Genome wide association studies for japonica rice resistance to blast in field and controlled conditions.
Blast disease
Blast resistance
Genome-wide association study (GWAS)
Marker-trait associations (MTAs)
Rice
Journal
Rice (New York, N.Y.)
ISSN: 1939-8425
Titre abrégé: Rice (N Y)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101503136
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Oct 2020
08 Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
24
03
2020
accepted:
24
09
2020
entrez:
8
10
2020
pubmed:
9
10
2020
medline:
9
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Rice blast, caused by the fungus Pyricularia oryzae, represents the most damaging fungal disease of rice worldwide. Utilization of rice resistant cultivars represents a practical way to control the disease. Most of the rice varieties cultivated in Europe and several other temperate regions are severely depleted of blast resistance genes, making the identification of resistant sources in genetic background adapted to temperate environments a priority. Given these assumptions, a Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) for rice blast resistance was undertaken using a panel of 311 temperate/tropical japonica and indica accessions adapted to temperate conditions and genotyped with 37,423 SNP markers. The panel was evaluated for blast resistance in field, under the pressure of the natural blast population, and in growth chamber, using a mixture of three different fungal strains. The parallel screening identified 11 accessions showing high levels of resistance in the two conditions, representing potential donors of resistance sources harbored in rice genotypes adapted to temperate conditions. A general higher resistance level was observed in tropical japonica and indica with respect to temperate japonica varieties. The GWAS identified 14 Marker-Traits Associations (MTAs), 8 of which discovered under field conditions and 6 under growth chamber screening. Three MTAs were identified in both conditions; five MTAs were specifically detected under field conditions while three for the growth chamber inoculation. Comparative analysis of physical/genetic positions of the MTAs showed that most of them were positionally-related with cloned or mapped blast resistance genes or with candidate genes whose functions were compatible for conferring pathogen resistance. However, for three MTAs, indicated as BRF10, BRF11-2 and BRGC11-3, no obvious candidate genes or positional relationships with blast resistance QTLs were identified, raising the possibility that they represent new sources of blast resistance. We identified 14 MTAs for blast resistance using both field and growth chamber screenings. A total of 11 accessions showing high levels of resistance in both conditions were discovered. Combinations of loci conferring blast resistance were identified in rice accessions adapted to temperate conditions, thus allowing the genetic dissection of affordable resistances present in the panel. The obtained information will provide useful bases for both resistance breeding and further characterization of the highlighted resistance loci.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Rice blast, caused by the fungus Pyricularia oryzae, represents the most damaging fungal disease of rice worldwide. Utilization of rice resistant cultivars represents a practical way to control the disease. Most of the rice varieties cultivated in Europe and several other temperate regions are severely depleted of blast resistance genes, making the identification of resistant sources in genetic background adapted to temperate environments a priority. Given these assumptions, a Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) for rice blast resistance was undertaken using a panel of 311 temperate/tropical japonica and indica accessions adapted to temperate conditions and genotyped with 37,423 SNP markers. The panel was evaluated for blast resistance in field, under the pressure of the natural blast population, and in growth chamber, using a mixture of three different fungal strains.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The parallel screening identified 11 accessions showing high levels of resistance in the two conditions, representing potential donors of resistance sources harbored in rice genotypes adapted to temperate conditions. A general higher resistance level was observed in tropical japonica and indica with respect to temperate japonica varieties. The GWAS identified 14 Marker-Traits Associations (MTAs), 8 of which discovered under field conditions and 6 under growth chamber screening. Three MTAs were identified in both conditions; five MTAs were specifically detected under field conditions while three for the growth chamber inoculation. Comparative analysis of physical/genetic positions of the MTAs showed that most of them were positionally-related with cloned or mapped blast resistance genes or with candidate genes whose functions were compatible for conferring pathogen resistance. However, for three MTAs, indicated as BRF10, BRF11-2 and BRGC11-3, no obvious candidate genes or positional relationships with blast resistance QTLs were identified, raising the possibility that they represent new sources of blast resistance.