Clinical Utility of Lipoprotein(a) and LPA Genetic Risk Score in Risk Prediction of Incident Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.
Journal
JAMA cardiology
ISSN: 2380-6591
Titre abrégé: JAMA Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101676033
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Oct 2020
06 Oct 2020
Historique:
entrez:
6
10
2020
pubmed:
7
10
2020
medline:
7
10
2020
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Lipoprotein(a) is a highly heritable biomarker independently associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). It is unclear whether measured lipoprotein(a) or genetic factors associated with lipoprotein(a) can provide comparable or additional prognostic information for primary prevention. To determine whether a genetic risk score (GRS) comprising 43 variants at the LPA gene, which encodes apolipoprotein(a), has clinical utility in assessing ASCVD risk compared with and in addition to lipoprotein(a) measurement. The UK Biobank is a prospective observational study of approximately 500 000 volunteers aged 40 to 69 years who were recruited from 22 sites across the United Kingdom between 2006 and 2010. Using externally derived weights, an LPA GRS was calculated for 374 099 unrelated individuals with array-derived genotypes and lipoprotein(a) measures. Data were analyzed from April 2020 to March 2020. Measured lipoprotein(a) and LPA GRS. We estimated the associations between measured lipoprotein(a) and LPA GRS with the incidence of ASCVD (peripheral arterial disease, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and cardiovascular mortality) using Cox proportional hazards models. To determine the utility of using measured lipoprotein(a) and LPA GRS as risk enhancers for ASCVD, we assessed the potential improvement in ASCVD risk discrimination by QRISK3 and Pooled Cohort Equations among individuals with borderline to intermediate risk (n = 113 703 and 144 350, respectively). The mean age of the overall study population was 57.6 years, and 204 355 individuals were female (54.6%). During a median follow-up of 11.1 years (interquartile range, 1.4 years), 15 444 individuals developed an incident ASCVD event (5.1%). The LPA GRS explained approximately 60% of the variation in measured lipoprotein(a) for White/European individuals. Independently, both lipoprotein(a) and LPA GRS were associated with incident, composite ASCVD (hazard ratio per 120 nmol/L increase, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.23-1.28 vs hazard ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.26-1.33; P < .001). The association between LPA GRS and ASCVD was substantially attenuated after adjusting for measured lipoprotein(a). Adding measured lipoprotein(a) or LPA GRS to QRISK3 provided modest improvements to the risk discrimination of incident ASCVD events (area under the receiver operating curve, 0.640; 95% CI, 0.633-0.647 vs 0.642; 95% CI, 0.635-0.649 for both; P = .005 and P = .01, respectively). When indicated, cardiovascular risk assessment with lipoprotein(a) at middle-age may include direct measurement or an LPA GRS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33021622
pii: 2771455
doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.5398
pmc: PMC7539232
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_17228
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_QA137853
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Circulation. 2016 Aug 23;134(8):611-24
pubmed: 27496857
JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2499-506
pubmed: 22797450
JAMA. 2006 Sep 20;296(11):1363-70
pubmed: 16985228
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jun 2;75(21):2682-2693
pubmed: 32466883
BMJ. 2007 Jul 21;335(7611):136
pubmed: 17615182
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;3(7):619-627
pubmed: 29926099
Nat Commun. 2018 Jul 4;9(1):2606
pubmed: 29973585
Nat Genet. 2017 Sep;49(9):1392-1397
pubmed: 28714974
JAMA. 2009 Jul 22;302(4):412-23
pubmed: 19622820
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jun 25;73(24):e285-e350
pubmed: 30423393
Circulation. 2019 Mar 19;139(12):1472-1482
pubmed: 30667276
Lancet. 2016 Nov 5;388(10057):2239-2253
pubmed: 27665230
Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010 Feb;3(1):39-46
pubmed: 20160194
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Jul;5(7):524-533
pubmed: 28408323
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Mar 21;69(11):1513-1515
pubmed: 28302296
Circulation. 2019 Sep 10;140(11):e596-e646
pubmed: 30879355
Circulation. 2010 Apr 20;121(15):1768-77
pubmed: 20404268
Eur Heart J. 2010 Dec;31(23):2844-53
pubmed: 20965889
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Sep 2;64(9):851-60
pubmed: 25169167
JAMA. 1982 May 14;247(18):2543-6
pubmed: 7069920
Clin Biochem. 2008 May;41(7-8):453-8
pubmed: 18280807
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Feb 14;69(6):692-711
pubmed: 28183512
Circulation. 2020 Jun 2;141(22):1826-1828
pubmed: 32479194
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 17;12:77
pubmed: 21414208
J Clin Invest. 1992 Jul;90(1):52-60
pubmed: 1386087
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 30;10(3):e0121582
pubmed: 25822457
Circulation. 2012 Jan 17;125(2):241-9
pubmed: 22128224
Circulation. 1993 Apr;87(4):1135-41
pubmed: 8462142
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7726):203-209
pubmed: 30305743
J Lipid Res. 2016 Apr;57(4):697-705
pubmed: 26828068
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt B):2935-2959
pubmed: 24239921
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Dec 17;74(24):2982-2994
pubmed: 31865966
JAMA. 2009 Jun 10;301(22):2331-9
pubmed: 19509380
Int J Cardiol. 1996 Dec 13;57(3):265-70
pubmed: 9024915
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 1;41(1):111-188
pubmed: 31504418
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012 Jul;32(7):1550-1
pubmed: 22699275
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Mar 19;61(11):1146-56
pubmed: 23375930
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Jul;4(7):577-87
pubmed: 27185354
N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 24;361(26):2518-28
pubmed: 20032323
Nat Commun. 2018 Aug 23;9(1):3391
pubmed: 30140000
Circulation. 2017 Jan 17;135(3):251-263
pubmed: 27831500
Circulation. 2014 Feb 11;129(6):635-42
pubmed: 24243886
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 16;382(3):244-255
pubmed: 31893580
Lancet. 2015 Oct 10;386(10002):1472-83
pubmed: 26210642
Atherosclerosis. 2015 Oct;242(2):521-8
pubmed: 26302166