An easy way to determine bone mineral density and predict pelvic insufficiency fractures in patients treated with radiotherapy for cervical cancer.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bone Density
Brachytherapy
/ adverse effects
Chemoradiotherapy
/ adverse effects
Combined Modality Therapy
Disease Susceptibility
Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
Female
Fractures, Spontaneous
/ etiology
Humans
Incidence
Lumbar Vertebrae
/ chemistry
Lymphatic Irradiation
/ adverse effects
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Middle Aged
Minerals
/ analysis
Organs at Risk
/ radiation effects
Osteoporotic Fractures
/ etiology
Pelvic Bones
/ diagnostic imaging
Radiation Injuries
/ prevention & control
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
/ adverse effects
Risk Factors
Sacrum
/ chemistry
Spinal Fractures
/ etiology
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
/ methods
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
/ radiotherapy
Cisplatinum
Gynaecological tumors
Magnetic resonance imaging
Radiation therapy
Journal
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]
ISSN: 1439-099X
Titre abrégé: Strahlenther Onkol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8603469
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
23
04
2020
accepted:
07
09
2020
pubmed:
8
10
2020
medline:
21
9
2021
entrez:
7
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to investigate whether bone mineral density (BMD) as measured in planning computed tomographies (CTs) by a new method is a risk factor for pelvic insufficiency fractures (PIF) after radio(chemo)therapy (R(C)T) for cervical cancer. 62 patients with cervical cancer who received definitive or adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy between 2013 and 2017 were reviewed. The PIF were detected on follow-up magntic resonance imaging (MRI). The MRI of the PIF patients was registered to the planning CT and the PIF contoured. On the contralateral side of the fracture, a mirrored structure of the fracture was generated (mPIF). For the whole sacral bone, three lumbar vertebrae, the first and second sacral vertebrae, and the PIF, we analyzed the BMD (mg/cm Out of 62 patients, 6 (9.7%) had a fracture. Two out of the 6 patients had a bilateral fracture with only one of them being symptomatic. PIF patients showed a significantly lower BMD in the sacral and the lumbar vertebrae (p < 0.05). The BMD of the contoured PIF, however, when comparing to the mPIF, did not reach significance (p < 0.49). The difference of the V50Gy of the sacrum in the PIF group compared to the other (OTH) patients, i.e. those without PIF, did not reach significance. The dose does not seem to have a relevant impact on the incidence of PIF in our patients. One of the predisposing factors for developing PIF after radiotherapy seems to be the low BMD. We presented an easy method to assess the BMD in planning CTs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33025097
doi: 10.1007/s00066-020-01690-0
pii: 10.1007/s00066-020-01690-0
pmc: PMC8154790
doi:
Substances chimiques
Minerals
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
487-493Références
N Engl J Med. 1999 Apr 15;340(15):1144-53
pubmed: 10202165
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Mar 1;106(3):475-484
pubmed: 31580930
J Radiat Res. 2013 Nov 1;54(6):1102-9
pubmed: 23685668
Cancer. 2010 Feb 1;116(3):625-30
pubmed: 20052724
Br J Radiol. 2017 May;90(1073):20160885
pubmed: 28291401
Gynecol Oncol. 1999 May;73(2):177-83
pubmed: 10329031
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Aug;35(8):1628-33
pubmed: 24627455
Gynecol Oncol. 2002 Sep;86(3):264-8
pubmed: 12217746
Radiology. 1985 Jul;156(1):15-20
pubmed: 4001403
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Nov;167(5):1205-10
pubmed: 8911181
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Oct 1;84(2):e195-200
pubmed: 22583605
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Nov 15;84(4):973-82
pubmed: 22898381
N Engl J Med. 1999 Apr 15;340(15):1154-61
pubmed: 10202166
Eur J Radiol. 2009 Sep;71(3):398-405
pubmed: 19700255
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Apr 1;97(5):1032-1039
pubmed: 28332986
JAMA. 1995 Aug 2;274(5):387-93
pubmed: 7616634
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Mar 15;70(4):1183-8
pubmed: 17919836
N Engl J Med. 1999 Apr 15;340(15):1137-43
pubmed: 10202164