Sequential Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Newly Diagnosed High-risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Enzalutamide is Predictive of Therapeutic Response.
Aged
Androgen Antagonists
/ administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ adverse effects
Benzamides
/ administration & dosage
Fatigue
/ chemically induced
Hot Flashes
/ chemically induced
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Neoadjuvant Therapy
/ adverse effects
Nitriles
/ administration & dosage
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
/ methods
Phenylthiohydantoin
/ administration & dosage
Prostate
/ diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Risk Factors
Tumor Burden
/ drug effects
Journal
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
ISSN: 1557-3265
Titre abrégé: Clin Cancer Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502500
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 01 2021
15 01 2021
Historique:
received:
16
06
2020
revised:
26
08
2020
accepted:
01
10
2020
pubmed:
8
10
2020
medline:
11
1
2022
entrez:
7
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
For high-risk prostate cancer, standard treatment options include radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Despite definitive therapy, many patients will have disease recurrence. Imaging has the potential to better define characteristics of response and resistance. In this study, we evaluated prostate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) before and after neoadjuvant enzalutamide plus ADT. Men with localized intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer underwent a baseline mpMRI and mpMRI-targeted biopsy followed by a second mpMRI after 6 months of enzalutamide and ADT prior to RP. Specimens were sectioned in the same plane as mpMRI using patient-specific 3D-printed molds to permit mpMRI-targeted biopsies to be compared with the same lesion from the RP. Specimens were analyzed for imaging and histologic correlates of response. Of 39 patients enrolled, 36 completed imaging and RP. Most patients (92%) had high-risk disease. Fifty-eight lesions were detected on baseline mpMRI, of which 40 (69%) remained measurable at 6-month follow-up imaging. Fifty-five of 59 lesions (93%) demonstrated >50% volume reduction on posttreatment mpMRI. Three of 59 lesions (5%) demonstrated growth in size at follow-up imaging, with two lesions increasing more than 3-fold in volume. On whole-mount pathology, 15 patients demonstrated minimal residual disease (MRD) of <0.05 cc or pathologic complete response. Low initial mpMRI relative tumor burden was most predictive of MRD on final pathology. Low relative lesion volume at baseline mpMRI was predictive of pathologic response. A subset of patients had limited response. Selection of patients based on these metrics may improve outcomes in high-risk disease.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33023952
pii: 1078-0432.CCR-20-2344
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2344
pmc: PMC7855232
mid: NIHMS1635962
doi:
Substances chimiques
Androgen Antagonists
0
Benzamides
0
Nitriles
0
Phenylthiohydantoin
2010-15-3
enzalutamide
93T0T9GKNU
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02430480']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
429-437Subventions
Organisme : CCR NIH HHS
ID : HHSN261200800001C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN261200800001E
Pays : United States
Organisme : Intramural NIH HHS
ID : Z01 SC010098
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.
Références
Urology. 2005 Dec;66(6):1245-50
pubmed: 16360451
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 31;371(5):424-33
pubmed: 24881730
Radiology. 2019 Mar;290(3):709-719
pubmed: 30667329
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 May;83(10):3500-4
pubmed: 3010302
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 27;367(13):1187-97
pubmed: 22894553
Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):16-40
pubmed: 26427566
Eur Urol. 2020 Aug;78(2):163-170
pubmed: 32370911
Nat Rev Urol. 2018 May;15(5):271-286
pubmed: 29460922
Ther Adv Urol. 2017 Mar 01;9(3-4):73-80
pubmed: 28392836
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Apr 10;37(11):923-931
pubmed: 30811282
Urology. 2003 Feb;61(2 Suppl 1):32-8
pubmed: 12667885
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 20;28(9):1508-13
pubmed: 20159826
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 28;378(26):2465-2474
pubmed: 29949494
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2014 Oct;12(5):312-6
pubmed: 24806400
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Dec 1;25(23):6916-6924
pubmed: 31363002
Cancer Res. 2018 Aug 15;78(16):4716-4730
pubmed: 29921690
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):917-928
pubmed: 32130814
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30
pubmed: 31912902
J Urol. 2011 Nov;186(5):1818-24
pubmed: 21944089
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 20;32(33):3705-15
pubmed: 25311217
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 10;37(32):2974-2986
pubmed: 31329516
Cancer Res. 2013 Feb 1;73(3):1050-5
pubmed: 23204237
Prostate. 1999 May;39(2):135-48
pubmed: 10221570
Urology. 1997 Mar;49(3A Suppl):46-55
pubmed: 9123736
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018 Sep;21(3):364-372
pubmed: 29263420
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 May 1;23(9):2169-2176
pubmed: 28151719
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jan;26(1):297-305
pubmed: 30430324
Nat Commun. 2020 Feb 13;11(1):837
pubmed: 32054861
Br J Urol. 1997 Mar;79(3):432-8
pubmed: 9117227