Maximizing efficiency of genomic selection in CIMMYT's tropical maize breeding program.


Journal

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik
ISSN: 1432-2242
Titre abrégé: Theor Appl Genet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0145600

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Historique:
received: 19 04 2020
accepted: 23 09 2020
pubmed: 11 10 2020
medline: 11 6 2021
entrez: 10 10 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Historical data from breeding programs can be efficiently used to improve genomic selection accuracy, especially when the training set is optimized to subset individuals most informative of the target testing set. The current strategy for large-scale implementation of genomic selection (GS) at the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) global maize breeding program has been to train models using information from full-sibs in a "test-half-predict-half approach." Although effective, this approach has limitations, as it requires large full-sib populations and limits the ability to shorten variety testing and breeding cycle times. The primary objective of this study was to identify optimal experimental and training set designs to maximize prediction accuracy of GS in CIMMYT's maize breeding programs. Training set (TS) design strategies were evaluated to determine the most efficient use of phenotypic data collected on relatives for genomic prediction (GP) using datasets containing 849 (DS1) and 1389 (DS2) DH-lines evaluated as testcrosses in 2017 and 2018, respectively. Our results show there is merit in the use of multiple bi-parental populations as TS when selected using algorithms to maximize relatedness between the training and prediction sets. In a breeding program where relevant past breeding information is not readily available, the phenotyping expenditure can be spread across connected bi-parental populations by phenotyping only a small number of lines from each population. This significantly improves prediction accuracy compared to within-population prediction, especially when the TS for within full-sib prediction is small. Finally, we demonstrate that prediction accuracy in either sparse testing or "test-half-predict-half" can further be improved by optimizing which lines are planted for phenotyping and which lines are to be only genotyped for advancement based on GP.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33037897
doi: 10.1007/s00122-020-03696-9
pii: 10.1007/s00122-020-03696-9
pmc: PMC7813723
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

279-294

Subventions

Organisme : Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
ID : OPP1134248
Organisme : Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
ID : OPP1093167

Références

Andreescu C, Avendano S, Brown SR, Hassen A, Lamont SJ, Dekkers JCM (2007) Linkage disequilibrium in related breeding lines of chickens. Genetics 177(4):2161–2169
doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.082206
Bassi FM, Bentley AR, Charmet G, Ortiz R, Crossa J (2016) Breeding schemes for the implementation of genomic selection in wheat (Triticum Spp.). Plant Sci Int J Exp Plant Biol 242:23–36
Bernal-Vasquez A-M, Gordillo A, Schmidt M, Piepho H-P (2017) Genomic prediction in early selection stages using multi-year data in a hybrid rye breeding program. BMC Genet. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-017-0512-8
doi: 10.1186/s12863-017-0512-8 pubmed: 28569139 pmcid: 5452640
Beyene Y, Semagn K, Mugo S, Tarekegne A, Babu R, Meisel B, Sehabiague P et al (2015) Genetic gains in grain yield through genomic selection in eight bi-parental maize populations under drought stress. Crop Sci. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2014.07.0460
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2014.07.0460
Beyene Y, Gowda M, Olsen M, Robbins KR, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Alvarado G, Dreher K et al (2019) Empirical comparison of tropical maize hybrids selected through genomic and phenotypic selections. Front Plant Sci 10:1502
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01502
Buckler ES, Ilut DC, Wang X, Kretzschmar T, Gore M, Mitchell SE (2016) rAmpSeq: using repetitive sequences for robust genotyping. https://doi.org/10.1101/096628
Burgueño J, de los Campos G, Weigel K, Crossa J (2012) Genomic prediction of breeding values when modeling genotype × environment interaction using pedigree and dense molecular markers. Crop Sci. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2011.06.0299
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2011.06.0299
Butler DG, Cullis BR, Gilmour AR, Gogel BG, Thompson R (2017) ASReml-R reference manual version 4. VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK
Clark SA, Hickey JM, Daetwyler HD, van der Werf Julius H J (2012) The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes. Genet Select Evolut 44:4
doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-44-4
Cobb JN, Juma RU, Biswas PS, Arbelaez JD, Rutkoski J, Atlin G, Hagen T, Quinn M, Ng EH (2019) Enhancing the rate of genetic gain in public-sector plant breeding programs: lessons from the breeder’s equation. Theor Appl Genet. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03317-0
doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03317-0 pubmed: 30824972 pmcid: 6439161
Crossa J, de los Campos G, Pérez P, Gianola D, Burgueño J, Araus JA, Makumbi D et al (2010) Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers. Genetics 186(2):713–724
doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.118521
Crossa J, Pérez P, de los Campos G, Mahuku G, Dreisigacker S, Magorokosho C (2011) Genomic selection and prediction in plant breeding. J Crop Improv. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2011.558767
doi: 10.1080/15427528.2011.558767
Crossa J, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Cuevas J, Montesinos-López O, Jarquín D, de los Campos G, Burgueño J et al (2017) Genomic selection in plant breeding: methods, models, and perspectives. Trends Plant Sci 22(11):961–975
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.08.011
de los Campos G, Gianola D, Rosa GJM, Weigel KA, Crossa J (2010) Semi-parametric genomic-enabled prediction of genetic values using reproducing kernel hilbert spaces methods. Genet Res 92(4):295–308
doi: 10.1017/S0016672310000285
de los Campos G, Vazquez GAI, Fernando R, Klimentidis YC, Sorensen D (2013) Prediction of complex human traits using the genomic best linear unbiased predictor. PLoS Genet 9(7):e1003608
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003608
Endelman JB, Atlin GN, Beyene Y, Semagn K, Zhang X, Sorrells ME, Jannink J-L (2014) Optimal design of preliminary yield trials with genome-wide markers. Crop Sci. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2013.03.0154
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2013.03.0154
Gilmour AR, Thompson R, Cullis BR (1995) Average information REML: an efficient algorithm for variance parameter estimation in linear mixed models. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533274
doi: 10.2307/2533274
Goddard ME, Hayes BJ, Meuwissen THE (2011) Using the genomic relationship matrix to predict the accuracy of genomic selection. J Anim Breed Genet 128(6):409–421
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2011.00964.x
Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM (2007) The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 177(4):2389–2397
doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.081190
Habier D, Tetens J, Seefried F-R, Lichtner P, Thaller G (2010) The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in german holstein cattle. Genet Select Evolut 42:5
doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-42-5
Hickey JM, Dreisigacker S, Crossa J, Hearne S, Babu R, Prasanna BM, Grondona M et al (2014) Evaluation of genomic selection training population designs and genotyping strategies in plant breeding programs using simulation. Crop Sci. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2013.03.0195
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2013.03.0195
Hickey JM, Chiurugwi T, Mackay I, Powell W (2017) Implementing genomic selection in CGIAR Breeding Programs Workshop Participants. 2017. “Genomic prediction unifies animal and plant breeding programs to form platforms for biological discovery. Nat Genet 49(9):1297–1303
doi: 10.1038/ng.3920
Jacobson A, Lian L, Zhong S, Bernardo R (2014) General combining ability model for genomewide selection in a biparental cross. Crop Sci. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2013.11.0774
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2013.11.0774
Jarquín D, Crossa J, Lacaze X, Cheyron PD, Daucourt J, Lorgeou J, Piraux F et al (2014) A reaction norm model for genomic selection using high-dimensional genomic and environmental data. Theor Appl Genet 127(3):595–607
doi: 10.1007/s00122-013-2243-1
Khansefid M, Pryce JE, Bolormaa S, Miller SP, Wang Z, Li C, Goddard ME (2014) Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population1. J Anim Sci. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-7375
doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7375 pubmed: 25074450
Kremer M, Zwane AP (2005) Encouraging private sector research for tropical agriculture. World Dev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.006
doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.006
Laloë D (1993) Precision and information in linear models of genetic evaluation. Genet Select Evolut. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-25-6-557
doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-25-6-557
Langyintuo AS, Mwangi W, Diallo AO, MacRobert J, Dixon J, Bänziger M (2010) Challenges of the maize seed industry in eastern and southern Africa: a compelling case for private–public intervention to promote growth. Food Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.01.005
doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.01.005
Lee S, Hong WM, Weerasinghe SP, Wray NR, Goddard ME, van der Werf Julius H J (2017) Using information of relatives in genomic prediction to apply effective stratified medicine. Sci Rep 7:42091
doi: 10.1038/srep42091
Lin Z, Hayes BJ, Daetwyler HD (2014) Genomic selection in crops, trees and forages: a review. Crop Past Sci. https://doi.org/10.1071/cp13363
doi: 10.1071/cp13363
Meuwissen TH, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001) Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157(4):1819–1829
pubmed: 1461589 pmcid: 1461589
Pszczola M, Strabel T, Mulder HA, Calus MPL (2012) Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population. J Dairy Sci 95(1):389–400
doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4338
Rincent R, Laloë D, Nicolas S, Altmann T, Brunel D, Revilla P, Rodríguez VM et al (2012) Maximizing the reliability of genomic selection by optimizing the calibration set of reference individuals: comparison of methods in two diverse groups of maize inbreds (Zea Mays L.). Genetics 192(2):715–728
doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.141473
R Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Santantonio N, Atanda SA, Beyene Y, Varshney RK, Olsen M, Jones E, Roorkiwal M et al (2020) Strategies for effective use of genomic information in crop breeding programs serving Africa and South Asia. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00353
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00353 pubmed: 32292411 pmcid: 7119190
Schopp P, Müller D, Wientjes YCJ, Melchinger AE (2017) Genomic prediction within and across biparental families: means and variances of prediction accuracy and usefulness of deterministic equations. G3 7(11):3571–3586
doi: 10.1534/g3.117.300076
Taylor JF (2014) Implementation and accuracy of genomic selection. Aquaculture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.02.017
doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.02.017
UN (2019) World population prospects 2019: highlights statistical papers-United Nations (Ser. A), population and vital statistics report, UN, New York. https://doi.org/10.18356/13bf5476-en
VanRaden PM (2008) Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci 91(11):4414–4423
doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0980
Vivek BS, Krishna GK, Vengadessan V, Babu R, Zaidi PH, Kha LQ, Mandal SS et al (2017) Use of genomic estimated breeding values results in rapid genetic gains for drought tolerance in maize. Plant Genome. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2016.07.0070
doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2016.07.0070 pubmed: 28464061
Zhang X, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Semagn K, Beyene Y, Babu R, López-Cruz MA, San Vicente F et al (2015) Genomic prediction in biparental tropical maize populations in water-stressed and well-watered environments using low-density and GBS SNPs. Heredity. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2014.99
doi: 10.1038/hdy.2014.99 pubmed: 26126541 pmcid: 4806901

