
Humans
Patient Comfort
/ methods
Patient Positioning
/ methods
Prone Position
/ physiology
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Supine Position
/ physiology
Unilateral Breast Neoplasms
/ radiotherapy
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 10 2020
02 10 2020
Historique:
received:
12
11
2019
accepted:
06
09
2020
entrez:
3
10
2020
pubmed:
4
10
2020
medline:
5
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Prone positioning for whole-breast irradiation (WBI) reduces dose to organs at risk, but reduces set-up speed, precision, and comfort. We aimed to improve these problems by placing patients in prone crawl position on a newly developed crawl couch (CrC). A group of 10 right-sided breast cancer patients requiring WBI were randomized in this cross-over trial, comparing the CrC to a standard prone breastboard (BB). Laterolateral (LL), craniocaudal (CC) and anterioposterior (AP) set-up errors were evaluated with cone beam CT. Comfort, preference and set-up time (SUT) were assessed. Forty left and right-sided breast cancer patients served as a validation group. For BB versus CrC, AP, LL and CC mean patient shifts were - 0.8 ± 2.8, 0.2 ± 11.7 and - 0.6 ± 4.4 versus - 0.2 ± 3.3, - 0.8 ± 2.5 and - 1.9 ± 5.7 mm. LL shift spread was reduced significantly. Nine out of 10 patients preferred the CrC. SUT did not differ significantly. The validation group had mean patient shifts of 1.7 ± 2.9 (AP), 0.2 ± 3.6 (LL) and - 0.2 ± 3.3 (CC) mm. Mean SUT in the validation group was 1 min longer (P < 0.05) than the comparative group. Median SUT was 3 min in all groups. The CrC improved precision and comfort compared to BB. Set-up errors compare favourably to other prone-WBI trials and rival supine positioning.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33009448
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72702-3
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-72702-3
pmc: PMC7532156
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
16376Subventions
Organisme : Susan G. Komen
ID : 377841
Pays : United States
Références
1Ferlay J et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11, https://globocan.iarc.fr (2013).
Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group et al. Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet 378, 1707–1716 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61629-2 (2011).
Berrington de Gonzalez, A. et al. Second solid cancers after radiotherapy for breast cancer in SEER cancer registries. Br. J. Cancer 102, 220–226. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605435 (2010).
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605435
pubmed: 19935795
Darby, S. C., McGale, P., Taylor, C. W. & Peto, R. Long-term mortality from heart disease and lung cancer after radiotherapy for early breast cancer: prospective cohort study of about 300,000 women in US SEER cancer registries. Lancet Oncol. 6, 557–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70251-5 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70251-5
pubmed: 16054566
Darby, S. C. et al. Risk of ischemic heart disease in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 987–998. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1209825 (2013).
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209825
pubmed: 23484825
Marks, L. B. et al. Radiation dose-volume effects in the lung. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 76, S70–S76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.091 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.091
pubmed: 20171521
pmcid: 3576042
Vogelius, I. R., Bentzen, S. M., Maraldo, M. V., Petersen, P. M. & Specht, L. Risk factors for radiation-induced hypothyroidism: a literature-based meta-analysis. Cancer 117, 5250–5260. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26186 (2011).
doi: 10.1002/cncr.26186
pubmed: 21567385
Taylor, C. W. et al. Cardiac doses from Swedish breast cancer radiotherapy since the 1950s. Radiother. Oncol. 90, 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2008.09.029 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.09.029
pubmed: 19008005
Viren, T. et al. Tangential volumetric modulated arc therapy technique for left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy. Radiat. Oncol. 10, 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0392-x (2015).
doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0392-x
pubmed: 25888866
pmcid: 4404692
Mulliez, T. et al. Whole breast radiotherapy in prone and supine position: is there a place for multi-beam IMRT?. Radiat. Oncol. 8, 151. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-151 (2013).
doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-151
pubmed: 23800109
pmcid: 3702403
Bartlett, F. R. et al. The UK HeartSpare Study (Stage II): multicentre evaluation of a voluntary breath-hold technique in patients receiving breast radiotherapy. Clin. Oncol. (R. Coll. Radiol.) 29, e51–e56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2016.11.005 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2016.11.005
Mulliez, T. et al. Deep inspiration breath hold in the prone position retracts the heart from the breast and internal mammary lymph node region. Radiother. Oncol. 117, 473–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2015.09.030 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.09.030
pubmed: 26455452
Morrow, N. V., Stepaniak, C., White, J., Wilson, J. F. & Li, X. A. Intra- and interfractional variations for prone breast irradiation: an indication for image-guided radiotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 69, 910–917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.056 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.056
pubmed: 17889272
Kirby, A. M. et al. A randomised trial of supine versus prone breast radiotherapy (SuPr study): comparing set-up errors and respiratory motion. Radiother. Oncol. 100, 221–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2010.11.005 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.11.005
pubmed: 21159397
Veldeman, L. et al. Alternated prone and supine whole-breast irradiation using IMRT: setup precision, respiratory movement and treatment time. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 82, 2055–2064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.070 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.070
pubmed: 21570208
Lymberis, S. C. et al. Prospective assessment of optimal individual position (prone versus supine) for breast radiotherapy: volumetric and dosimetric correlations in 100 patients. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 84, 902–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.040 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.040
pubmed: 22494590
Formenti, S. C., DeWyngaert, J. K., Jozsef, G. & Goldberg, J. D. Prone vs supine positioning for breast cancer radiotherapy. JAMA 308, 861–863. https://doi.org/10.1001/2012.jama.10759 (2012).
