Response of extensively drug resistant Salmonella Typhi to treatment with meropenem and azithromycin, in Pakistan.
Adolescent
Adult
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ pharmacology
Azithromycin
/ economics
Child
Child, Preschool
Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
Humans
Infant
Meropenem
/ economics
Pakistan
/ epidemiology
Retrospective Studies
Salmonella Infections
/ drug therapy
Salmonella typhi
/ drug effects
Young Adult
Journal
PLoS neglected tropical diseases
ISSN: 1935-2735
Titre abrégé: PLoS Negl Trop Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101291488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
received:
07
07
2019
accepted:
05
08
2020
entrez:
15
10
2020
pubmed:
16
10
2020
medline:
7
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Salmonella Typhi is one of the leading health problems in Pakistan. With the emergence of extensively drug resistant (XDR) Salmonella Typhi, treatment options are limited. Here we report the clinical manifestations and the response to treatment of patients with XDR Typhoid fever. The patients were treated with either Meropenem or Azithromycin or a combination of both. We reviewed the records of culture confirmed XDR typhoid who visited Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH), Karachi and Aga Khan Secondary Care Hospital, Hyderabad from April 2017 to June 2018. Symptoms developed during disease, unplanned treatment extension and complications developed while on antimicrobials was recorded. Means with standard deviation were calculated for duration of treatment, time to defervescence, and cost of treatment. Records of 81 culture confirmed XDR typhoid patients admitted at the AKU hospitals were reviewed. Most, (n = 45; 56%) were male. Mean age of the cases was 8.03 years with range (1-40). About three quarter (n = 66) of the patients were treated as inpatient. Fever and vomiting were the most common symptoms at the time of presentation. Oral azithromycin alone (n = 22; 27%), intravenous meropenem alone (n = 20; 25%), or a combination of azithromycin and meropenem (n = 39; 48%) were the options used for treatment. Average (95% confidence interval) time to defervescence was 7.1(5.5-8.6), 6.7(4.7-8.7), and 6.7(5.5-7.9) days for each treatment option respectively whereas there were 1,0 and 3 treatment failures in each treatment option respectively. Average cost of treatment per day for azithromycin was US$5.87 whereas it was US$88.46 for meropenem. Patients treated with either Azithromycin, Meropenem alone or in combination showed similar time to defervescence. Because of the lower cost of azithromycin, it is preferable in lower socio-economic areas. Background estimates for power calculation can be made for more robust clinical trials using this observational data.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33057330
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008682
pii: PNTD-D-19-01072
pmc: PMC7561124
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Azithromycin
83905-01-5
Meropenem
FV9J3JU8B1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0008682Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Apr 23;12(4):e0006380
pubmed: 29684022
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Oct 30;65(10):1754-1756
pubmed: 29020162
N Engl J Med. 2018 Oct 18;379(16):1493-1495
pubmed: 30332569
J Trop Pediatr. 2002 Apr;48(2):102-8
pubmed: 12022423
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 Dec;12(12):907-10
pubmed: 8187784
Ger Med Sci. 2019 Jan 07;17:Doc01
pubmed: 30837820
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Dec;18(12):1368-1376
pubmed: 30507460
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Feb 15;40(4):554-61
pubmed: 15712078
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2017 Apr 10;12:Doc05
pubmed: 28451516
Euro Surveill. 2009 Feb 19;14(7):
pubmed: 19232226
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 08;(4):CD006083
pubmed: 18843701
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1989 Oct;17(4):223-35
pubmed: 2686882
J Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 10;218(suppl_4):S201-S205
pubmed: 30060168
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Jul;17(7):959-63
pubmed: 21722249
mBio. 2018 Feb 20;9(1):
pubmed: 29463654
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2019 Jan - Feb;27:127
pubmed: 30339826
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 Jun;43(6):1441-4
pubmed: 10348767
Trop Doct. 2018 Jul;48(3):182-188
pubmed: 29495943
Indian J Med Res. 2006 Jul;124(1):105-8
pubmed: 16926465
Indian J Pediatr. 2007 Jan;74(1):39-42
pubmed: 17264451
Pan Afr Med J. 2014 Aug 18;18:309
pubmed: 25469202
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jun 1;66(12):1976-1977
pubmed: 29471386
Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Nov;31(5):1134-8
pubmed: 11073741
J Pak Med Assoc. 2016 Aug;66(8):1035-6
pubmed: 27524545
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Nov;28(5):765-72
pubmed: 1778879
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000 Jul;44(7):1855-9
pubmed: 10858343
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1995 Apr;28(4):275-86
pubmed: 7648757