Experimental optimization of the energy for breast-CT with synchrotron radiation.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 10 2020
15 10 2020
Historique:
received:
20
04
2020
accepted:
30
09
2020
entrez:
16
10
2020
pubmed:
17
10
2020
medline:
9
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Breast Computed Tomography (bCT) is a three-dimensional imaging technique that is raising interest among radiologists as a viable alternative to mammographic planar imaging. In X-rays imaging it would be desirable to maximize the capability of discriminating different tissues, described by the Contrast to Noise Ratio (CNR), while minimizing the dose (i.e. the radiological risk). Both dose and CNR are functions of the X-ray energy. This work aims at experimentally investigating the optimal energy that, at fixed dose, maximizes the CNR between glandular and adipose tissues. Acquisitions of both tissue-equivalent phantoms and actual breast specimens have been performed with the bCT system implemented within the Syrma-3D collaboration at the Syrmep beamline of the Elettra synchrotron (Trieste). The experimental data have been also compared with analytical simulations and the results are in agreement. The CNR is maximized at energies around 26-28 keV. These results are in line with the outcomes of a previously presented simulation study which determined an optimal energy of 28 keV for a large set of breast phantoms with different diameters and glandular fractions. Finally, a study on photon starvation has been carried out to investigate how far the dose can be reduced still having suitable images for diagnostics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33060795
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74607-7
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-74607-7
pmc: PMC7567093
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17430Références
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Jan 21;61(2):569-87
pubmed: 26683710
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Mar 21;62(6):2315-2332
pubmed: 28140377
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2017 Dec 1;34(12):2251-2260
pubmed: 29240102
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2018 Jul 1;25(Pt 4):1068-1077
pubmed: 29979168
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2019 Jul;6(3):031402
pubmed: 30525064
Med Phys. 2004 Feb;31(2):226-35
pubmed: 15000608
J Microsc. 2002 Apr;206(Pt 1):33-40
pubmed: 12000561
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 11;9(1):13135
pubmed: 31511550
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Feb 21;61(4):1634-49
pubmed: 26836274
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):583-9
pubmed: 23623721
Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):165-75
pubmed: 12355001
Radiology. 1979 Feb;130(2):485-91
pubmed: 760167
Clin Radiol. 2013 May;68(5):e225-36
pubmed: 23465326
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Nov 21;58(22):7921-36
pubmed: 24165162
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Sep 7;55(17):4993-5005
pubmed: 20702925
Med Phys. 2009 Nov;36(11):5149-61
pubmed: 19994525
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Apr 3;146(7):502-10
pubmed: 17404352
Med Phys. 2005 Dec;32(12):3767-76
pubmed: 16475776
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2018 Jan;5(1):013503
pubmed: 29430473
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2018 Sep 1;25(Pt 5):1460-1466
pubmed: 30179186
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 21;7(1):15953
pubmed: 29162913
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009 Mar;135(3):339-54
pubmed: 18661152
Acad Radiol. 2020 Feb 5;:
pubmed: 32035759
Phys Med. 2016 May;32(5):681-90
pubmed: 27160829
JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1245-56
pubmed: 15755947
Med Phys. 2015 Jun;42(6):2786-804
pubmed: 26127031
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Sep;179(3):583-90
pubmed: 12185024
Med Phys. 1996 Dec;23(12):1997-2005
pubmed: 8994164
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Dec 18;63(24):24NT03
pubmed: 30524112
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Aug 21;60(16):N311-23
pubmed: 26267405
Radiology. 2001 Dec;221(3):657-67
pubmed: 11719660
Phys Med Biol. 2014 May 7;59(9):2199-217
pubmed: 24710764
JAMA. 1993 Nov 24;270(20):2444-50
pubmed: 8230621
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Aug;195(2):496-509
pubmed: 20651210
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2019 Jul 1;26(Pt 4):1343-1353
pubmed: 31274463
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Aug 07;64(15):155011
pubmed: 31234148