doi: 10.1001/2012.jama.10759
pubmed: 22948692
Mulliez, T. et al. Setup accuracy for prone and supine whole breast irradiation. Strahlenther. Onkol. 192, 254–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-016-0943-6 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s00066-016-0943-6
pubmed: 26864048
Boute, B. et al. Potential benefits of crawl position for prone radiation therapy in breast cancer. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 18, 200–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12118 (2017).
doi: 10.1002/acm2.12118
pubmed: 28649708
pmcid: 5874953
Speleers, B. A. et al. Comparison of supine or prone crawl photon or proton breast and regional lymph node radiation therapy including the internal mammary chain. Sci. Rep. 9, 4755. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41283-1 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41283-1
pubmed: 30894606
pmcid: 6427000
Deseyne, P. et al. Whole breast and regional nodal irradiation in prone versus supine position in left sided breast cancer. Radiat. Oncol. 12, 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0828-6 (2017).
doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0828-6
pubmed: 28549483
pmcid: 5446717
Veldeman, L. et al. Preliminary results on setup precision of prone-lateral patient positioning for whole breast irradiation. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 78, 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1749 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1749
pubmed: 20137868
Mulliez, T. et al. Hypofractionated whole breast irradiation for patients with large breasts: a randomized trial comparing prone and supine positions. Radiother. Oncol. 108, 203–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2013.08.040 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.08.040
pubmed: 24044803
Boute, B. et al. The relation between patient discomfort and uncompensated forces of a patient support device for breast and regional lymph node radiotherapy. Appl. Ergon. 72, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.05.002 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.05.002
pubmed: 29885727
van Herk, M. Errors and margins in radiotherapy. Semin. Radiat. Oncol. 14, 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semradonc.2003.10.003 (2004).
doi: 10.1053/j.semradonc.2003.10.003
pubmed: 14752733
Varga, Z. et al. Individual positioning: a comparative study of adjuvant breast radiotherapy in the prone versus supine position. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 75, 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.045 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.045
Mitchell, J., Formenti, S. C. & DeWyngaert, J. K. Interfraction and intrafraction setup variability for prone breast radiation therapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 76, 1571–1577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1683 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1683
pubmed: 19910134
Jozsef, G., DeWyngaert, J. K., Becker, S. J., Lymberis, S. & Formenti, S. C. Prospective study of cone-beam computed tomography image-guided radiotherapy for prone accelerated partial breast irradiation. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 81, 568–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.029 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.029
pubmed: 21570210
Ahunbay, E. E. et al. Interfractional target variations for partial breast irradiation. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 82, 1594–1604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.041 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.041
pubmed: 21570200
Lakosi, F. et al. Feasibility evaluation of prone breast irradiation with the Sagittilt((c)) system including residual-intrafractional error assessment. Cancer Radiother. 20, 776–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canrad.2016.05.014 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2016.05.014
pubmed: 27396903
de Boer, H. C. J. & Heijmen, B. J. M. eNAL: an extension of the NAL setup correction protocol for effective use of weekly follow-up measurements. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 67, 1586–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.11.050 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.11.050
Cai, G. et al. Impact of residual and intrafractional errors on strategy of correction for image-guided accelerated partial breast irradiation. Radiat. Oncol. 5, 96. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-5-96 (2010).
doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-96
pubmed: 20977723
pmcid: 2987941
Donovan, E. M., Castellano, I., Eagle, S. & Harris, E. Clinical implementation of kilovoltage cone beam CT for the verification of sequential and integrated photon boost treatments for breast cancer patients. Br. J. Radiol. 85, e1051–e1057. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/28845176 (2012).
doi: 10.1259/bjr/28845176
pubmed: 22553296
pmcid: 3477491
Hasan, Y. et al. Comparison of planned versus actual dose delivered for external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation using cone-beam CT and deformable registration. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 80, 1473–1476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.04.013 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.04.013
pubmed: 20656415
Penninkhof, J., Quint, S., Baaijens, M., Heijmen, B. & Dirkx, M. Practical use of the extended no action level (eNAL) correction protocol for breast cancer patients with implanted surgical clips. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 82, 1031–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.059 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.059
pubmed: 21420248
Shah, A. P., Dvorak, T., Curry, M. S., Buchholz, D. J. & Meeks, S. L. Clinical evaluation of interfractional variations for whole breast radiotherapy using 3-dimensional surface imaging. Pract. Radiat. Oncol. 3, 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2012.03.002 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2012.03.002
pubmed: 24674259
Topolnjak, R. et al. Image-guided radiotherapy for breast cancer patients: surgical clips as surrogate for breast excision cavity. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 81, e187–e195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.027 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.027
pubmed: 21345615
van Mourik, A. et al. Effects of setup errors and shape changes on breast radiotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 79, 1557–1564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.032 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.032
White, E. A. et al. Cone beam computed tomography guidance for setup of patients receiving accelerated partial breast irradiation. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 68, 547–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.048 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.048
Cravo Sa, A. et al. Radiotherapy setup displacements in breast cancer patients: 3D surface imaging experience. Rep. Pract. Oncol. Radiother. 23, 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpor.2017.12.007 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2017.12.007
pubmed: 29379398
pmcid: 5773710