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We identified 14 MTAs for blast resistance using both field and growth chamber screenings. A total of 11 accessions showing high levels of resistance in both conditions were discovered. Combinations of loci conferring blast resistance were identified in rice accessions adapted to temperate conditions, thus allowing the genetic dissection of affordable resistances present in the panel. The obtained information will provide useful bases for both resistance breeding and further characterization of the highlighted resistance loci.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33030605
doi: 10.1186/s12284-020-00431-2
pii: 10.1186/s12284-020-00431-2
pmc: PMC7544789
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
71Subventions
Organisme : AGER Foundation
ID : 2010-2369
Organisme : MiPAAF
ID : DM 5337
Références
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010 Aug;13(4):434-41
pubmed: 20627803
Biotechniques. 2002 Jan;32(1):46, 48, 50, 52
pubmed: 11808697
Genetics. 2001 Sep;159(1):371-87
pubmed: 11560912
J Plant Physiol. 2005 Aug;162(8):945-58
pubmed: 16146321
Genetics. 2007 Dec;177(4):2223-32
pubmed: 17947413
Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):963-71
pubmed: 7851788
Bioinformatics. 2005 Jan 15;21(2):263-5
pubmed: 15297300
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2015 Aug;26:92-101
pubmed: 26162502
J Exp Bot. 2008;59(6):1383-97
pubmed: 18390848
Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 26;5:15678
pubmed: 26498172
Mol Plant Pathol. 2016 Aug;17(6):959-72
pubmed: 26574735
Bot Stud. 2018 Dec 21;59(1):32
pubmed: 30578469
DNA Res. 2002 Dec 31;9(6):257-79
pubmed: 12597280
Cell Res. 2011 May;21(5):835-48
pubmed: 21221134
Genome Biol. 2011 Oct 28;12(10):232
pubmed: 22035733
Bioinformatics. 2003 May 1;19(7):889-90
pubmed: 12724300
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2015 Dec;28(12):1383-92
pubmed: 26284908
PLoS One. 2011 May 04;6(5):e19379
pubmed: 21573248
Bioinformatics. 2007 Oct 1;23(19):2633-5
pubmed: 17586829
Rice (N Y). 2019 Jul 15;12(1):47
pubmed: 31309315
DNA Res. 2015 Apr;22(2):133-45
pubmed: 25627243
PLoS One. 2016 May 26;11(5):e0155425
pubmed: 27228161
Sci Rep. 2015 Jan 14;5:7773
pubmed: 25586962
Plant Biotechnol J. 2020 Jun;18(6):1376-1383
pubmed: 31742855
Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2015;17:57-73
pubmed: 25706446
Plant Physiol. 2008 Aug;147(4):2017-29
pubmed: 18567828
Theor Appl Genet. 2015 Nov;128(11):2213-25
pubmed: 26183036
Nat Biotechnol. 2011 Dec 11;30(1):105-11
pubmed: 22158310
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Oct 30;8:1862
pubmed: 29163588
Rice (N Y). 2016 Dec;9(1):44
pubmed: 27576685
Mol Genet Genomics. 2005 Dec;274(6):569-78
pubmed: 16228246
Rice (N Y). 2013 Feb 06;6(1):4
pubmed: 24280374
PLoS Biol. 2014 Jun 10;12(6):e1001883
pubmed: 24914810
Behav Genet. 1997 Mar;27(2):125-32
pubmed: 9145551
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006 Nov;19(11):1216-28
pubmed: 17073304
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jan 03;7:1918
pubmed: 28096805
Mol Plant Pathol. 2012 May;13(4):414-30
pubmed: 22471698
Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Mar;3(3):430-439
pubmed: 30718852
Theor Appl Genet. 2017 Jan;130(1):123-135
pubmed: 27699464
Mol Genet Genomics. 2016 Feb;291(1):17-32
pubmed: 26141566
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75
pubmed: 17701901
Elife. 2016 Dec 23;5:
pubmed: 28008850
Science. 2009 Aug 21;325(5943):998-1001
pubmed: 19696351
Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945-59
pubmed: 10835412
J Genet Genomics. 2018 Dec 20;45(12):663-672
pubmed: 30606471
Rice (N Y). 2016 Dec;9(1):59
pubmed: 27830537
BMC Plant Biol. 2010 Sep 17;10:206
pubmed: 20849575
Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Jul;33(7):1870-4
pubmed: 27004904
Rice (N Y). 2017 Dec;10(1):29
pubmed: 28597326
Theor Appl Genet. 2016 May;129(5):1035-44
pubmed: 26883042
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2015 Feb;23:98-108
pubmed: 25449733
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2014;52:213-41
pubmed: 24906128
Plant J. 2006 Jun;46(5):794-804
pubmed: 16709195