A survey of current trends in root canal treatment: access cavity design and cleaning and shaping practices.
apical gauging
endodontic access
irrigation
smear layer
survey
Journal
Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc
ISSN: 1747-4477
Titre abrégé: Aust Endod J
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 100888004
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
12
08
2020
accepted:
16
09
2020
pubmed:
9
10
2020
medline:
7
4
2021
entrez:
8
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to evaluate current trends in access cavity design and cleaning and shaping among endodontists. A survey was e-mailed to active members of the American Association of Endodontists. Data showed that most respondents used traditional (57%) or conservative (43%) access cavities; less than 1% reported using ultraconservative access cavities. A glide path was created by 93% of respondents; NaOCl was used as lubricant by 51% of respondents, while 28% used RC Prep, 9% used liquid EDTA, 7% used Glyde, and 2% did not use any lubricant. Most respondents used NaOCl at 5.25% or higher concentration. Smear layer was removed by 92% of endodontists. Apical gauging was mostly accomplished with hand files. Clinical preferences varied among surveyed endodontists and among different age groups. Currently, very few endodontists use ultraconservative access preparations. There was large variation among the respondents suggesting a possible need for quality guidelines.
Substances chimiques
Root Canal Irrigants
0
Edetic Acid
9G34HU7RV0
Sodium Hypochlorite
DY38VHM5OD
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
27-33Informations de copyright
© 2020 Australian Society of Endodontology Inc.
Références
Patel S, Rhodes J. A practical guide to endodontic access cavity preparation in molar teeth. Br Dent J 2007; 203: 133-40.
Clark D, Khademi J. Modern molar endodontic access and directed dentin conservation. Dent Clin North Am 2010; 54: 249-73.
Corsentino G, Pedulla E, Castelli L et al. Influence of access cavity preparation and remaining tooth substance on fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 2018; 44: 1416-21.
Boveda C, Kishen A. Contracted endodontic cavities: The foundation for less invasive alternatives in the management of apical periodontitis. Endod Topics 2015; 33: 169-86.
Rover G, Belladonna FG, Bortoluzzi EA et al. Influence of access cavity design on root canal detection, instrumentation efficacy, and fracture resistance assessed in maxillary molars. J Endod 2017; 43: 1657-62.
Roland DD, Andelin WE, Browning DF et al. The effect of preflaring on the rates of separation for 0.04 taper nickel titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2002; 28: 543-5.
Peters OA, Peters CI, Schönenberger K, Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: Effects of canal anatomy on final shape analysed by micro ct. Int Endod J 2003; 36: 86-92.
Best M, Springthorpe VS, Sattar SA. Feasibility of a combined carrier test for disinfectants: Studies with a mixture of five types of microorganisms. Am J Infect Control 1994; 22: 152-62.
Haikel Y, Gorce F, Allemann C, Voegel JC. In vitro efficiency of endodontic irrigation solutions on protein desorption. Int Endod J 1994; 27: 16-20.
Senia ES, Marshall FJ, Rosen S. The solvent action of sodium hypochlorite on pulp tissue of extracted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971; 31: 96-103.
Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006; 32: 389-98.
Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S et al. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: Systematic review of the literature - part 2. Influence of clinical factors. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 6-31.
Violich DR, Chandler NP. The smear layer in endodontics - a review. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 2-15.
Sabeti M, Simon JH, Slots J. Cytomegalovirus and epstein-barr virus are associated with symptomatic periapical pathosis. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2003; 18: 327-8.
Kuci A, Alacam T, Yavas O et al. Sealer penetration into dentinal tubules in the presence or absence of smear layer: A confocal laser scanning microscopic study. J Endod 2014; 40: 1627-31.
Logsdon J, Dunlap C, Arias A et al. Current trends in use and reuse of nickel-titanium engine-driven instruments: A survey of endodontists in the united states. J Endod 2020; 46: 391-6.
Lee M, Winkler J, Hartwell G et al. Current trends in endodontic practice: Emergency treatments and technological armamentarium. J Endod 2009; 35: 35-9.
Dutner J, Mines P, Anderson A. Irrigation trends among american association of endodontists members: A web-based survey. J Endod 2012; 38: 37-40.
Bird DC, Chambers D, Peters OA. Usage parameters of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: A survey of endodontists in the united states. J Endod 2009; 35: 1193-7.
Lee JY, Kersten DD, Mines P, Beltran TA. Regenerative endodontic procedures among endodontists: A web-based survey. J Endod 2018; 44: 250-5.
Cook CRT, Health F. A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educ Psychol Meas 2000; 60: 821-36.
Funkhouser E, Fellows JL, Gordan VV et al. Supplementing online surveys with a mailed option to reduce bias and improve response rate: The national dental practice-based research network. J Public Health Dent 2014; 74: 276-82.
Plotino G, Grande NM, Isufi A et al. Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth with different access cavity designs. J Endod 2017; 43: 995-1000.
Ozyurek T, Ulker O, Demiryurek EO, Yilmaz F. The effects of endodontic access cavity preparation design on the fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth: Traditional versus conservative preparation. J Endod 2018; 44: 800-5.
Krishan R, Paque F, Ossareh A et al. Impacts of conservative endodontic cavity on root canal instrumentation efficacy and resistance to fracture assessed in incisors, premolars, and molars. J Endod 2014; 40: 1160-6.
Shantiaee Y, Dianat O, Sharifi F et al. The impact of three different canal lubricants on fracture, deformity and metal slivering of ProTaper rotary instruments. Iran Endod J 2014; 9: 127-30.
Boessler C, Peters OA, Zehnder M. Impact of lubricant parameters on rotary instrument torque and force. J Endod 2007; 33: 280-3.
Iandolo A, Dagna A, Poggio C et al. Evaluation of the actual chlorine concentration and the required time for pulp dissolution using different sodium hypochlorite irrigating solutions. J Conserv Dent 2019; 22: 108-13.
Verma N, Sangwan P, Tewari S, Duhan J. Effect of different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite on outcome of primary root canal treatment: A randomized controlled trial. J Endod 2019; 45: 357-63.
Aminoshariae A, Kulild J. Master apical file size - smaller or larger: A systematic review of microbial reduction. Int Endod J 2015; 48: 1007-22.
Torabinejad M, Handysides R, Khademi AA, Bakland LK. Clinical implications of the smear layer in endodontics: A review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94: 658-66.