Prior treatment status: impact on the efficacy and safety of teriflunomide in multiple sclerosis.


Journal

BMC neurology
ISSN: 1471-2377
Titre abrégé: BMC Neurol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968555

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Oct 2020
Historique:
received: 08 04 2020
accepted: 23 09 2020
entrez: 7 10 2020
pubmed: 8 10 2020
medline: 6 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In this pooled, post hoc analysis of a phase 2 trial and the phase 3 TEMSO, TOWER, and TENERE clinical trials, long-term efficacy and safety of teriflunomide were assessed in subgroups of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) defined by prior treatment status. Patients were classified according to their prior treatment status in the core and core plus extension periods. In the core period, patients were grouped according to treatment status at the start of the study: treatment naive (no prior disease-modifying therapy [DMT] or DMT > 2 years prior to randomization), previously treated with another DMT (DMT > 6 to ≤24 months prior to randomization), and recently treated with another DMT (DMT ≤6 months prior to randomization). In the core plus extension period, patients were re-baselined to the time of starting teriflunomide 14 mg and grouped according to prior treatment status at that time point. Efficacy endpoints included annualized relapse rate (ARR), probability of confirmed disability worsening (CDW) over 12 weeks, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score. The incidence of adverse events was also assessed. Most frequently received prior DMTs at baseline were glatiramer acetate and interferon beta-1a across treatment groups. Teriflunomide 14 mg significantly reduced ARR versus placebo in the core period, regardless of prior treatment status. In the core and extension periods, adjusted ARRs were low (0.193-0.284) in patients treated with teriflunomide 14 mg across all subgroups. Probability of CDW by Year 4 was similar across subgroups; by Year 5, the percentage of patients with 12-week CDW was similar in treatment-naive patients and patients recently treated with another DMT (33.9 and 33.7%, respectively). EDSS scores were stable over time in all prior-treatment subgroups. There were no new or unexpected safety signals. Limitations include selective bias due to patient attrition, variability in subgroup size, and lack of magnetic resonance imaging outcomes. The efficacy and safety of teriflunomide 14 mg was similar in all patients with relapsing MS, regardless of prior treatment history. Phase 2 trial core: NCT01487096 ; Phase 2 trial extension: NCT00228163 ; TEMSO core: NCT00134563 ; TEMSO extension: NCT00803049 ; TOWER: NCT00751881 ; TENERE: NCT00883337 .

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In this pooled, post hoc analysis of a phase 2 trial and the phase 3 TEMSO, TOWER, and TENERE clinical trials, long-term efficacy and safety of teriflunomide were assessed in subgroups of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) defined by prior treatment status.
METHODS METHODS
Patients were classified according to their prior treatment status in the core and core plus extension periods. In the core period, patients were grouped according to treatment status at the start of the study: treatment naive (no prior disease-modifying therapy [DMT] or DMT > 2 years prior to randomization), previously treated with another DMT (DMT > 6 to ≤24 months prior to randomization), and recently treated with another DMT (DMT ≤6 months prior to randomization). In the core plus extension period, patients were re-baselined to the time of starting teriflunomide 14 mg and grouped according to prior treatment status at that time point. Efficacy endpoints included annualized relapse rate (ARR), probability of confirmed disability worsening (CDW) over 12 weeks, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score. The incidence of adverse events was also assessed.
RESULTS RESULTS
Most frequently received prior DMTs at baseline were glatiramer acetate and interferon beta-1a across treatment groups. Teriflunomide 14 mg significantly reduced ARR versus placebo in the core period, regardless of prior treatment status. In the core and extension periods, adjusted ARRs were low (0.193-0.284) in patients treated with teriflunomide 14 mg across all subgroups. Probability of CDW by Year 4 was similar across subgroups; by Year 5, the percentage of patients with 12-week CDW was similar in treatment-naive patients and patients recently treated with another DMT (33.9 and 33.7%, respectively). EDSS scores were stable over time in all prior-treatment subgroups. There were no new or unexpected safety signals. Limitations include selective bias due to patient attrition, variability in subgroup size, and lack of magnetic resonance imaging outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The efficacy and safety of teriflunomide 14 mg was similar in all patients with relapsing MS, regardless of prior treatment history.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
Phase 2 trial core: NCT01487096 ; Phase 2 trial extension: NCT00228163 ; TEMSO core: NCT00134563 ; TEMSO extension: NCT00803049 ; TOWER: NCT00751881 ; TENERE: NCT00883337 .

Identifiants

pubmed: 33023488
doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01937-4
pii: 10.1186/s12883-020-01937-4
pmc: PMC7539502
doi:

Substances chimiques

Crotonates 0
Hydroxybutyrates 0
Nitriles 0
Toluidines 0
teriflunomide 1C058IKG3B

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00883337', 'NCT00134563', 'NCT00803049', 'NCT00228163', 'NCT00751881', 'NCT01487096']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase II Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

364

Références

Mult Scler. 2014 May;20(6):705-16
pubmed: 24126064
Mult Scler. 2018 Apr;24(4):535-539
pubmed: 28304217
Sci Transl Med. 2019 May 1;11(490):
pubmed: 31043571
N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 6;365(14):1293-303
pubmed: 21991951
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Oct;7(10):903-14
pubmed: 18789766
BMJ. 2018 Nov 27;363:k4674
pubmed: 30482751
Neurology. 2006 Mar 28;66(6):894-900
pubmed: 16567708
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2018 Jun;174(6):419-428
pubmed: 29703445
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Mar;13(3):247-56
pubmed: 24461574

Auteurs

Giancarlo Comi (G)

Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy. comi.giancarlo@hsr.it.

Mark S Freedman (MS)

University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Rd, Box, Ottawa, ON, 601, Canada.

José E Meca-Lallana (JE)

National Multiple Sclerosis Reference Center (CSUR), Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca (IMIB-Arrixaca), Ctra, Madrid-Cartagena, s/n, 30120, Murcia, Spain.
Cátedra de Neuroinmunología Clínica y Esclerosis Múltiple, UCAM Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, Campus de los Jerónimos, 30107, Murcia, Guadalupe, Spain.

Patrick Vermersch (P)

Univ. Lille, INSERM UMR-S1172 - Lille Neuroscience et Cognition, CHU Lille, FHU Imminent, Lille, France.

Byoung Joon Kim (BJ)

Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Ilwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, South Korea.

Alexander Parajeles (A)

San Juan de Dios Hospital, Paseo Colón, Merced, San José, Costa Rica.

Keith R Edwards (KR)

Multiple Sclerosis Center of Northeastern New York, 1182 Troy-Schenectady Rd, Ste 203, Latham, NY, 12110, USA.

Ralf Gold (R)

St Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, 5092414 Gudrunstrasse 56, D-44791, Bochum, Germany.

Houari Korideck (H)

Sanofi, 500 Kendall Street, 6th Floor, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.
Present address: Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

Jeffrey Chavin (J)

Sanofi, 500 Kendall Street, 6th Floor, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.

Elizabeth M Poole (EM)

Sanofi, 500 Kendall Street, 6th Floor, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.
Present address: Bluebirdbio, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Patricia K Coyle (PK)

Department of Neurology, Stony Brook University, HSC T12-020, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8121, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH