Designing and evaluating an interprofessional education conference approach to antimicrobial education.
Antibiotics
Antimicrobial stewardship
Human errors
IPE
Interprofessional education
Interprofessional learning
Medicine
Pharmacy
Prescribing
Simulation
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Oct 2020
13 Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
10
11
2019
accepted:
23
09
2020
entrez:
14
10
2020
pubmed:
15
10
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Arguably, Medical School curricula are deficient in learning opportunities related to the safe and effective use of medicines, in particular antimicrobials. Infection management is complex and multidisciplinary, and learning opportunities should reflect these principles. Aligned to the complexity of the subject matter, simulation and interprofessional based teaching are methods that can foster the collaborative skills required of future healthcare professionals. There have been calls to develop these methods in the teaching of safe prescribing and the management of infections; however, reports of such studies are limited. We developed an interprofessional education (IPE) conference for second year undergraduate medical and pharmacy students based in the North East of England. We considered contact theory in the design of three small group interprofessional workshops, on the broad themes of antimicrobial stewardship, infection management and patient safety. A mixed methods approach assessed students' attitudes towards IPE, barriers and facilitators of learning, and perceived learning gains. Qualitative data from workshop evaluation forms were analysed thematically, while quantitative data were analysed descriptively and differences between medical and pharmacy cohorts analysed using unpaired two-tailed t-tests. 226/352 students returned the workshop evaluation forms (66% of pharmacy students, 62% of medical students). 281/352 students responded to a series of Likert scale questions on the value of interprofessional education (88% of pharmacy students, 70% of medical students). Students reported acquisition of knowledge and skills, including concepts and procedures related to infection management and antimicrobial prescribing, and the development of problem-solving and critical evaluation skills. Students reflected on their attitude towards interprofessional collaboration. They reported a greater understanding of the roles of other healthcare professionals, reflected on the importance of effective communication in ensuring patient safety, and were more confident to work in interprofessional teams after the conference. A robust IPE event, theoretically underpinned by contact theory and developed collaboratively, achieved interprofessional learning at scale and helped develop healthcare professionals willing to collaborate across disciplines. The resources, and evaluation insights based on the 3P (presage, process, and product) model of learning and teaching, will be of value to other educators who seek to develop theoretically-sound IPE interventions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Arguably, Medical School curricula are deficient in learning opportunities related to the safe and effective use of medicines, in particular antimicrobials. Infection management is complex and multidisciplinary, and learning opportunities should reflect these principles. Aligned to the complexity of the subject matter, simulation and interprofessional based teaching are methods that can foster the collaborative skills required of future healthcare professionals. There have been calls to develop these methods in the teaching of safe prescribing and the management of infections; however, reports of such studies are limited.
METHODS
METHODS
We developed an interprofessional education (IPE) conference for second year undergraduate medical and pharmacy students based in the North East of England. We considered contact theory in the design of three small group interprofessional workshops, on the broad themes of antimicrobial stewardship, infection management and patient safety. A mixed methods approach assessed students' attitudes towards IPE, barriers and facilitators of learning, and perceived learning gains. Qualitative data from workshop evaluation forms were analysed thematically, while quantitative data were analysed descriptively and differences between medical and pharmacy cohorts analysed using unpaired two-tailed t-tests.
RESULTS
RESULTS
226/352 students returned the workshop evaluation forms (66% of pharmacy students, 62% of medical students). 281/352 students responded to a series of Likert scale questions on the value of interprofessional education (88% of pharmacy students, 70% of medical students). Students reported acquisition of knowledge and skills, including concepts and procedures related to infection management and antimicrobial prescribing, and the development of problem-solving and critical evaluation skills. Students reflected on their attitude towards interprofessional collaboration. They reported a greater understanding of the roles of other healthcare professionals, reflected on the importance of effective communication in ensuring patient safety, and were more confident to work in interprofessional teams after the conference.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
A robust IPE event, theoretically underpinned by contact theory and developed collaboratively, achieved interprofessional learning at scale and helped develop healthcare professionals willing to collaborate across disciplines. The resources, and evaluation insights based on the 3P (presage, process, and product) model of learning and teaching, will be of value to other educators who seek to develop theoretically-sound IPE interventions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33050898
doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02252-9
pii: 10.1186/s12909-020-02252-9
pmc: PMC7552509
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Infective Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
360Références
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Feb 28;13:34
pubmed: 23446055
Clin Teach. 2014 Jul;11(4):290-6
pubmed: 24917099
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Sep;64(3):363-72
pubmed: 17506779
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;(3):CD002213
pubmed: 23543515
Health Soc Care Community. 2006 Nov;14(6):541-52
pubmed: 17059496
J Interprof Care. 2018 Sep;32(5):653-655
pubmed: 30044675
J Interprof Care. 2003 Feb;17(1):21-34
pubmed: 12772467
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Aug;82(6):6770
pubmed: 30181677
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Jul;56(1):196-203
pubmed: 15914493
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015 Apr;21(4):354-61
pubmed: 25658523
J Interprof Care. 2004 Feb;18(1):43-56
pubmed: 14668101
Med Educ. 2010 Jan;44(1):50-63
pubmed: 20078756
Mt Sinai J Med. 2009 Aug;76(4):330-43
pubmed: 19642147
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010 Dec;15(5):625-32
pubmed: 20146096
J Interprof Care. 2008 Jan;22(1):57-68
pubmed: 18202986
Med Teach. 2016 Jul;38(7):656-68
pubmed: 27146438
Med Teach. 2007 Oct;29(8):735-51
pubmed: 18236271
Med Teach. 2012;34(8):618-24
pubmed: 22471913
Med Educ. 2012 Jan;46(1):58-70
pubmed: 22150197
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Jan;17(1):80-7
pubmed: 20132254
J Interprof Care. 2005 May;19 Suppl 1:148-65
pubmed: 16096152
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Aug;60 Suppl 1:i27-32
pubmed: 17656378
Med Teach. 2005 Jan;27(1):10-28
pubmed: 16147767
J Interprof Care. 2016 Sep;30(5):615-9
pubmed: 27341310
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 29;11(2):e0150056
pubmed: 26928009
Acad Med. 2011 Jun;86(6):706-11
pubmed: 21512370
J Interprof Care. 2016;30(1):103-8
pubmed: 26833110
J Interprof Care. 2016 Nov;30(6):819-822
pubmed: 27715352
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2016 Dec 05;7:661-670
pubmed: 27980450
J Interprof Care. 2010 Sep;24(5):549-64
pubmed: 20218778
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Jul;66(1):128-34
pubmed: 18492128
Clin Teach. 2016 Feb;13(1):7-12
pubmed: 26817749
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Mar;69(3):842-6
pubmed: 24191307
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2006 Dec;13(6):765-70
pubmed: 17087681
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Jun;69(6):598-606
pubmed: 20565451
J Interprof Care. 2013 Nov;27(6):448-53
pubmed: 23777592
Perspect Med Educ. 2016 Aug;5(4):240-3
pubmed: 27432369
J Interprof Care. 2015;29(5):421-5
pubmed: 26171865
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Aug;81(6):119
pubmed: 28970620
J Interprof Care. 2012 Sep;26(5):370-5
pubmed: 22506886
Acad Med. 2014 Jun;89(6):869-75
pubmed: 24871237