Auteurs

Sikiru Adeniyi Atanda (SA)

West Africa Center for Crop Improvement (WACCI), University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.
Section of Plant Breeding and Genetics, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

Michael Olsen (M)

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Nairobi, Kenya. m.olsen@cgiar.org.

Juan Burgueño (J)

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.

Jose Crossa (J)

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.

Daniel Dzidzienyo (D)

West Africa Center for Crop Improvement (WACCI), University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.

Yoseph Beyene (Y)

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Nairobi, Kenya.

Manje Gowda (M)

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Nairobi, Kenya.

Kate Dreher (K)

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.

Xuecai Zhang (X)

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.

Boddupalli M Prasanna (BM)

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Nairobi, Kenya.

Pangirayi Tongoona (P)

West Africa Center for Crop Improvement (WACCI), University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.

Eric Yirenkyi Danquah (EY)

West Africa Center for Crop Improvement (WACCI), University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.

Gbadebo Olaoye (G)

Agronomy Department, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.

Kelly R Robbins (KR)

Section of Plant Breeding and Genetics, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. krr73@cornell.edu.

Articles similaires

Selecting optimal software code descriptors-The case of Java.

Yegor Bugayenko, Zamira Kholmatova, Artem Kruglov et al.
1.00
Software Algorithms Programming Languages
Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi

A scenario for an evolutionary selection of ageing.

Tristan Roget, Claire Macmurray, Pierre Jolivet et al.
1.00
Aging Selection, Genetic Biological Evolution Animals Fertility
Biological Evolution History, 20th Century Selection, Genetic History, 19th Century Biology

Classifications MeSH