Fgf10-CRISPR mosaic mutants demonstrate the gene dose-related loss of the accessory lobe and decrease in the number of alveolar type 2 epithelial cells in mouse lung.
Alveolar Epithelial Cells
/ cytology
Animals
Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats
/ genetics
Disease Models, Animal
Embryo, Mammalian
/ metabolism
Fibroblast Growth Factor 10
/ genetics
Gene Dosage
Gene Editing
/ methods
Genotype
Lung
/ cytology
Lung Diseases
/ metabolism
Mice
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Mice, Inbred DBA
Mice, Knockout
Mice, Transgenic
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
05
06
2020
accepted:
23
09
2020
entrez:
15
10
2020
pubmed:
16
10
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing often generates founder generation (F0) mice that exhibit somatic mosaicism in the targeted gene(s). It has been known that Fibroblast growth factor 10 (Fgf10)-null mice exhibit limbless and lungless phenotypes, while intermediate limb phenotypes (variable defective limbs) are observed in the Fgf10-CRISPR F0 mice. However, how the lung phenotype in the Fgf10-mosaic mutants is related to the limb phenotype and genotype has not been investigated. In this study, we examined variable lung phenotypes in the Fgf10-targeted F0 mice to determine if the lung phenotype was correlated with percentage of functional Fgf10 genotypes. Firstly, according to a previous report, Fgf10-CRISPR F0 embryos on embryonic day 16.5 (E16.5) were classified into three types: type I, no limb; type II, limb defect; and type III, normal limbs. Cartilage and bone staining showed that limb truncations were observed in the girdle, (type I), stylopodial, or zeugopodial region (type II). Deep sequencing of the Fgf10-mutant genomes revealed that the mean proportion of codons that encode putative functional FGF10 was 8.3 ± 6.2% in type I, 25.3 ± 2.7% in type II, and 54.3 ± 9.5% in type III (mean ± standard error of the mean) mutants at E16.5. Histological studies showed that almost all lung lobes were absent in type I embryos. The accessory lung lobe was often absent in type II embryos with other lobes dysplastic. All lung lobes formed in type III embryos. The number of terminal tubules was significantly lower in type I and II embryos, but unchanged in type III embryos. To identify alveolar type 2 epithelial (AECII) cells, known to be reduced in the Fgf10-heterozygous mutant, immunostaining using anti-surfactant protein C (SPC) antibody was performed: In the E18.5 lungs, the number of AECII was correlated to the percentage of functional Fgf10 genotypes. These data suggest the Fgf10 gene dose-related loss of the accessory lobe and decrease in the number of alveolar type 2 epithelial cells in mouse lung. Since dysfunction of AECII cells has been implicated in the pathogenesis of parenchymal lung diseases, the Fgf10-CRISPR F0 mouse would present an ideal experimental system to explore it.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33057360
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240333
pii: PONE-D-20-17163
pmc: PMC7561199
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fibroblast Growth Factor 10
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0240333Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Supported by an academic grant from Pfizer Japan, Inc. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Front Physiol. 2016 Oct 25;7:488
pubmed: 27826253
Cell. 1986 Jul 4;46(1):19-29
pubmed: 3013418
Mol Genet Genomics. 2016 Apr;291(2):513-30
pubmed: 26481646
Mol Cell Biol. 2005 Jan;25(2):671-84
pubmed: 15632068
Development. 2014 Jan;141(2):296-306
pubmed: 24353064
Dev Biol. 2004 Jan 1;265(1):61-74
pubmed: 14697353
J Pathol. 2017 Jan;241(1):91-103
pubmed: 27770432
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2007 Apr;36(4):391-7
pubmed: 17142311
Nat Med. 2017 Apr 3;23(4):415-423
pubmed: 28388605
Genes Dev. 1998 Oct 15;12(20):3156-61
pubmed: 9784490
Development. 1997 Dec;124(23):4867-78
pubmed: 9428423
Dev Biol. 2006 Nov 15;299(2):373-85
pubmed: 16956603
Development. 2018 Aug 15;145(16):
pubmed: 30111617
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 5;116(10):4362-4371
pubmed: 30782824
Front Genet. 2019 Mar 12;10:170
pubmed: 30930931
Sci Rep. 2015 Feb 10;5:8366
pubmed: 25666713
Sci Rep. 2015 Jun 11;5:11315
pubmed: 26066060
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 30;115(5):E974-E981
pubmed: 29339516
Dev Biol. 1997 Aug 15;188(2):337-48
pubmed: 9268579
Evolution. 2015 Oct;69(10):2543-55
pubmed: 26374500
Sci Rep. 2014 Jul 16;4:5705
pubmed: 25027812
Nature. 2005 Jul 21;436(7049):347-55
pubmed: 16034409
J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1974 Dec;32(3):651-60
pubmed: 4463222
Nat Rev Genet. 2013 May;14(5):307-20
pubmed: 23594909
Nat Genet. 1999 Jan;21(1):138-41
pubmed: 9916808
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jun 1;46(10):e58
pubmed: 29538768
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec;7(1):53
pubmed: 28246397
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 21;10(10):e0140279
pubmed: 26488883
J Anat. 2008 May;212(5):590-602
pubmed: 18430087
PLoS Genet. 2005 Jul;1(1):58-65
pubmed: 16103912
Genome Res. 2014 Jan;24(1):125-31
pubmed: 24253447
Dev Cell. 2018 Feb 5;44(3):297-312.e5
pubmed: 29408236
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 03;6:34524
pubmed: 27694906
Genes Cells. 2020 Jul;25(7):498-509
pubmed: 32323394
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012 May 01;4(5):
pubmed: 22550231
Dev Biol. 2007 Jul 15;307(2):237-47
pubmed: 17560563
Cell. 2013 Sep 12;154(6):1370-9
pubmed: 23992847
J Anat. 2010 Apr;216(4):482-8
pubmed: 20136669
Development. 2013 Sep;140(18):3731-42
pubmed: 23924632
Nat Genet. 2017 Mar;49(3):426-432
pubmed: 28166215
Dev Biol. 2016 Oct 1;418(1):1-9
pubmed: 27474397
Dev Biol. 2014 Sep 1;393(1):3-9
pubmed: 24984260
Cell. 2014 Jun 5;157(6):1262-1278
pubmed: 24906146
Science. 2014 Nov 28;346(6213):1258096
pubmed: 25430774
Development. 2005 May;132(9):2157-66
pubmed: 15800000