Identification of psychological correlates of dietary misreporting under laboratory and free-living environments.


Journal

The British journal of nutrition
ISSN: 1475-2662
Titre abrégé: Br J Nutr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372547

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 07 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 9 10 2020
medline: 15 12 2021
entrez: 8 10 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Errors inherent in self-reported measures of energy intake (EI) are substantial and well documented, but correlates of misreporting remain unclear. Therefore, potential predictors of misreporting were examined. In Study One, fifty-nine individuals (BMI = 26·1 (sd 3·8) kg/m2, age = 42·7 (sd 13·6) years, females = 29) completed a 14-d stay in a residential feeding behaviour suite where eating behaviour was continuously monitored. In Study Two, 182 individuals (BMI = 25·7 (sd 3·9) kg/m2, age = 42·4 (sd 12·2) years, females = 96) completed two consecutive days in a residential feeding suite and five consecutive days at home. Misreporting was directly quantified by comparing covertly measured laboratory weighed intakes (LWI) with self-reported EI (weighed dietary record (WDR), 24-h recall, 7-d diet history, FFQ). Personal (age, sex and %body fat) and psychological traits (personality, social desirability, body image, intelligence quotient and eating behaviour) were used as predictors of misreporting. In Study One, those with lower psychoticism (P = 0·009), openness to experience (P = 0·006) and higher agreeableness (P = 0·038) reduced EI on days participants knew EI was being measured to a greater extent than on covert days. Isolated associations existed between personality traits (psychoticism and openness to experience), eating behaviour (emotional eating) and differences between the LWI and self-reported EI, but these were inconsistent between dietary assessment techniques and typically became non-significant after accounting for multiplicity of comparisons. In Study Two, sex was associated with differences between LWI and the WDR (P = 0·009), 24-h recall (P = 0·002) and diet history (P = 0·050) in the laboratory, but not home environment. Personal and psychological correlates of misreporting identified displayed no clear pattern across studies or dietary assessment techniques and had little utility in predicting misreporting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33028428
pii: S000711452000389X
doi: 10.1017/S000711452000389X
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

264-275

Auteurs

Mark Hopkins (M)

School of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Environment, University of Leeds, LeedsLS2 9JT, UK.

Joanna Michalowska (J)

Department of Treatment of Obesity, Metabolic Disorders and Clinical Dietetics, Medical Faculty I, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 60-569Poznań, Poland.

Stephen Whybrow (S)

Public Health Nutrition Research Group, Rowett Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Aberdeen, AberdeenAB25 2ZD, UK.

Graham W Horgan (GW)

Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland, AberdeenAB15 8QH, UK.

R James Stubbs (RJ)

School of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, LeedsLS2 9JT, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH