Magnetic resonance imaging-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation in patients with localised prostate cancer: 3-year outcomes of a prospective Phase I study.
Aged
Biopsy, Large-Core Needle
Erectile Dysfunction
/ etiology
Follow-Up Studies
High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation
/ adverse effects
Humans
Male
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ diagnosis
Penile Erection
Postoperative Complications
/ etiology
Prostate-Specific Antigen
/ blood
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ blood
Quality of Life
Recovery of Function
Salvage Therapy
Surgery, Computer-Assisted
/ adverse effects
Urethra
Urinary Retention
/ etiology
#PCSM
#ProstateCancer
#uroonc
Phase 1 clinical trial
image-guided intervention
magnetic resonance imaging
minimally invasive
prostate cancer
transurethral
ultrasound ablation
Journal
BJU international
ISSN: 1464-410X
Titre abrégé: BJU Int
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100886721
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
11
10
2020
medline:
21
9
2021
entrez:
10
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To report the 3-year follow-up of a Phase I study of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) in 30 men with localised prostate cancer. Favourable 12-month safety and ablation precision were previously described. As a mandated safety criterion, TULSA was delivered as near whole-gland ablation, applying 3-mm margins sparing 10% of peripheral prostate tissue in 30 men. After 12-month biopsy and MRI, biannual follow-up included prostate-specific antigen (PSA), adverse events (AEs), and functional quality-of-life assessment, with repeat systematic biopsy at 3 years. A 3-year follow-up was completed by 22 patients. Between 1 and 3 years, there were no new serious or severe AEs. Urinary and bowel function remained stable. Erectile function recovered by 1 year and was stable at 3 years. The PSA level decreased 95% to a median (interquartile range) nadir of 0.33 (0.1-0.4) ng/mL, stable to 0.8 (0.4-1.6) ng/mL at 3 years. Serial biopsies identified clinically significant disease in 10/29 men (34%) and any cancer in 17/29 (59%). By 3 years, seven men had recurrence (four histological, three biochemical) and had undergone salvage therapy without complications (including six prostatectomies). At 3 years, three of 22 men refused biopsy, and two of the 22 (9%) had clinically significant disease (one new, one persistent). Predictors of salvage therapy requirement included less extensive ablation coverage and higher PSA nadir. With 3-year Phase I follow-up, TULSA demonstrates safe and precise ablation for men with localised prostate cancer, providing predictable PSA and biopsy outcomes, without affecting functional abilities or precluding salvage therapy.
Substances chimiques
Prostate-Specific Antigen
EC 3.4.21.77
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase I
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
544-552Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors BJU International © 2020 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Valerio M, Cerantola Y, Eggener SE et al. New and established technology in focal ablation of the prostate: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2017; 71: 17-34
Chopra R, Baker N, Choy V et al. MRI-compatible transurethral ultrasound system for the treatment of localized prostate cancer using rotational control. Med Phys 2008; 35: 1346-57
Chopra R, Colquhoun A, Burtnyk M et al. MR imaging-controlled transurethral ultrasound therapy for conformal treatment of prostate tissue: initial feasibility in humans. Radiology 2012; 265: 303-13
Ramsay E, Mougenot C, Staruch R et al. Evaluation of focal ablation of magnetic resonance imaging defined prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging controlled transurethral ultrasound therapy with prostatectomy as the reference standard. J Urol 2017; 197: 255-61
Chin JL, Billia M, Relle J et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation of prostate tissue in patients with localized prostate cancer: a prospective phase 1 clinical trial. Eur Urol 2016; 70: 447-55
Bonekamp D, Wolf MB, Roethke MC et al. Twelve-month prostate volume reduction after MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation of the prostate. Eur Radiol 2019; 29: 299-308
Roach M 3rd, Hanks G, Thames H Jr et al. Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 65: 965-74
Nair SM, Stern N, Dewar M et al. Salvage open radical prostatectomy for recurrent prostate cancer following MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) of the prostate: feasibility and efficacy. Scand J Urol 2020; 54: 215-9
Burtnyk M, Hill T, Cadieux-Pitre H, Welch I. Magnetic resonance image guided transurethral ultrasound prostate ablation: a preclinical safety and feasibility study with 28-day followup. J Urol 2015; 193: 1669-75
Azzouzi AR, Vincendeau S, Barret E et al. Padeliporfin vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy versus active surveillance in men with low-risk prostate cancer (CLIN1001 PCM301): an open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18: 181-91
Guillaumier S, Peters M, Arya M et al. A multicentre study of 5-year outcomes following focal therapy in treating clinically significant nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2018; 74: 422-9
Crouzet S, Chapelon JY, Rouviere O et al. Whole-gland ablation of localized prostate cancer with high-intensity focused ultrasound: oncologic outcomes and morbidity in 1002 patients. Eur Urol 2014; 65: 907-14
Valerio M, Anele C, Charman SC et al. Transperineal template prostate-mapping biopsies: an evaluation of different protocols in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. BJU Int 2016; 118: 384-90
Hatiboglu G, Popeneciu V, Bonekamp D et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation of prostate tissue in patients with localized prostate cancer: single-center evaluation of 6-month treatment safety and functional outcomes of intensified treatment parameters. World J Urol 2020; 38: 343-50
Eggener S, Penson DF, Pavlovich C et al. LBA-26 Pivotal trial of MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation in men with localized prostate cancer. AUA 2019; Chicago, IL. J Urol 2019; 201(Suppl. 4): e1004.
Ahmed HU, Dickinson L, Charman S et al. Focal ablation targeted to the index lesion in multifocal localised prostate cancer: a prospective development study. Eur Urol 2015; 68: 927-36
Resnick MJ, Koyama T, Fan KH et al. Long-term functional outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 436-45
Nam RK, Cheung P, Herschorn S et al. Incidence of complications other than urinary incontinence or erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 223-31